Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
01-12-2006 | 12:19 AM
#46
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 848
From: Melb, Aust
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
Originally Posted by prohunter4
That's a good thing 'cause the General Lee was a bad a$$ car also.
Yeah it was good for its time..but as alot of ppl have said the new Challenger is nothing more than a photocopy.
01-12-2006 | 12:26 AM
#47
Banned
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 105
From: Moody AFB,Valdosta,Ga.
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
What's so new about the Camaro.It looks awfully retro to me, so what's the difference.There isn't. Some people would have liked it if it was made to look like a dog turd.Sometimes loyalty can be a bad thing,it can blind you to bad stuff.GM is way behind on the take a chance curve.Look how long it took them with the SSR.They need to take more chances and they will get back to selling more cars instead of worrying about where they will be in 2 years.Just one mans opinion.
01-12-2006 | 12:35 AM
#48
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 486
From: Far, far away
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
Originally Posted by prohunter4
What's so new about the Camaro.It looks awfully retro to me, so what's the difference.There isn't. Some people would have liked it if it was made to look like a dog turd.Sometimes loyalty can be a bad thing,it can blind you to bad stuff.GM is way behind on the take a chance curve.Look how long it took them with the SSR.They need to take more chances and they will get back to selling more cars instead of worrying about where they will be in 2 years.Just one mans opinion.
If you can't see the difference between a straight up lift of two earlier designs, the challenger, and a retro ish car, the camaro, you might need to have the doc cut back on some of the pain pills.
not.
01-12-2006 | 01:14 AM
#50
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 162
From: Mountain Home AFB, ID
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
Originally Posted by prohunter4
What's so new about the Camaro.It looks awfully retro to me, so what's the difference.There isn't. Some people would have liked it if it was made to look like a dog turd.Sometimes loyalty can be a bad thing,it can blind you to bad stuff.GM is way behind on the take a chance curve.Look how long it took them with the SSR.They need to take more chances and they will get back to selling more cars instead of worrying about where they will be in 2 years.Just one mans opinion.
And how could you NOT see what's new with this Camaro? Funny how you say that about the Camaro despite your preference for an almost-complete design carryover on the Challenger.
01-12-2006 | 05:21 AM
#53
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,473
From: South Bend, Indiana
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
Originally Posted by SNEAKY NEIL
Are you kidding? I have an idea, lets get rid of everyone who isn't totally in love with the concept. Guess what, I don't really like it either and I have been here much longer than you an I bet that I am a bigger Camaro fan than you(if you want to go that route) and if I want to express my dissapointment about the concept, I will. Don't be pissed at others because they don't fall in line with how you are thinking.
01-12-2006 | 01:12 PM
#57
Registered User
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,547
From: Panhandle of West Virginia
Re: Camaro puts Challenger in the dark; Challenger gets NO mention whatsoever...
Originally Posted by guionM
You know, that's 100% true! 
I went to see the Shelby, sat in the convertible. The car has far more horses than either of the 2. Yet the Camaro & Challenger are getting all the press.
You're right, the Challenger looked production unless you got up very close and looked at the details. Camaro was metal, but it didn't take much to see it wasn't ready for prime time.
I think Challenger is pretty awesome as well.
I went to see the Shelby, sat in the convertible. The car has far more horses than either of the 2. Yet the Camaro & Challenger are getting all the press.
You're right, the Challenger looked production unless you got up very close and looked at the details. Camaro was metal, but it didn't take much to see it wasn't ready for prime time.
I think Challenger is pretty awesome as well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
1
12-15-2014 04:09 PM