Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
#31
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
I agree with Recon. The poster he was referring to was blatantly reposting his same opinion of how he doesn't like it and not offering anything to the discussion other than "I like the Challenger better". While we want diverse opinions, reposting the same thing in the same thread multiple times over gets old.
#32
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
when i see the challenger two things come into my mind: 'which old tv show did they steal that from?', and 'boat'. the camaro is actually something new, and it's not unnecessarily large. that is why the camaro has a better chance of surviving and thriving, and prolly some of why the camaro is a bigger thing in the news now.
#33
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
Originally Posted by Z284ever
The Challenger was very badass. It looked MUCH more production ready than the Camaro.
But this is no ponycar. No sir. It's a fullsized coupe. But it looked awesome. It was funny, between the Camaro and Challenger....the GT500 almost looked frumpy.
But this is no ponycar. No sir. It's a fullsized coupe. But it looked awesome. It was funny, between the Camaro and Challenger....the GT500 almost looked frumpy.
I went to see the Shelby, sat in the convertible. The car has far more horses than either of the 2. Yet the Camaro & Challenger are getting all the press.
You're right, the Challenger looked production unless you got up very close and looked at the details. Camaro was metal, but it didn't take much to see it wasn't ready for prime time.
I think Challenger is pretty awesome as well.
#35
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
Originally Posted by guionM
I went to see the Shelby, sat in the convertible. The car has far more horses than either of the 2. Yet the Camaro & Challenger are getting all the press.
I should hedge my bets! Lets see? cast iron block, solid rear axle, unpainted mirrors, small displacement, heavy weight...so many weapons so little time!
however back on topic. Glad to see the 'maro was well recieved hopefully this will spur Ford on!.
#36
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
Dodge should have painted the Challenger in a Confederate flag configuration, a retro General Lee. Sure as I am breathing if it goes into production their is someone around here who has already thought of that.
Challenger looks good from the front and sides, but the rear looks just like the butt ugly Challenger from the seventies.
Like the Camaro, but hope some things are changed if it makes it into production. Minor cosmetics!
Challenger looks good from the front and sides, but the rear looks just like the butt ugly Challenger from the seventies.
Like the Camaro, but hope some things are changed if it makes it into production. Minor cosmetics!
#37
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
Originally Posted by Scotts94z28
Dodge should have painted the Challenger in a Confederate flag configuration, a retro General Lee.
#38
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
Originally Posted by bossco
They wouldn't touch that with a 10 foot pole, DCX considers the G. Lee to be offensive
They want that connection.
#39
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
I conceed, good point. If produced I wonder how long it will take before a challenger becomes the weapon of choice in Nascar (modifed in nascar competion friendly aero-blob of course) Seems like an natural progression. HEMI+NASCAR+Challenger= lots of drooling among those bearing a pasty white chest and well tanned arms/necks.
#40
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
You know what, bad part on dodge. They f'd everyone on that piece of crap they now call a charger, and they were almost succesful on the launch of another Iconic car. They don't understand the power of the Camaro addicts, we havent seen the challenger in decades, but it wasnt to long ago our babies were rollin off the line. Good try by dodge, but come back next year.
#41
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
Originally Posted by bossco
I conceed, good point. If produced I wonder how long it will take before a challenger becomes the weapon of choice in Nascar (modifed in nascar competion friendly aero-blob of course) Seems like an natural progression. HEMI+NASCAR+Challenger= lots of drooling among those bearing a pasty white chest and well tanned arms/necks.
#42
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
Originally Posted by SNEAKY NEIL
Are you kidding? I have an idea, lets get rid of everyone who isn't totally in love with the concept. Guess what, I don't really like it either and I have been here much longer than you an I bet that I am a bigger Camaro fan than you(if you want to go that route) and if I want to express my dissapointment about the concept, I will. Don't be pissed at others because they don't fall in line with how you are thinking.
#44
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
Originally Posted by kefkafloyd
But they painted it in the same orange as the General.
They want that connection.
They want that connection.
Its the first thing I thought of looking at that big orange box.
#45
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
Originally Posted by AnthonyHSV
Its the first thing I thought of looking at that big orange box.