Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
#76
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
Originally Posted by 0toinsanein5.4sec
Good to know its wrong. Thanks Scott. you da man!
Scott-if you ever need evidence as to how modern it is use the images with the 69 ZL1 right next to the silver one. Lightyears a head in design. (I too used to think it was retro but that definately changed)
btw this pic is friggin awesome:
Scott-if you ever need evidence as to how modern it is use the images with the 69 ZL1 right next to the silver one. Lightyears a head in design. (I too used to think it was retro but that definately changed)
btw this pic is friggin awesome:
#77
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Different topic, but doesn't Flowmaster make a muffler for the 4th gen V6 Camaro that's supposed to make it sound like a big block V8?
Makes them loud.
But sound like a V8?
#78
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
So who are we supposed to believe? Which member of the winkie club is more correct? They can't seem to agree either. You aren't going to spill any beans (understandbly), other than to say "don't believe the media. With respects, I'm not prepared to blindly hang on your every post like some here.
We can't believe the media and we can't decide which "insider" here has the real scoop, so should we just "keep the faith" and it will happen when it happens?
Looks like its curtain number 3 again, Monty.
Bob
We can't believe the media and we can't decide which "insider" here has the real scoop, so should we just "keep the faith" and it will happen when it happens?
Looks like its curtain number 3 again, Monty.
Bob
The media (me included) have traditionally went to OEM manufacturers, people who are aware of how long it takes to get through stages inside the company (since those in the know usually don't talk). The weird thing this time around is that alot of the people directly involved are talking or doing things pretty openly.
Under normal ops, the Camaro would be at least 3 years from production, and that's what alot of people are going by. But consider these things:
1. Camaro isn't being engineered in Detroit or even the USA. It was done in Australia... away from people who would normally have an idea how far along things might be. You'll find people inside GM this very second saying with all their heart that Camaro won't happen in less than 3 years because GM historically doesn't, and simply can't move that fast, and NOT because they have accurate up to date information. Game's different this time.
2. There's alot of steps that's not going to be done with Camaro that traditionally has been done in the development process. The car isn't going to any clinics. It's not going to be sent back to have it's styling redone (which would even still require yet another clinic afterwards). A huge time saver. The car's suspension parts have already been tested. It was done on the VE Commodore mules. More chunks of time saved. The body structure testing is being done all in virturally reality (pioneered partially the Solstice), not on a series of mules, alphas, betas, etc. Again, this is taking a massive amount out of development time.
3. Finally, things aren't exactly standing still at Wilmington.
I'll simply say check up on these things, follow what's being said by the guys involved, and then come to your own conclusion.
Last edited by guionM; 02-16-2006 at 07:26 PM.
#79
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
Originally Posted by 95birdible
Just a thought on the V6 & V8 matter. I have a 95 Firebird Convertible
with a 3.4 V6 in it. My wife just bought a 2006 Dodge Caravan with a 3.3 V6.
Her mini van has more horses than my bird. While I can take her on a road course straight out she would win. That is how much technology has changed in the last ten years. Yes my car is a great cruiser but personally I would rather have a base V8 with 325 HP so I do not have to worry about some young punk thinking he is cool when he races ahead of me on a green light in his Dodge Neon or whatever. Chevy has to make the Base V6 or V8 hold it's own on the street. Make the base V6 standard and for say $200 you can upgrade 40 or 50 HP to a V8. I personally am going to buy a new Camaro Convertible with a base V8 and do not want to pay more than $28K for it. It should be priced inline with the Gt Vert Mustang and have slightly more HP.
My 2 cents!
with a 3.4 V6 in it. My wife just bought a 2006 Dodge Caravan with a 3.3 V6.
Her mini van has more horses than my bird. While I can take her on a road course straight out she would win. That is how much technology has changed in the last ten years. Yes my car is a great cruiser but personally I would rather have a base V8 with 325 HP so I do not have to worry about some young punk thinking he is cool when he races ahead of me on a green light in his Dodge Neon or whatever. Chevy has to make the Base V6 or V8 hold it's own on the street. Make the base V6 standard and for say $200 you can upgrade 40 or 50 HP to a V8. I personally am going to buy a new Camaro Convertible with a base V8 and do not want to pay more than $28K for it. It should be priced inline with the Gt Vert Mustang and have slightly more HP.
My 2 cents!
#80
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
I actually had a 2006 priced out for me at North Country Ford here in the Twin Cities and in came in at $27.750. Looks to me that is under $28K.
I didn't have the premium stereo and pretty much didn't load it up with options. I only need a V8, power top, and an auto for the wife.
I just went on Ford's site and pulled a Gt Vert for $28.5K
Just pulled up Kelly Blue Book and they are saying the invoice is $28,189
It can be done. With incentives and financing it will be even lower.
Do your reasearch before you slam me.
I didn't have the premium stereo and pretty much didn't load it up with options. I only need a V8, power top, and an auto for the wife.
I just went on Ford's site and pulled a Gt Vert for $28.5K
Just pulled up Kelly Blue Book and they are saying the invoice is $28,189
It can be done. With incentives and financing it will be even lower.
Do your reasearch before you slam me.
Last edited by 95birdible; 02-16-2006 at 08:22 PM.
#81
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
So who are we supposed to believe? Which member of the winkie club is more correct?
The Camaro will be powered by a twin-nacelle, chain pulsed warp core with dilithium control crystals and a positron flywheel.
Faster-than-light cruising speeds will obviate the usage of radar and laser detectors, but there will be significant advantages in that you will actually be able to travel back in time to your highschool years and bang old Mary Jane Rottencrotch in a Camaro... and THAT TIME she'll still have most of her teeth, so it's win/win/win.
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
The resonator-pretending-to-be-a-muffler catbacks all sound like biplanes to me.
Nieuport was the Ford of the French warplane industry in WW1, btw.
Slow and prone to spontaneous self-disassembly.
SPAD's had V8's anyway... so it's gotta be the Nieuport.
Last edited by PacerX; 02-16-2006 at 10:59 PM.
#82
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
Originally Posted by jg95z28
I'm serious. I read about it in either Hot Rod or Car Craft a while back. I'm not sure if it was referring to the 80 Series catback for the 3.8L V6, or a specific special muffler.
Sorry back to topic.
#83
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
Originally Posted by guionM
The whole proposal (including powertrains) is complete. There are some fine tuning of figures going on, but powertrain isn't one of them.
Changes have occured, and will occur again.
#84
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
Originally Posted by eagleknight97
Im still confused as to why there cant be a 250-275hp V6, a 325-350hp V8, a 400-425hp V8, and a 475-525hp V8? I realize that would be 4 engine choices, and thats assuming that we will get the super super Camaro, but my main point is with the V6 and the base V8? Im not seeing how that difference isnt enough? There is at least a 50hp difference, maybe more, not to mention a large difference in perception, sound, and torque curve.
Or would it make more sense to go to the next level up V8?
Last edited by Z284ever; 02-16-2006 at 11:54 PM.
#85
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
So who are we supposed to believe? Which member of the winkie club is more correct? They can't seem to agree either. You aren't going to spill any beans (understandbly), other than to say "don't believe the media. With respects, I'm not prepared to blindly hang on your every post like some here.
We can't believe the media and we can't decide which "insider" here has the real scoop, so should we just "keep the faith" and it will happen when it happens?
Looks like its curtain number 3 again, Monty.
Bob
We can't believe the media and we can't decide which "insider" here has the real scoop, so should we just "keep the faith" and it will happen when it happens?
Looks like its curtain number 3 again, Monty.
Bob
according to what he says expect it in showrooms in 07... thats all he mentioned, and this was to the entire sales staff... perhaps thats what he was instructed to tell us per GM...
#86
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
Originally Posted by PacerX
Nieuport or SPAD?
Nieuport was the Ford of the French warplane industry in WW1, btw.
Slow and prone to spontaneous self-disassembly.
SPAD's had V8's anyway... so it's gotta be the Nieuport.
Nieuport was the Ford of the French warplane industry in WW1, btw.
Slow and prone to spontaneous self-disassembly.
SPAD's had V8's anyway... so it's gotta be the Nieuport.
If I don't say that sometimes it is the Red Baron's Fokker, but the famous one was a DR1 and that wasn't a biplane...
Last edited by HAZ-Matt; 02-17-2006 at 01:44 AM.
#87
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
Originally Posted by Z284ever
That's one scenario. But in another, imagine if there were a 0-10 hp difference between the "entry" V8 and the V6. What do you do? Sure, you could say V8 torque and V8 burble. But can you really justify the money for both of these engines in such a scenario?
Or would it make more sense to go to the next level up V8?
Or would it make more sense to go to the next level up V8?
#88
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
Originally Posted by eagleknight97
Why try to wring all this hp out of a V6 when they already have it, proven and reliable, sittin in a V8, that gets just as good fuel economy as that high strung V6 will.
Or not......
#89
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Here's the part where I think we need to agree to disagree.
Changes have occured, and will occur again.
Changes have occured, and will occur again.
But I guess where I'm going down a different road is that the top power has already been picked.
I'm sure in typical GM fashion and foresight, the chassis has been engineered to accept an OHV V6 as well as the wider & taller OHC version, so there might be flexibility on which V6 is going to be used based on production issues. However, I'll defer to someone else who may want to interject here.
On the other hand, a 5.3 V8 being offered is a forgone conclusion.
#90
Re: Edmunds says no Camaro until 2010MY, according to suppliers
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
That is funny. What I typically say is "It will sound like Eddie Rickenbacker's Nieuport" so you got it
If I don't say that sometimes it is the Red Baron's Fokker, but the famous one was a DR1 and that wasn't a biplane...
If I don't say that sometimes it is the Red Baron's Fokker, but the famous one was a DR1 and that wasn't a biplane...
A very interesting plane, and very deadly in the hands of the right pilot.
I subscribe to the "gimme the thing with the best dive acceleration/speed" school of thought.
While the Fokker would run rings around the SPAD in a turning contest, the SPAD pilot could choose to enter the fight on his terms due to his speed advantage, or dive away at will if the fight went badly.
The ability to dive out is the fighter pilot's ace in the hole.
Hmmmm... another WW1 air combat fan on the board, very nice.