Do we really need the Z28?
#76
If you go by sales numbers, and decide what a Z28 is or should be by what kind of Z28s people have bought the most of, then a 1LE lightweight special is not in fact what a Z28 is.
For brief periods of time, in limited numbers, Z28s have been light weight road race and autocross specials. The 1st gen Z28, the 3rd gen 1LE cars, and the 4th gen 1LE cars.
However, the vast majority of Z28s have been top of the line or near top of the line Camaros with the biggest/most powerful engines available at the time. This holds true for 2nd gen cars, especially late 2nd gen cars. 3rd gen cars (I'm including IROC-Zs in this number). It more or less holds true for 4th gens as well - while the SS was the "top of the line" the Z28 was more similar to the SS than it was different, and the 4th gen Z28 wasn't a lightweight 1LE track special.
I think a 1LE car is very neat, and if it can be offered, they should go for it. But give us a full boat loaded out big motor Z28 too!
For brief periods of time, in limited numbers, Z28s have been light weight road race and autocross specials. The 1st gen Z28, the 3rd gen 1LE cars, and the 4th gen 1LE cars.
However, the vast majority of Z28s have been top of the line or near top of the line Camaros with the biggest/most powerful engines available at the time. This holds true for 2nd gen cars, especially late 2nd gen cars. 3rd gen cars (I'm including IROC-Zs in this number). It more or less holds true for 4th gens as well - while the SS was the "top of the line" the Z28 was more similar to the SS than it was different, and the 4th gen Z28 wasn't a lightweight 1LE track special.
I think a 1LE car is very neat, and if it can be offered, they should go for it. But give us a full boat loaded out big motor Z28 too!
#77
Every business case is dependant on the amount of confidence that there's a solid profit, without regard to units sold as much as money spent to money made.
Specifications meeting expectations. It's a key, however, inspiring the check to be stroked or the note be signed... only then you walk in financial reality. It isn't simple, but it is elemental.
If there is a solid business case, there is a solid chance it will be pursued. Of course, you should shoot for the max sales but, not one unit over the max beneficial build.
Large numbers of units sold can suggest that there is benefit from the economies of scale. Still, ROI is the name of the game. Building exactly to the market is the perfect scenario. Building one less than the demand is even better for the seller and the buyer; mostly because the buyer benefits from not only residual value but some degree of exclusivity can also benefit the seller and customer. No sin can be called when the customer is reassured he/she made a wise and timely buy.
Making money depends more on how a company reviews the profit potential in dollars and customer satisfaction rather than buy into a project miscalculated into an unrealistic scenario. Miss the first side of the ROI equation? You will rue the day.
Specifications meeting expectations. It's a key, however, inspiring the check to be stroked or the note be signed... only then you walk in financial reality. It isn't simple, but it is elemental.
If there is a solid business case, there is a solid chance it will be pursued. Of course, you should shoot for the max sales but, not one unit over the max beneficial build.
Large numbers of units sold can suggest that there is benefit from the economies of scale. Still, ROI is the name of the game. Building exactly to the market is the perfect scenario. Building one less than the demand is even better for the seller and the buyer; mostly because the buyer benefits from not only residual value but some degree of exclusivity can also benefit the seller and customer. No sin can be called when the customer is reassured he/she made a wise and timely buy.
Making money depends more on how a company reviews the profit potential in dollars and customer satisfaction rather than buy into a project miscalculated into an unrealistic scenario. Miss the first side of the ROI equation? You will rue the day.
As an MBA I am very familiar with the formula for ROI. My point simply was that GM would not set an artificial production limit on a car that has yet to reach a point in development that a reasonable cost basis can be developed. At least that is what I believe. However should they decide to produce the Z28 I am sure we will not be a limited edition car as the OP suggested. As an example GM has a production target of roughly 2200 ZR1's for the first year but it seems clear that they will build every car they can sell.
#78
On the subject of weight we all need to realize there is not going to be a lighter version of the Camaro. It is about as light as it can be under the cost structure and engineering limits. One thing that definitely will not happen is a stripped down version to save weight. Look at the ZR1 as an example it weight more than the Z06. Take a look at any car in the class and size of the Camaro and they are all about the same weight or more. This is a byproduct of all of the toys and safety requirements that we demand these days. Want a light car? Go to India, but it ain't gonna happen outside of the third world.
#79
Well, just imagine a Z28 with a 1LE package...
Z28 could be what we are describing here, a lighter weight, tuned up version of the SS, while the 1LE removes more weight, lighter wheels, better brakes, perhaps Magnaride II shocks, and perhaps some carbon fiber pieces?
Id also like to see Z28 to not get teh mail slot, but get rear brake vents.
Z28 could be what we are describing here, a lighter weight, tuned up version of the SS, while the 1LE removes more weight, lighter wheels, better brakes, perhaps Magnaride II shocks, and perhaps some carbon fiber pieces?
Id also like to see Z28 to not get teh mail slot, but get rear brake vents.
#80
Someone a few pages back proposed a 400 horsepower turbo 6 for the Z28. That gives us 2 400 horsepower engines, since we've already got the L99. Except one has the expense and weight of DOHC and a turbo. Why spend the extra $ to do this when the end result will essentially duplicate the L99? It will create confusion in the showroom and be a waste of $. See the Mustang SVO for an example.
And the falcon is built on the direct competition for the platform that the Camaro was built on.
#81
Well, just imagine a Z28 with a 1LE package...
Z28 could be what we are describing here, a lighter weight, tuned up version of the SS, while the 1LE removes more weight, lighter wheels, better brakes, perhaps Magnaride II shocks, and perhaps some carbon fiber pieces?
Id also like to see Z28 to not get teh mail slot, but get rear brake vents.
Z28 could be what we are describing here, a lighter weight, tuned up version of the SS, while the 1LE removes more weight, lighter wheels, better brakes, perhaps Magnaride II shocks, and perhaps some carbon fiber pieces?
Id also like to see Z28 to not get teh mail slot, but get rear brake vents.
On the subject of weight we all need to realize there is not going to be a lighter version of the Camaro. It is about as light as it can be under the cost structure and engineering limits. One thing that definitely will not happen is a stripped down version to save weight. Look at the ZR1 as an example it weight more than the Z06. Take a look at any car in the class and size of the Camaro and they are all about the same weight or more. This is a byproduct of all of the toys and safety requirements that we demand these days. Want a light car? Go to India, but it ain't gonna happen outside of the third world.
I could be wrong but doesnt that open opertunity for an SS 1LE some suspension parts of maybe a Z28 with the engine of an SS making an SS 1LE a car between the two? SS is what Im after if I can swing it. If a 1LE package on the SS car isnt too much thats what I would like. If I wait 1 year for a used after the mark ups that may be my plan...
The middle car that links the 2 is the RS.
Charlie,
Agreed 100%! I have been proposing a lighterweight, smaller engined Camaro (I thought a very high revving(7.5K+) 5.3 was the sweet spot)designed to be a corner carver extrordanaire since this debate started.Given that the cost of developing a new 5.3 is most likely prohibitive, I would prefer they take the LS3, tune it to ~450 ish hp and use as much aluminum and lightweight body panels as possible to get the weight down. Save the LSA for an upgraded SS, Z28's heritage is in Trans Am (road course) racing, SS's is the 1320.
Agreed 100%! I have been proposing a lighterweight, smaller engined Camaro (I thought a very high revving(7.5K+) 5.3 was the sweet spot)designed to be a corner carver extrordanaire since this debate started.Given that the cost of developing a new 5.3 is most likely prohibitive, I would prefer they take the LS3, tune it to ~450 ish hp and use as much aluminum and lightweight body panels as possible to get the weight down. Save the LSA for an upgraded SS, Z28's heritage is in Trans Am (road course) racing, SS's is the 1320.
This idea takes a not-so-great situation and turns it catostrophic.
Let's get to reality here. The Camaro as it is what you're going to be dealing with. Top Camaros are loaded with features as standard equptment and loaded with options. That's not GM's doing, that's OUR doing. So any idea of dropping content is a non-starter since the actual data says performance car buyers...especially, Camaro performance buyers... don't buy their cars that way. You have a better chance of selling Plague-in-a-can than you would selling a stripped top dog Camaro idea to GM.
Any Z28 proposal is going to involve parts that are either off the shelf or will be used on other cars.
Call it COPO, call it ZL1 but give the damned thing a name it was denied in the first place. It was not an SS it was not a base car. It wasnt really a Z/28though that was the closed to it. It wasnt a Yenko which btw was not a model either. Nor did have the badge of a Z/28, Yenko sYc, SS. The car had the coolest badge to my eye. The blue chevy bowtie.
If you go by sales numbers, and decide what a Z28 is or should be by what kind of Z28s people have bought the most of, then a 1LE lightweight special is not in fact what a Z28 is.
For brief periods of time, in limited numbers, Z28s have been light weight road race and autocross specials. The 1st gen Z28, the 3rd gen 1LE cars, and the 4th gen 1LE cars.
However, the vast majority of Z28s have been top of the line or near top of the line Camaros with the biggest/most powerful engines available at the time. This holds true for 2nd gen cars, especially late 2nd gen cars. 3rd gen cars (I'm including IROC-Zs in this number). It more or less holds true for 4th gens as well - while the SS was the "top of the line" the Z28 was more similar to the SS than it was different, and the 4th gen Z28 wasn't a lightweight 1LE track special.
For brief periods of time, in limited numbers, Z28s have been light weight road race and autocross specials. The 1st gen Z28, the 3rd gen 1LE cars, and the 4th gen 1LE cars.
However, the vast majority of Z28s have been top of the line or near top of the line Camaros with the biggest/most powerful engines available at the time. This holds true for 2nd gen cars, especially late 2nd gen cars. 3rd gen cars (I'm including IROC-Zs in this number). It more or less holds true for 4th gens as well - while the SS was the "top of the line" the Z28 was more similar to the SS than it was different, and the 4th gen Z28 wasn't a lightweight 1LE track special.
But you are 100% correct about how most performance Camaros roll off the showrooms. They tend to be loaded. People who buy Z28s tend to want to get the most loaded Camaro they can afford. $th gen Camaros had a stripper version called the Z28. It went for a starting price of about $22,000. GM had incentives in 2002 that amounted up to over $2500 if you include the discount by financing through GMAC. One could end up with a entry level, lightest weight Z28 for under 20K.
They gathered dust on lots.
Loaded to the teeth Camaro SSs sold almost as soon as they hit the showrooms, though.
#82
Good post, but I don't even consider the '69 ZL1 a real car. Only 69 were made. There were 200 Chrysler turbine cars made that were distributed to real families. There were more Tuckers sold. You aren't going to fine a REAL ZL1 Camaro on E-bay, you'll find it at Barrett-Jackson or some other big name auctions. Last one I saw went for just under half million dollars, in case you're in the market.
#85
what road races do you want the Z28 to race in? they should build it to the spec that it's intended for then.
#86
id be happy with a ls9 in basic black with dog dish hubcap and some raised white letter tires.....if not just give me a hugger orange with white stripes/gut SS convertible...we havent owned a chevy new since 1971 (C10) and i would have to seriously consider either car over a new honda accord
#87
It’s a lot of hopes and dreams going on in this thread. Do we need a Z/28? Not right now, I think GM feels the same way. Why would they need to build a Z/28? They already got 300hp from the V6 and ~400 for the V8. That is enough to compete with the Challenger.
GM already said the Mustang is old news it’s all about the Challenger and the Nissan 350Z. OK Ford came out with a Mustang that has + 500hp Mustang so what!!! If GM does everything that ford does with wouldn't be a GM. If you want to buy a +500hp car from GM then buy a Vette, or a V series Cadillac. If they do come out with a Z/28 the 6th gen with be right around the corner.
GM already said the Mustang is old news it’s all about the Challenger and the Nissan 350Z. OK Ford came out with a Mustang that has + 500hp Mustang so what!!! If GM does everything that ford does with wouldn't be a GM. If you want to buy a +500hp car from GM then buy a Vette, or a V series Cadillac. If they do come out with a Z/28 the 6th gen with be right around the corner.
#88
It’s a lot of hopes and dreams going on in this thread. Do we need a Z/28? Not right now, I think GM feels the same way. Why would they need to build a Z/28? They already got 300hp from the V6 and ~400 for the V8. That is enough to compete with the Challenger.
GM already said the Mustang is old news it’s all about the Challenger and the Nissan 350Z. OK Ford came out with a Mustang that has + 500hp Mustang so what!!! If GM does everything that ford does with wouldn't be a GM. If you want to buy a +500hp car from GM then buy a Vette, or a V series Cadillac. If they do come out with a Z/28 the 6th gen with be right around the corner.
GM already said the Mustang is old news it’s all about the Challenger and the Nissan 350Z. OK Ford came out with a Mustang that has + 500hp Mustang so what!!! If GM does everything that ford does with wouldn't be a GM. If you want to buy a +500hp car from GM then buy a Vette, or a V series Cadillac. If they do come out with a Z/28 the 6th gen with be right around the corner.
#89
But once again, you're making a Z28 that's going to be priced even more into the stratosphere than the one that's being proposed. That means not only more cost, but also less sales and more exclusiveness. In other words, it's NOT a Z28. It's a car with alot of customized extremely lo production pieces.
This idea takes a not-so-great situation and turns it catostrophic.
Let's get to reality here. The Camaro as it is what you're going to be dealing with. Top Camaros are loaded with features as standard equptment and loaded with options. That's not GM's doing, that's OUR doing. So any idea of dropping content is a non-starter since the actual data says performance car buyers...especially, Camaro performance buyers... don't buy their cars that way. You have a better chance of selling Plague-in-a-can than you would selling a stripped top dog Camaro idea to GM.
This idea takes a not-so-great situation and turns it catostrophic.
Let's get to reality here. The Camaro as it is what you're going to be dealing with. Top Camaros are loaded with features as standard equptment and loaded with options. That's not GM's doing, that's OUR doing. So any idea of dropping content is a non-starter since the actual data says performance car buyers...especially, Camaro performance buyers... don't buy their cars that way. You have a better chance of selling Plague-in-a-can than you would selling a stripped top dog Camaro idea to GM.
Good post, but I don't even consider the '69 ZL1 a real car. Only 69 were made. There were 200 Chrysler turbine cars made that were distributed to real families. There were more Tuckers sold. You aren't going to fine a REAL ZL1 Camaro on E-bay, you'll find it at Barrett-Jackson or some other big name auctions. Last one I saw went for just under half million dollars, in case you're in the market.
The 1LE was not a "lightweight special". It was a package that included a host of handling enhancing parts geared for the racetrack. A short list included adjustable shocks, harder suspension bushings, different sway bars, different rear control bars (also used on B4C Camaros), & stiffer springs. Unlile the 4th gen, the 3rd gen versions had alumunum driveshafts and bigger brakes. The '93s were sold without A/C, T-tops, or power windows or seats.
But you are 100% correct about how most performance Camaros roll off the showrooms. They tend to be loaded. People who buy Z28s tend to want to get the most loaded Camaro they can afford. $th gen Camaros had a stripper version called the Z28. It went for a starting price of about $22,000. GM had incentives in 2002 that amounted up to over $2500 if you include the discount by financing through GMAC. One could end up with a entry level, lightest weight Z28 for under 20K.
They gathered dust on lots.
Loaded to the teeth Camaro SSs sold almost as soon as they hit the showrooms, though.
They gathered dust on lots.
Loaded to the teeth Camaro SSs sold almost as soon as they hit the showrooms, though.
Last edited by IZ28; 08-04-2008 at 01:32 AM.
#90
It’s a lot of hopes and dreams going on in this thread. Do we need a Z/28? Not right now, I think GM feels the same way. Why would they need to build a Z/28? They already got 300hp from the V6 and ~400 for the V8. That is enough to compete with the Challenger.
GM already said the Mustang is old news it’s all about the Challenger and the Nissan 350Z. OK Ford came out with a Mustang that has + 500hp Mustang so what!!! If GM does everything that ford does with wouldn't be a GM. If you want to buy a +500hp car from GM then buy a Vette, or a V series Cadillac. If they do come out with a Z/28 the 6th gen with be right around the corner.
GM already said the Mustang is old news it’s all about the Challenger and the Nissan 350Z. OK Ford came out with a Mustang that has + 500hp Mustang so what!!! If GM does everything that ford does with wouldn't be a GM. If you want to buy a +500hp car from GM then buy a Vette, or a V series Cadillac. If they do come out with a Z/28 the 6th gen with be right around the corner.
Last edited by IZ28; 08-03-2008 at 11:37 PM.