2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos
View Poll Results: Is $50,000 a good VALUE if the Z28 is what we are expecting it to be?
Yes
50.00%
No
39.29%
I don't know
10.71%
Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

$50 grand* for a Camaro Z28. Is that a good VALUE**?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2010 | 09:09 AM
  #46  
JasonD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Originally Posted by 5thgen69camaro
yeah thats true. Those I think go for like 200k or something.
Ouch, not that I know of...I believe 60-80k or so...depending on what "extras" you get.
Old 10-05-2010 | 09:19 AM
  #47  
WhiteHawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 943
Originally Posted by STOCK1SC
What they mean is you have to factor in with inflation not literally the same dollar amount. $22k in 2002 is about the equivalent of $30k in 2011. Kind of like old farts bragging about back when gas was .25 a gallon but the average paycheck was $70.
But vehicle pricing was pretty stagnant through most of the 00's. It definitely wasn't 4-5% to justify the current 1SS pricing.

-Geoff
Old 10-05-2010 | 09:32 AM
  #48  
Outrun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 269
From: Camaro chick in WI
Yes!
Old 10-05-2010 | 09:56 AM
  #49  
WhiteHawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 943
Originally Posted by 2010_5thgen
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ang_specs.html according to motortrend, the 2002 ss as tested was 32k. i dont know where your getting a 2002 z28 for 22 but i had a 1999 v6 and it was 22k new. no leather, had t tops and was auto. that was about the only options.
I got pricing from MSN Auto section. The 2002 SS you are referencing that motor trend tested was like a $6,000 option where the car was sent to SLP for a hood, tires, wheels, exhaust, and a bunch more optional stuff. That was on top of the V8 pricing already. The Z28 I was referencing was the base V8 on the 4th gen, like the 1SS is on a 5th gen. Apples to Apples.

-Geoff
Old 10-05-2010 | 01:12 PM
  #50  
OutsiderIROC-Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,688
From: Middle of Kansas
Originally Posted by 2010_5thgen
however i dont think it should be called the Z28. reason being, the Z28 isnt what this car is. The Z28 should be a stripped down model, lightweight,big brakes, track car. the new "z28" isnt what it should be.
This.
Old 10-05-2010 | 01:25 PM
  #51  
OutsiderIROC-Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,688
From: Middle of Kansas
Originally Posted by 95birdible
A I am sorry but I think the General has gotten away from what was originally intended with these cars. Just my 2 cents.
I have felt this way since it started becoming clearer just what a 5th Gen Camaro was going to be...
Old 10-05-2010 | 02:37 PM
  #52  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
Originally Posted by WhiteHawk
I got pricing from MSN Auto section. The 2002 SS you are referencing that motor trend tested was like a $6,000 option where the car was sent to SLP for a hood, tires, wheels, exhaust, and a bunch more optional stuff. That was on top of the V8 pricing already. The Z28 I was referencing was the base V8 on the 4th gen, like the 1SS is on a 5th gen. Apples to Apples.

-Geoff
yeah, like i said it was an ss and it was 32k. n omatter where it was sent, they were sold as ss and 32k was the sticker on a 2002 SS. and like i said i had a 99 v6 that was 22k. so yeah lets compare apples to apples.
Old 10-05-2010 | 02:40 PM
  #53  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
the more i think about it and read about it, i really like the concept of the new Mustang BOSS 302. this...is what the Z28 should be. THIS.....is what the Z28 needs to compete against. the LSA model needs to be called something else. and the price range that the boss 302 is at(40k) is perfect for what it is. chevy needs a z28 like the boss.
Old 10-05-2010 | 04:19 PM
  #54  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Just bring out a Camaro Type-R with a slightly hotter NA motor, little more aggressive rear gears, wider front wheels, Koni shocks, and PS2s.
Old 10-05-2010 | 04:25 PM
  #55  
JasonD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Wink

Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
Just bring out a Camaro Type-R with a slightly hotter NA motor, little more aggressive rear gears, wider front wheels, Koni shocks, and PS2s.
WOW.

/thread.

Jerk.

Old 10-05-2010 | 04:50 PM
  #56  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by 2010_5thgen
the more i think about it and read about it, i really like the concept of the new Mustang BOSS 302. this...is what the Z28 should be. THIS.....is what the Z28 needs to compete against. the LSA model needs to be called something else. and the price range that the boss 302 is at(40k) is perfect for what it is. chevy needs a z28 like the boss.

I agree. I don't think we'll be getting something like that on this gen though.
Old 10-05-2010 | 05:36 PM
  #57  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by 2010_5thgen
yeah, like i said it was an ss and it was 32k. n omatter where it was sent, they were sold as ss and 32k was the sticker on a 2002 SS. and like i said i had a 99 v6 that was 22k. so yeah lets compare apples to apples.
In 2002, what is now the SS was called the Z28. That is your "apples to apples" comparison. At this point in time, there is no 5th Gen equivalent to the 2002 SS, and it doesn't really appear as if there is going to be any time soon.

If you think otherwise, then I suppose when the 2012 Z28 comes out, you'll need to compare it to the 2002 Z28.

Ya.
Old 10-05-2010 | 08:07 PM
  #58  
WhiteHawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 943
Originally Posted by 2010_5thgen
yeah, like i said it was an ss and it was 32k. n omatter where it was sent, they were sold as ss and 32k was the sticker on a 2002 SS. and like i said i had a 99 v6 that was 22k. so yeah lets compare apples to apples.
You are so far out on this one, I am not even going to touch it. Do a little research next time.

-Geoff
Old 10-06-2010 | 07:48 AM
  #59  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
what was so far off? the fact that i had a new 99 v6 that was 22k or the fact that the sticker on the SS was 32k that i almost bought? tell ya what, if i can find my window sticker from my car, ill take a picture for you, just to rub it in your face.....
Old 10-06-2010 | 08:52 AM
  #60  
STOCK1SC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,049
From: Confederate States of America
Originally Posted by WhiteHawk
But vehicle pricing was pretty stagnant through most of the 00's. It definitely wasn't 4-5% to justify the current 1SS pricing.

-Geoff
If you compare the amount of material that goes into the 5th gen compared to the 4th it is a greater value, added side airbags, standard brembos, onstar, XM, IRS, 6 speed auto, the content is way above what you were getting for your money in the 4th gen. 4th gen was basically an engine wrapped in a shell barely capable of holding up to twisting in half compared to the 5th gen. I'm no lover of the 5th gen but it is more car for the money, it just isn't a faster car than it was 10 years ago unfortunately.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 AM.