2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

2010 Camaro specs available now!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2008, 11:18 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
TCMcQueen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 61
Originally Posted by MarcR94v6
23 HWY MPG is pathetic. Is this with AFM too?
Of everything that was released today the MPG for myself was the most disappointing. My stang gets 23 on the highway (it's an auto as well), I really was hoping the camaro would be substantially better in this regard. I already consider my stang a gas *****.
TCMcQueen is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 11:25 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
graham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: northeast Miss.
Posts: 2,887
Originally Posted by TCMcQueen
Of everything that was released today the MPG for myself was the most disappointing. My stang gets 23 on the highway (it's an auto as well), I really was hoping the camaro would be substantially better in this regard. I already consider my stang a gas *****.
If epa ends up saying it'll get 23, itll get 28. lol
graham is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 11:27 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
TCMcQueen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 61
Originally Posted by graham
If epa ends up saying it'll get 23, itll get 28. lol
Really? I always get lower than what the stickers say.

Lead foot maybe?
TCMcQueen is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 11:41 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
TrickStang37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
Originally Posted by TCMcQueen
Really? I always get lower than what the stickers say.

Lead foot maybe?
the new EPA standards are supposed to be more realistic in what to expect.
TrickStang37 is offline  
Old 07-22-2008, 07:14 AM
  #50  
Registered User
 
onebadponcho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Shelton, WA
Posts: 954
Originally Posted by TCMcQueen
Really? I always get lower than what the stickers say.

Lead foot maybe?
You're in L.A., so I assume you spend a lot of your time stuck in traffic. That probably has something to do with it.
onebadponcho is offline  
Old 07-22-2008, 07:39 AM
  #51  
Registered User
 
CCz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 14
WOW, this thing is awesome. I like it a lot. We need some SS pics now.


Did I read correctly that the V6 holds 7.6 quarts of oil and the V8 is almost 9?

Mobil1 will be very happy....



Well done GM!
CCz28 is offline  
Old 07-22-2008, 07:49 AM
  #52  
Registered User
 
Z28Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 6,165
Grandma-driving my LS1 last week netted me just over 21 mpg -- city. Mileage looks to be a good bit worse, but most expect mileage to not be good when going in the dealership to check out/buy one anyway I guess....
Z28Wilson is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Collector Car
Cars For Sale
0
01-05-2015 10:58 AM
Brandon Wittmer
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
12-20-2014 09:51 PM
ModdedNerd
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
10
12-10-2014 08:42 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
12-04-2014 11:56 AM
The Seer
Classic Engine Tech
2
11-26-2014 05:55 PM



Quick Reply: 2010 Camaro specs available now!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.