2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

2010 Camaro V6 HP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2009 | 01:24 PM
  #16  
mako350Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 341
From: Roanoke,Virginia
I don't see where the guy (or girl) in the GT should be much worried about the V6 Camaro.

Sure the Camaro has 4 more hp but the mustang has 45 more ft-lbs of torque and weighs about 200-300 lbs less than the Camaro.

If the Camaro is a manual and the Mustang is an automatic then, from a roll, I could maybe see it being a close race but the Mustang will still win.
Old 01-14-2009 | 01:51 PM
  #17  
MetalDragon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 524
From: Houston Area
Originally Posted by 2010_5thgen
man this guy is in love with mustangs. your spending more time defending the mustangs than you are surprised that the camaro(v6) will take the mustang. kinda pathetic
I don't think he was defending Mustang as much as pointing out that an LS/LT Camaro will NOT outrun a GT unless you factor in something unexpected. HP isn't everything. Weight and TQ numbers should even that up and then some. Now....against an SS.....

On the other hand, while I would expect a GT to have a slight advantage, I would almost be embarrassed to have a V6 that close behind me.

*I'm not necessarily talking drag strip here - more "real world" stoplight to stoplight kind of thing*
Old 01-14-2009 | 02:26 PM
  #18  
CamaroScotty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 583
From: CEDARBURG, WI
Originally Posted by CLEAN
What's the mpg?
GM Estimated 27 MPG
Old 01-14-2009 | 02:42 PM
  #19  
boxerperson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 233
Originally Posted by mako350Z28
I don't see where the guy (or girl) in the GT should be much worried about the V6 Camaro.

Sure the Camaro has 4 more hp but the mustang has 45 more ft-lbs of torque and weighs about 200-300 lbs less than the Camaro.

If the Camaro is a manual and the Mustang is an automatic then, from a roll, I could maybe see it being a close race but the Mustang will still win.
Other way around actually. The automatic in the mustang, now that it has the same number of gears, seems to be giving the same times....and on the street it's much easier and more consistent.
Old 01-14-2009 | 04:19 PM
  #20  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
Originally Posted by MetalDragon
I don't think he was defending Mustang as much as pointing out that an LS/LT Camaro will NOT outrun a GT unless you factor in something unexpected. HP isn't everything. Weight and TQ numbers should even that up and then some. Now....against an SS.....

On the other hand, while I would expect a GT to have a slight advantage, I would almost be embarrassed to have a V6 that close behind me.

*I'm not necessarily talking drag strip here - more "real world" stoplight to stoplight kind of thing*
ill bet there will be a few v6 motors coming out a little hot. meaning there may be a few that get a couple extra ponies. ive seen it before. especially if the v6 buyer gets the exhaust and intake and (are shorty's offered on the v6) shorty's, im sure its going to be damn close.
Old 01-14-2009 | 06:21 PM
  #21  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Originally Posted by 2010_5thgen
ill bet there will be a few v6 motors coming out a little hot. meaning there may be a few that get a couple extra ponies. ive seen it before. especially if the v6 buyer gets the exhaust and intake and (are shorty's offered on the v6) shorty's, im sure its going to be damn close.
but then you're comparing modified to stock. a mustang GT will beat a V6 camaro.
Old 01-14-2009 | 06:57 PM
  #22  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Are we talking 05-09 GT's here with 300hp/320 ft.lbs. (3.31 or 3.55 cogs) or '10 GT's with 315hp/325 ft.lbs? and are you talking 3.31, 3.55, or 3.73 cogged rear ends.
Old 01-14-2009 | 06:59 PM
  #23  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Originally Posted by bossco
Are we talking 05-09 GT's here with 300hp/320 ft.lbs. (3.31 or 3.55 cogs) or '10 GT's with 315hp/325 ft.lbs? and are you talking 3.31, 3.55, or 3.73 cogged rear ends.
does it matter? they will all beat a V6 5th gen.
Old 01-14-2009 | 07:04 PM
  #24  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Awesome news, keep the info coming!
Old 01-14-2009 | 07:34 PM
  #25  
Ray86IROC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 642
From: Atlanta, Ga
I'm very interested to see the final performance numbers and hopefully a same day-same driver mag test for the V6 Camaro vs Mustang GT. I expect the GT will lay the smack down pretty heavily. I'd love to see the same test against an older LT1 Fbody too...
Old 01-14-2009 | 07:34 PM
  #26  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Originally Posted by Ray86IROC
I'm very interested to see the final performance numbers and hopefully a same day-same driver mag test for the V6 Camaro vs Mustang GT. I expect the GT will lay the smack down pretty heavily.
in a straight line only.........
Old 01-14-2009 | 08:43 PM
  #27  
Chevymuscle311's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 53
The v6 will get beat by a GT by 2-3 car lengths if both are drivin by competent drivers. Could be close or a blow out if one driver is superior to the other. I would be embarrassed if a stock v6 mustang was anywhere close to my SS.
Old 01-15-2009 | 07:16 AM
  #28  
jcamere94z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,512
From: Miami, FL, US
that's exactly my point... now we are not even talking SS vs GT... no, we are putting the v6 vs the GT. Gotta love GM.
Old 01-15-2009 | 09:07 AM
  #29  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
Originally Posted by 97z28/m6
but then you're comparing modified to stock. a mustang GT will beat a V6 camaro.
not really because all of those parts are stock components
Old 01-15-2009 | 09:10 AM
  #30  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
Originally Posted by jcamere94z28
that's exactly my point... now we are not even talking SS vs GT... no, we are putting the v6 vs the GT. Gotta love GM.
i know. its funny that were dabating how much the v6 will lose by....to the gt! not even comparing the v6 to v6. gt owners have to be pissing their pants. i bet Summits sales are going through the roof from past gt owners buying up performance parts!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 PM.