2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

400-plus-hp, 6.0-liter V-8 or a 300-plus-hp,3.6-liter V-6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2008, 11:40 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
Northwest94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Mill Creek, WA
Posts: 511
Another great read regarding rated HP on GM LSX engines.

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1974770
Northwest94Z is offline  
Old 03-22-2008, 12:44 AM
  #47  
Registered User
 
notgetleft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: manassas, VA
Posts: 808
It's pretty basic physics for why hp loss will increase with power throughput. There is both a constant, linear, and even second and third order factors to consider. Speed, torque and acceleration all matter.

Proof? Are you unable to spin a transmission by hand? Do you think you can generate 13hp with your hands on a little shaft?

The 4 cylinder type examples are relevant too. Unless you think a 100hp 4 cylinder needs a minimum of 50% throttle to begine to even move a V8 drivetrain.

I think trying to figure exact engine output from 'corrected' dyno sheets is a big waste of time, especially different dynos on different days in different air with different chassis and different sensors for temp / baro / humidity
notgetleft is offline  
Old 03-22-2008, 01:51 AM
  #48  
Registered User
 
robb4964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,130
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
Nope, I don't buy the percentage either. IMHO, a typical V8 will lose ~50 HP through a street-style manual transmission drivetrain -whether it is a stock 205 HP 5.0, or a stock 400 HP LS2. Perhaps a bit more with the higher HP, and a bit less with the lower HP, but not double/half.

I agree. I have always though along these lines but did not have the support to back my theory and never felt like arguing. It only makes since. If you swap engines in a car the loss of power could be greater/less but it would depend on a few factors. What if anything changed about the drivetrain other then the engine? How much weight if any has the setup added? Other then a few things the percentage should remain close to the same as you suggest.
robb4964 is offline  
Old 03-22-2008, 01:18 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: TX Med Ctr
Posts: 4,000
That was a pretty good read on corvetteforum. I think the percentage numbers, especially 15-20% are a bit overplayed, especially on the higher horsepower modded cars. I think the bulk of the drivetrain loss comes from spinning the mass inside of it and as such unless you are accelerating it a lot faster you won't notice much power difference. So basically I don't think that when we are discussing cars with power and gearing that are within the realm of the street that these 2nd, 3rd, or 4th order terms to the drivetrain loss probably matter at all... which really means that they are likely on the order of a few horsepower and probably within the range of hte error in the dyno and a wash anyway.
HAZ-Matt is offline  
Old 03-22-2008, 09:56 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
robb4964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,130
Numbers that matter most to me are weight vs trap speeds. A good indicator of potential lies in the trap speed. Dyno's are good for getting maximum power. Nothing wrong with a nice dyno sheet to supplement arrogance but they dont mean everything.
robb4964 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rvonsternberg
Cars For Sale
2
09-14-2015 11:58 AM
CLEAN
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
84
02-19-2003 12:20 PM
Burmite
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
9
11-07-2002 01:35 AM
WERM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
30
10-14-2002 02:45 PM
z28projects4ever
V6 Tech
2
08-26-2002 12:10 AM



Quick Reply: 400-plus-hp, 6.0-liter V-8 or a 300-plus-hp,3.6-liter V-6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 AM.