2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

2nd Drag Test, same Henessey IOM SS with a different driver

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2009 | 11:17 PM
  #1  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Post 2nd Drag Test, same Henessey IOM SS with a different driver

Seems that Nine Ball, Tony, from LS1Tech PlanetLSX.com and from Ls1.com fame for those of us who frequented those sites know drove the Henessey 2010 IOM Camaro SS at LoneStar. Same track with better results but not great.

Conditions seemed to be quite adverse for drag racing. Claimed temps of 88 degrees led to a high DA along with a headwind.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uxLlJi3tq8

He claims to have powershifted the car and that any dip in rpm heard was torque management. An immediate difference from the run that Henessey took in this car were the shifting at redline meaning no need to shift into 4th gear while in the traps.

13.51 @ 107 mph, 2.1 60ft.

Last edited by 99SilverSS; 05-05-2009 at 01:07 AM.
Old 05-05-2009 | 12:33 AM
  #2  
monstertodd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 357
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
Seems that Nine Ball, Tony, from LS1Tecch PlanetLSX.com and from Ls1.com fame for those of us who frequented those sites know drove the Henessey 2010 IOM Camaro SS at LoneStar. Same track with better results but not great.

Conditions seemed to be quite adverse for drag racing. Claimed temps of 88 degrees led to a high DA along with a headwind. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xXkm...eature=related

He claims to have powershifted the car and that any dip in rpm heard was torque management. An immediate difference from the run that Henessey took in this car were the shifting at redline meaning no need to shift into 4th gear while in the traps.

13.51 @ 107 mph, 2.1 60ft.
I got a jack in the box commercial
Old 05-05-2009 | 01:04 AM
  #3  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by monstertodd
I got a jack in the box commercial
That was what I was watching first! Don't ya just love it.

Fixed.
Old 05-05-2009 | 01:27 AM
  #4  
monstertodd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 357
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
That was what I was watching first! Don't ya just love it.

Fixed.
LOL,

Now I got it. nice find!
Old 05-05-2009 | 02:35 AM
  #5  
jmsjags's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 101
From: Richmond, VA
why is it so slow?? it should be doing high 12's
Old 05-05-2009 | 05:51 AM
  #6  
ex-SS-ve's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 80
From: Houston, Texas
i dont really see that car being pushed to its potential. just for the hell of it i took the 93z28 to that same track to race it. right now its good for mid to high 11s on motor. trying to find traction and all the car would only click off 12.990-13.86 @ 119-123 mph with a best of a 2.4-2.8 60 ft some sticky tires and a ***** to the wall pass in that new camaro should be a 12.6
Old 05-05-2009 | 07:59 AM
  #7  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
does anyone know if the traction was off and the competative mode was on?
Old 05-05-2009 | 09:43 AM
  #8  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
But according to another thread....and the numbers don't lie....it should have gone 13.0 - or just as quick as your average 2010 GT500.

I'm confused.

Now, back to reality....Tony knows what he is doing, and should be able to get a reasonably good time out of the car. If the temps were really 88F, then the air was probalby +2000 ft or so. Seems he got reasonable traction, and hit the gears pretty hard.

I can't imagine that we won't see these cars run significantly quicker.
Old 05-05-2009 | 10:24 AM
  #9  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
so everyone who drives the car is going to go 13.0?
did i say it would go just as quick as the gt500 or was i posting a thread to see peoples responce????
Old 05-05-2009 | 11:47 AM
  #10  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by 2010_5thgen
does anyone know if the traction was off and the competative mode was on?
Traction control was defiantly off. He said he tried the launch control and it was a major bog.
Old 05-05-2009 | 12:01 PM
  #11  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
I guess the weather wasn't so great. I liked the tire screach at every shift too. I guess the 60' wasn't horrible, but the weather probably did have something of an impact. I never really had as much luck at Lonestar as I did at HRP but which is a point I made in the last thread about this that nobody noticed. At any rate it would have likely gone a little faster than that in better weather.
Old 05-05-2009 | 12:12 PM
  #12  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
Now, back to reality....Tony knows what he is doing, and should be able to get a reasonably good time out of the car. If the temps were really 88F, then the air was probalby +2000 ft or so. Seems he got reasonable traction, and hit the gears pretty hard.

I can't imagine that we won't see these cars run significantly quicker.
Yea I posted this run to show what happens when a competent driver has the car. While there were many questions about how Henessey's driver made the last pass. But there was no question about Tony's launch, shifting rpm or if he kept his right foot down. Still conditions were not favorable and we get a very average ET and speed from the car.
Old 05-05-2009 | 01:34 PM
  #13  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Well, I don't think that will be a good "average ET and mph" either. The car is making plenty of power, and while it is certainly extremely porkish, there's no reason we won't see high 12s in stock form soon.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
naaz90
Site Help and Suggestions
3
07-27-2002 09:22 AM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
0
07-21-2002 05:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 AM.