LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Lloyd Elliott Heads: PROBLEM??? HELP:confused:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2010, 10:47 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jwindh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 39
Lloyd Elliott Heads: PROBLEM??? HELP:confused:

Ok, I have a set of aluminum LE2 heads for my LT1. I was inspecting them before I get ready to install and noticed that the same exhaust port on each head (2 ports total) has been ported to the point that it has broken through the port wall and into the header bolt hole. I called Lloyd about this and he says that this is common when porting in order to get the numbers required and that it is not a problem. I have faith in lloyd and take his word for law as he would not have the reputation that he has if he were not open and honest. I have also read hundreds of reviews on his work and not come across the first negative comment. However, I would like to hear some reassurance to put myself at ease before I install these heads and experience driveability or durability issues.
jwindh1 is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 11:06 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
camaronutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ford City Pennsylvania
Posts: 528
what casting number is on your heads?? I have heard that the 97 with 571 casting (i think) heads have this problem because the head is thinner in this area. if he says it will be ok.. it will be ok. I dont see it causing much of a problem.
camaronutt is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 11:12 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jwindh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 39
Yes, these are the 561 casting number heads. Lloyd said the same thing about the "meat" being less.
jwindh1 is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 02:32 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
OneShoe50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 108
Use a little anti-sieze on the bolt, she'll be good to go! No coolant in that area. Another level of protection would be using a stud instead of a bolt, less chance of pulling those threads when installing or removing.
OneShoe50 is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 07:54 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jwindh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 39
So, nobody thinks that I will experience any longevity issues because of this? This is not a daily driver and is not a strip car, this is in my '71 Nova cruiser. I don't want to run into an issue where I have to yank these heads in 50K-60K miles due to this issue.
jwindh1 is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 07:58 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
tapout911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Paragould Ar
Posts: 398
I dont see that being an issue. Like the others said, just put some anti sieze and forget it.
tapout911 is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 08:09 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
MrBuick (Magnum)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Benton Harbor, MI
Posts: 22
That's quite... "Impressive". I sure would not want those heads on my car. Where else are they getting thin, and Llyod hasn't mentioned anything?

I can't say this is the first time I have heard of an issue like this with his heads.

Last edited by MrBuick (Magnum); 04-10-2010 at 08:11 PM.
MrBuick (Magnum) is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 08:43 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
arnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: smog zone adjacent to a great lake
Posts: 1,462
Originally Posted by jwindh1
However, I would like to hear some reassurance to put myself at ease before I install these heads and experience driveability or durability issues.
Have you (or anyone else in this thread) seen or heard of the rocker arm stud threaded hole being exposed in the roof of the port after porting? Is this situation much different? The rocker arm stud is just that, a stud requiring sealer. I agree with the suggestion to use a stud in (at least) that threaded hole along with a sealing compound.

I don't see it as a major issue, questioning the need to open up the port to that degree notwithstanding. I'd be more concerned with the integrity of the threaded hole as it relates to clamping ability/reliability.

Last edited by arnie; 04-10-2010 at 08:52 PM.
arnie is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 09:10 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jwindh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 39
Originally Posted by MrBuick (Magnum)
That's quite... "Impressive". I sure would not want those heads on my car. Where else are they getting thin, and Llyod hasn't mentioned anything?

I can't say this is the first time I have heard of an issue like this with his heads.
They are only "thin" in that one area of that port in each head. I spoke with Lloyd on the phone and he assured me that it is not a problem. Logically speaking, I don't see how it would be a problem, but it's just the principle of there being a hole in the exhaust port on a $1300 set of heads. If its ok, then its ok and I will run them as is.
jwindh1 is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 09:47 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
arnie, IMO the bottom of a hole being open is different from the side being thin and open.
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 04-11-2010, 02:02 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Slick-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: OKC., Oklahoma
Posts: 161
Hey man youll defineately be fine with those heads due to it being on the exhaust port side rather than the intake port side. The only thing it could do was maybe create some air turbulance and restiction which in your case you might loose a horsepower or two. Also just make sure that you use some bad *** lube none of that cheap **** it really makes a difference.
Slick-Z is offline  
Old 04-11-2010, 07:10 AM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jwindh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 39
Originally Posted by Slick-Z
Hey man youll defineately be fine with those heads due to it being on the exhaust port side rather than the intake port side. The only thing it could do was maybe create some air turbulance and restiction which in your case you might loose a horsepower or two. Also just make sure that you use some bad *** lube none of that cheap **** it really makes a difference.
When you guys say lube and never seize, I assume that "lube" is also never seize. Should I use a permatex thread sealant or a copper based high temp never seize?
jwindh1 is offline  
Old 04-11-2010, 07:53 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kantuckee Yo'
Posts: 4,405
This is the reason many folks prefer not to port 561 heads. I think you will be fine.

Last edited by wrd1972; 04-12-2010 at 07:25 AM.
wrd1972 is offline  
Old 04-11-2010, 08:11 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Kevin Blown 95 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,684
Originally Posted by jwindh1
When you guys say lube and never seize, I assume that "lube" is also never seize. Should I use a permatex thread sealant or a copper based high temp never seize?
Like the other guys suggested, try to put a stud in there, then you don't need the lube. You could locktite the stud if you wanted, as long as your headers fit over it when it's installed. If not, then skip the locktite and just turn the stud in after the header is on there. Either way, a stud is going to be better than turning a bolt in there. I suppose you could have a thread insert done on it, but then it would extend into your port a little and would have even less aluminum by the time it was installed so maybe that isn't a good option.

I'd be interested to see the matchup between your headers and that port.
Kevin Blown 95 TA is offline  
Old 04-11-2010, 08:28 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kantuckee Yo'
Posts: 4,405
Good idea. A stud.
wrd1972 is offline  


Quick Reply: Lloyd Elliott Heads: PROBLEM??? HELP:confused:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM.