5thgen z28 could beat all mustangs
#76
Re: 5thgen z28 could beat all mustangs
I could see GM putting a LS9 into the Camaro in 2010 and calling it the top Camaro or Z28 model. A LS9 with 500hp insted of the 650hp the BlueDevil will have, and the LS9=LS3 with forged internals and a supercharger, still 6.2L.
The Z28 would be the GT500 competitor.
While a Camaro SS would get the LS3, and the base Camaro would get a 3.6L DI VVT DOHC motor or a 3.9L V6.
I think now the Corvette's LS3 will be at 450hp to set it apart from the Camaro SS engine's 400hp LS3.
The Z28 would be the GT500 competitor.
While a Camaro SS would get the LS3, and the base Camaro would get a 3.6L DI VVT DOHC motor or a 3.9L V6.
I think now the Corvette's LS3 will be at 450hp to set it apart from the Camaro SS engine's 400hp LS3.
#77
Re: 5thgen z28 could beat all mustangs
Usually GM justs put a more restrictive air intake and exhaust on the Camaro to bring the power down from a Vette like they did with the 4th gen. Even though it didn't bring the power down much, the 4th gen F-Bodies were rated at 305hp for the lowest model V8 but were making closer to 340-350 at the flywheel for all the V8 models.
I expect the same thing to happen with the new Camaro.
I expect the same thing to happen with the new Camaro.
#78
Re: 5thgen z28 could beat all mustangs
http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...d.php?t=325785
Why is the evolution car running 10.40's with every single mod in the book, including lots of weight reduction...yet the said car above is only a 1/2 second slower with a fraction of work done.
The Shelby is badass, no doubt about it...but that car was not even close to stock! I really don't know where to go from here, this thread is outrageously comical.
Why is the evolution car running 10.40's with every single mod in the book, including lots of weight reduction...yet the said car above is only a 1/2 second slower with a fraction of work done.
The Shelby is badass, no doubt about it...but that car was not even close to stock! I really don't know where to go from here, this thread is outrageously comical.
Well, the car felt special for alot of reasons, and it wasn't just for it's power. I drove much more powerful cars last weekend, which barely left me with an afterthought. This car was special for the total package. The looks, the style, the feel, the aura of nastiness that an early Z/28 has.....I don't know, in the other thread I try to put my finger on it....but it's hard to quantify. Whatever that "thing" is...it had it.
Earlier that day, I drove a '69 Camaro COPO replica with a 427 and a '69 Camaro SS with a 375/396, (both with auto). Both of those cars were incredible. Both of those cars undoubtedly had more power than the Z/28. But neither of those cars made me feel the same "magic" that the Z/28 did.
Earlier that day, I drove a '69 Camaro COPO replica with a 427 and a '69 Camaro SS with a 375/396, (both with auto). Both of those cars were incredible. Both of those cars undoubtedly had more power than the Z/28. But neither of those cars made me feel the same "magic" that the Z/28 did.
Charlie, you just hit on "IT". That thing that very few people understand. That instance where everything comes together, and the result is a blast to drive.
It's refreshing to hear that here because there are far too many people on this site whose minds can't comprehend anything beyond horsepower acceleration numbers. It's almost like trying to explain Algebra to kindegardeners. My fox 5.0 Mustang today would have it's lunch handed to it by a new Impala SS. My B4C would essentially decimate my 97 Z28. Yet I'd prefer my old fox Mustang over an Impala and I'd be almost willing to do an even trade of my B4C to get my '97 back .
#79
#80
Re: 5thgen z28 could beat all mustangs
2. Good pionts, but GM has alot better records than Ford when it comes to durability and quality, at least when it comes to trucks. In the end though, stock doesnt matter much. I have seen a v6 mustang beat a dodge viper by 2 lenths, but that is cuzz the guy did the work to make it fast.
So the question isnt which one will be faster off the showroom floor, rather which one will be faster after i spend a few days down there with a wrench?
So the question isnt which one will be faster off the showroom floor, rather which one will be faster after i spend a few days down there with a wrench?
1. Quality: Today GM is doing very well with initial percieved quality and early problems, still, saying GM has better qulity than Ford is a pretty big reach:
a) Every 4th gen Camaro I've owned has fried power window motors. I have a 4 year old B4C sitting outside right now with both motors out. I have a 17 year old T-bird with original motors. Other Fords I've owned that were alot older... no PW motor issues.
b) My 97 Camaro ripped 2 stock clutches by 135K miles. Never happened in my Mustangs. Infact, my '89 SC Thunderbird had it's clutch replaced for the 1st time at 135K miles. I now have nearly 220,000 miles. Had the tranny rebulit last year, but the clutch was still good.
c) Went through 3 alternators in my '97 Camaro. 1st opne went at 50K miles. Dad had the same problem with his new Silverado. I've never replaced a Ford alternator.
d) Rear axles in Camaros are far weaker than Fords. Ford 9" rears are the favorite of drag racers. Put alot of power through a 4th gen rearend with sticky tires & then let me know what happens.
e) LT1s are famous for developing vacuum leaks at the rear of the manifold. LS1s sound like diesels till they warm up.
f) I've worn out the carpet next to the gas pedal in my 2002 Camaro. Ditto the '97. Never happened in the Mustangs or T-birds.
g) My '97 Camaro left me stranded 5 times in the 1st 4 years I owned it. My 85 Mustang I owned for 11 years left me stranded once, as did my 1st '89 T-bird I owned for 6 (both due to a electrical short), & my current '89 left me stranded onece (A/C pulley fried). To date, my B4C I've owned for a year and a half has been dependable, as has my '93 T-bird for the past 3.
Using just my Camaros as a yardstick, and going by my own personal experience, I'd say GM not Ford has quality issues.
Being that I'm a person who tends to put alot of mileage on my cars, tend to depend on my cars, and also tends to keep my cars longer than average, to me "Quality" isn't just off the showroom floor, but how the car holds up years down the road.
The "New GM" made cars that have come out the past couple of years will be well worn by the time the next Camaro comes out. I'm holding judgement till I see how these cars hold up.
#81
Re: 5thgen z28 could beat all mustangs
Charlie, you just hit on "IT". That thing that very few people understand. That instance where everything comes together, and the result is a blast to drive.
It's refreshing to hear that here because there are far too many people on this site whose minds can't comprehend anything beyond horsepower acceleration numbers. It's almost like trying to explain Algebra to kindegardeners. My fox 5.0 Mustang today would have it's lunch handed to it by a new Impala SS. My B4C would essentially decimate my 97 Z28. Yet I'd prefer my old fox Mustang over an Impala and I'd be almost willing to do an even trade of my B4C to get my '97 back .
It's refreshing to hear that here because there are far too many people on this site whose minds can't comprehend anything beyond horsepower acceleration numbers. It's almost like trying to explain Algebra to kindegardeners. My fox 5.0 Mustang today would have it's lunch handed to it by a new Impala SS. My B4C would essentially decimate my 97 Z28. Yet I'd prefer my old fox Mustang over an Impala and I'd be almost willing to do an even trade of my B4C to get my '97 back .
I'm less concerned about who's got the most power and more concerned about which car is the best drive.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 12:09 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
1
12-15-2014 04:09 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
2
12-07-2014 07:01 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
12-03-2014 01:30 PM