2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2006 | 09:51 AM
  #1  
CLEAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,576
From: Arlington, Texas
An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" question

Sure it was a long time ago, but it HAS happened on numerous occasions.
These are all for Trans Ams vs. Corvettes, but Trans Ams count as Fbodies last time I checked


Year Trans Am top engine Corvette top engine
1972 455 HO (300hp) LS5 (270hp)
1973 SD-455 (290hp) LS4 (275hp)
1974 SD-455 (290hp) LS4 (270hp)
1978 T/A6.6 (220hp) tie L82 (220hp)
1981 4.9Turbo(200hp) L81 (190hp)

You MAY count the TTA from '89, but the Corvette had RPOB2K that year, the twin turbo (380hp I believe). It wasn't built by GM per se, but it did have an RPO, so I'd need a ruling on whether that would count. Same w/ the '87 GNX.

Edit, and from 1967 to 1981, the Fbody ALWAYS had an optional engine that was more powerful than the Base Corvette engine. -cough cough...LS7 Camaro...cough cough-

Last edited by CLEAN; 01-17-2006 at 04:27 PM.
Old 01-17-2006 | 10:01 AM
  #2  
Fenster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 260
From: Nashville, TN
Re: An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" question

Good info CLEAN. Its always been kinda dumb to me to say that the top f-car cannot have more hp b/c it will hurt Corvette sales, when most people that buy Corvettes are goin to buy them whether the Vette has more power or not. It's a Corvette. It doesn't matter whether the top "all out" car from the Camaro has more than the base Vette. The Vette is more about standing and status than hp to those guys.
Old 01-17-2006 | 10:07 AM
  #3  
CLEAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,576
From: Arlington, Texas
Re: An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" question

I'd even go so far as to say that the vette has always been the top PERFORMER, regardless of whether it had the most hp or not, just due to it's other inherent qualities.
Old 01-17-2006 | 10:14 AM
  #4  
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,801
From: Nashville, TN
Re: An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" questio

Good info there, but since we are talking about Camaro VS. Vette, i.e. two Chevy products, I think Chevrolet marketing and branding folks will have much more consternation about HP overlap between their two performance cars.

It was different 40 years ago when the divisions were much more independent and had their own powerplants, etc.
Old 01-17-2006 | 10:50 AM
  #5  
dream '94 Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,646
From: Portland, OR
Re: An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" question

More recently, IIRC, didn't the '96 Camaro SS outpower the 'Vette by 5 hp?

SS at 305, 'Vette at 300 (not counting the Gran Sport)
Old 01-17-2006 | 10:56 AM
  #6  
CLEAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,576
From: Arlington, Texas
Re: An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" questio

Originally Posted by Chris 96 WS6
Good info there, but since we are talking about Camaro VS. Vette, i.e. two Chevy products, I think Chevrolet marketing and branding folks will have much more consternation about HP overlap between their two performance cars.

It was different 40 years ago when the divisions were much more independent and had their own powerplants, etc.
Tis true, but in that "other" thread, it was stated more than once that F-BODYS, have never had more power than the top Corvette, and thats simply not true. Here are a couple of examples, the names have been removed to protect the guilty

A full production f body didn't meet the top dog vette of the time (ZR1, Z06, Grand Sport, and whatever others) in the horsepower numbers so leave that for a COPO form and companies like SLP, please.
An f-body coming straight from GM has never met the power level of a top level Corvette.
For many of those years, though I can't say for sure all of them, the Camaro had an optional engine w/ more power than the base Corvette, thats more in line w/ the Camaro LS7 question.

Originally Posted by dream '94 Z28
More recently, IIRC, didn't the '96 Camaro SS outpower the 'Vette by 5 hp? SS at 305, 'Vette at 300 (not counting the Gran Sport)
That's true too, forgot about that one. But the 300 hp was only for automatic vettes, all 6 speeds got the LT-4 that year, not just the Grand Sports. Maybe that made a difference, I don't know.

Last edited by CLEAN; 01-17-2006 at 11:01 AM.
Old 01-17-2006 | 11:05 AM
  #7  
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,801
From: Nashville, TN
Re: An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" questio

Originally Posted by CLEAN
Tis true, but in that "other" thread, it was stated more than once that F-BODYS, have never had more power than the top Corvette, and thats simply not true. Here are a couple of examples, the names have been removed to protect the guilty

.
Good point. This should be on mythbusters. I think some folks mistake the recent past for the entirety of history. Its suprising how little perspective some here can have.
Old 01-17-2006 | 11:13 AM
  #8  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
Re: An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" question

The ZL1 was faster than any Corvette in 69, they only made 2 ZL1 Corvette's IIRC. The L98 IROC-Z's and Z28's were close also, the 1LE and B4C cars were extremely close with everything factored in. If only L98 Camaro's got a manual. I'm sure many Corvette guys in GM wouldn't have liked that. The nonsense really has to stop or be minimized already, maybe even more than it was in the 4th Gen.
Old 01-17-2006 | 11:22 AM
  #9  
CLEAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,576
From: Arlington, Texas
Re: An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" question

The ZL1 Camaro was faster than a ZL1 Vette? And I would think an L-88 vette would still take down a ZL1 Camaro that year, only difference was an aluminum block vs iron as I recall, and the Camaro was a good bit heavier than a Vette to start with. That would be something to see!
Old 01-17-2006 | 11:29 AM
  #10  
jcamere94z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,512
From: Miami, FL, US
Re: An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" question

No reason why the top dog camaro can't have a a "de-tuned" 480 hp LS7.


Originally Posted by Fenster
Good info CLEAN. Its always been kinda dumb to me to say that the top f-car cannot have more hp b/c it will hurt Corvette sales, when most people that buy Corvettes are goin to buy them whether the Vette has more power or not. It's a Corvette. It doesn't matter whether the top "all out" car from the Camaro has more than the base Vette. The Vette is more about standing and status than hp to those guys.
even thought some people do buy the corvette for the same reason they would buy a boxser there are plenty of people that do buy the vettes for the great sport cars they are.
Old 01-17-2006 | 12:27 PM
  #11  
Eric77TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
Re: An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" question

Originally Posted by CLEAN
Year Trans Am top engine Corvette top engine
1972 SD-455 (300hp) LS5 (270hp)
I know this is kind of splitting hairs, but the 1972 Trans Am actually used the 455 H.O. (300hp). It was the only available Trans Am engine that year.
Old 01-17-2006 | 12:46 PM
  #12  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Re: An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" question

Therefore they should make the Firebird and not the Camaro.
Old 01-17-2006 | 12:59 PM
  #13  
OctaneZ28's Avatar
Disciple
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 873
From: Chicagoland, IL www.5thGen.org
Re: An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" question

Top level Camaro/Firebird has out-powered a base-level Corvette in the past, but the top-level Corvette always has top honors.

The 1969 ZL1s were serious machines, and I do believe the Corvette ZL1 was the better performer.
Old 01-17-2006 | 04:14 PM
  #14  
Sharker524's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 255
From: Warner Robins, GA
Re: An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" question

The Corvette hasn't even always been the top GM performer(not talking hp, talking performance, speed)...

Sy/Ty anyone?

Anything is possible, people saying the Camaro can't have more power than a base vette are FOS. H*ll, we don't even know how much hp the base vette will have in '08, '09,or '10.

No matter what, I'm betting on the top Camaro(Z28 :P) to get an s/c V8, be it LS2, L89, LS12(that has a good ring to it )...hah.
Old 01-17-2006 | 04:32 PM
  #15  
CLEAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,576
From: Arlington, Texas
Re: An "ender" to the "the fbody has never had more power than the top vette" question

Originally Posted by Eric77TA
I know this is kind of splitting hairs, but the 1972 Trans Am actually used the 455 H.O. (300hp). It was the only available Trans Am engine that year.
Indeed, I knew something didn't look right! Thanks!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 AM.