2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Fairly negative article on the new Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2009 | 03:07 PM
  #1  
HOTCIVIC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 279
From: Minneapolis
Fairly negative article on the new Camaro

Has this been posted yet?



Sexy as a swollen **** star on meth, twice as useless
Have you seen this thing? This sexy macho bloated Hot Wheels fantasia dreamgasm of a car-like drunken child's funbot crayon sketch?

No? Because it appears to be a vehicle that at least some across the Big Autosphere are still secretly praying, despite the sudden overthrow of -- despite the deadly ultimatum for -- General Motors, might yet prove to be a savior.

Indeed, it's a car some hope will maybe, just maybe sell like crazy and restore a tiny bit of faith in big, thick, meaty, rather inane American cars that have no real place in the new millennium, but which for some reason they keep building anyway, presumably because aging frat boys you should never, ever date think they're totally wickedcool and will therefore be willing to shell out 35 grand to own, unless they won't.

Am I talking about the ugly-as-a-giant-vacuum-cleaner Chevy Volt? Am I aiming this admittedly overheated verbiage at the ruddy, useless Impala? No, I am not.

I am talking about the brand new, leering, pseudo-masculine 2010 Chevrolet Camaro.

What's that you say? You had no idea that Chevy was resurrecting this rolling mullet from the mausoleum of the '70s because, even after sucking up billions in bailout money, GM still doesn't really have a single fresh and forward-thinking idea, and hence the best they can do is scrape the barrel of macho nostalgia in a desperate attempt to cater to male Boomers who drink too much light beer and think Maxim is the height of masculinity and are still debating which Van Halen vocalist totally ruled?

Well, they did. And it's here. And they don't. And it's David Lee Roth (of course). And it's worth noting because, well, this wild new Camaro will very likely be the last you will ever hear of U.S. automakers vying to be a kickass, world-dominating force in automotive inspiration. It is most certainly the last gasp of that overblown, yet much-beloved myth, affectionately known as the American muscle car.

Is it time? Can we finally just say it outright, even as we risk invoking the wrath of every true-blooded American gearhead from here to 1965? Oh hell, let's just do it: Good riddance.

Yes, this is just a little bit sad. This is a moment to pause in fond remembrance. You could say it's the end of an era, but of course it's an era that should've ended about 25 years ago. Oh well.

Do not misunderstand. Muscle cars and their pony car brethren -- all those Challengers, Road Runners, Mustangs, Novas, Trans Ams, Chevelles, GTOs et al -- have a hallowed and well-deserved place in American automotive lore. Nothing, not even the full-sized SUV, exemplified the lopsided American posture better. Power over finesse, weight over grace, peel-out ability over handling, go hard over stop quick, sword over pen, meat over vegetable, trade school over college, violent death over aging gracefully.

Forget for a moment that they were, by and large, dangerous, horribly built vehicles with dreadful chassis and zero engineering integrity. Doesn't matter. They were fast. They were wide. They had huge back seats perfect for impregnating various small-town teen cheerleaders. They got eight miles to the gallon and about nine to the quart of oil. They were cool. Sort of.

Not anymore.

Behold this weird new Camaro. It is, in sum, exactly the wrong car at exactly the wrong time with exactly the wrong attitude attached to exactly the wrong hopeless hope for a return to a rather crude automotive golden era that never really existed in the first place.

Why does this car exist at all? No one seems quite sure. But it is, if you spend a moment in the various car blogs, all flavors of a dumb, guilty pleasure, hotly discussed and awaited like a giant extra-large triple-cheese quadruple-meat pizza, ever since GM introduced it as a crazy concept car back in one of those years Before All Hope Died.

Early reviews? Somewhere between lukewarm and "Holy crap, this thing sucks far, far more than it should, especially the cramped, stifling interior. And the handling. And the brakes. And the build quality." Which is, as far as America cars go, about par for the course.

But what about that mean-*** exterior? All the retro car dudes just love the new Camaro's snarling looks, which lie somewhere between a cool flaming dragon your high school stoner friend used to sketch on his Pee-Chee folders, and what a Vegas stripper plays whilst dancing around a pole. Upshot: It's just like the Corvette; another car for 10-year-old boys trapped in 45-year-old bodies.

What, too harsh? Too negative? Not really. It's mostly a criticism borne of frustration. I truly am (or rather, was) hoping for something brilliant and inspiring to come from all that American talent. I was honestly hoping one of these companies would come up with a new idea to save all those jobs (Ford is close), to resurrect the industry and prove we can be nimble and viable and revolutionary.

(Does it sound like I could be talking about my very own media/newspaper biz? The coincidence is not accidental. Similar infuriating problems plague both worlds, with solutions equally elusive).

So maybe what the 2010 Camaro really is, is a fitting death knell, a kitschy cool car that takes American automobile full circle even as it circles the drain. It's the final sign that it's time to look beyond Big Auto for any sort of true revolution or evolution, toward individuals, entrepreneurs, startups, inventors and aging hippie rock stars to solve it all for us.

Wait, what? Why sure. Have a glance, if you will, over at crusty ol' Neil Young, who loves his cars big and his grunge anthems bigger. Neil has already successfully converted his massive, two-ton '59 Lincoln Continental into a biodiesel/electric hybrid hellbeast of the future. His company is called LincVolt, and it's aiming for nothing less than the automotive X-Prize. Who says the future has to be all tiny and wimpy and Prius-y?

Or you could check in with someone like Shai Agassi, the 40-year-old Israeli entrepreneur and CEO of Better Place, a very, very well-funded startup that aims to create a definitive, international "smart" network of electric car charging/battery swapping stations, an elegant meta-grid based around some hugely forward-thinking, Earth-friendly principles. Could it work? Damn right it could. It's already underway.

Of course, if hot, futuristic car design is all you seek, if you really want inspiration and new ideas in automotive design, you skip right past American cars and look to the same place we've always looked: Europe.

Here, for but one small example, is some odd French industrial/energy conglomerate called Bolloré, who hooked in with Italian design gods Pininfarina to leapfrog right over the traditional car manufacturers and, well, create the damn revolution themselves.

Their invention: the B0, AKA the Bluecar, a tiny, gorgeous, all-electric thing that looks like a Ferrari smashed into a Smart car at the Apple Store.

The Bluecar was originally designed as a concept car, to showcase Bolloré's fuel-cell technology. But the thing came out so well, they decided to manufacture it themselves. And so they are. You can pre-order one right now.

Oh, not in the U.S., of course. We almost never get cars like this. Or more accurately, we almost never get ideas like this. What do we get? We get the Volt. We get the Camaro. We get buried.

But hey, at least we look sort of cool doing it, right?
I like the fact he thinks the Bluecar is "gorgeous".



Rrrrrrriiiiiiight.....

Last edited by HOTCIVIC; 04-03-2009 at 09:12 AM.
Old 04-02-2009 | 03:11 PM
  #2  
JeremyNYR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 578
From: Cheektowaga, NY (Buffalo)
That's hardly an article. It looks more like the ramblings of a bitter message board junkie. And anyone that likes that..that thing pictured, well it just makes sense that they wouldn't like the Camaro.
Old 04-02-2009 | 03:23 PM
  #3  
JeremyNYR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 578
From: Cheektowaga, NY (Buffalo)
LOL, i just looked at the link and the picture of the author and it all makes sense. I thought it sounded like a girl writing it because of the "boyfriend" reference and affinity for bland, boring vehicles. Well I was on the right track... it's from the San Fransisco Cronicle and the author looks like he probably hit on a guy driving a Camaro in High School and got a foot up his *** instead of what he really wanted up there. No wonder the pornstar on meth was so useless to him! hehe

Last edited by JeremyNYR; 04-02-2009 at 03:27 PM.
Old 04-02-2009 | 03:34 PM
  #4  
HuJass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,224
From: CNY
Maybe it's time to flood this you-know-what's comment section & e-mail with the rest of the world's view.
Old 04-02-2009 | 03:37 PM
  #5  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
The article is a steaming pile of you-know-what, then again, consider the source (San Francisco).

Who exactly has ever said the Camaro would "save" GM? I think I stopped reading right after that hot mess of failed logic. Whatever happened to simply reviewing a car based on its merits against its competitors, not making some rambling grandeose statement of your political/economic/environmental/social views?
Old 04-02-2009 | 03:38 PM
  #6  
HOTCIVIC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 279
From: Minneapolis
Early reviews? Somewhere between lukewarm and "Holy crap, this thing sucks far, far more than it should, especially the cramped, stifling interior. And the handling. And the brakes. And the build quality." Which is, as far as America cars go, about par for the course.
I'm wondering what reviews he's talking about here? Every review I've read on the Camaro has been very positive. Just goes to show he's talking completely out of his ***.
Old 04-02-2009 | 04:08 PM
  #7  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by HOTCIVIC
I'm wondering what reviews he's talking about here? Every review I've read on the Camaro has been very positive. Just goes to show he's talking completely out of his ***.
Like I said, this isn't an automotive review, it is a steaming pile of lies and agendas. Might be time to fire off a letter or two.
Old 04-02-2009 | 04:13 PM
  #8  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Read some of the replies to the article.

FWIW, Sfgate.com is the online version of the San Francisco Chronicle, a very liberal skewed periodical, which is losing money and is in the process of going bankrupt. I think Mr. Morford is just bitter in general.

Then again, it was published on April 1st.

Last edited by jg95z28; 04-02-2009 at 04:15 PM.
Old 04-02-2009 | 04:30 PM
  #9  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
No need to stoop to internet trolling levels.

The way I see it, I don't go criticizing someone's quantum physics theories because I am not equipped to do so. In other words, focus on the glowing reviews of the 2010 Camaro that are done by actual automobile journalists, and not people who write "Notes & Errata" columns.
Old 04-02-2009 | 04:56 PM
  #10  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
He called the Volt ugly. I bet he loves the Prius and Insight though. 'Cause they aren't made by "American" companies.

God d*mn it, I am sick of this bull***t, hippy, hate-America attitude that is spreading like a cancer...

I couldn't even read the whole thing.
Old 04-02-2009 | 05:04 PM
  #11  
3rdGenNut's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 218
That was the worse case of ***** envy i've ever read.
Old 04-02-2009 | 05:34 PM
  #12  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
He called the Volt ugly. I bet he loves the Prius and Insight though. 'Cause they aren't made by "American" companies.
And he called that "Bluecar" thing (which HotCivic posted a picture of) gorgeous and compares aspects of it to a Ferrari (???). A part of me wants to think that some aspects of his article were written as an April Fools Day joke (the Volt resembles any of the other alt. energy cars).

Ahh well. The fact that people like this don't "get" Camaro and cars of that ilk is what MAKES them cool.
Old 04-02-2009 | 05:56 PM
  #13  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,576
From: Arlington, Texas
I'm going to get me one of those bumper stickers that Lt. Dan had on his wheelchair "America, love it or leave it"
Old 04-02-2009 | 06:34 PM
  #14  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Okay, guys...stereotypical insults should be left elsewhere as we have people from all walks of life here who disagree with the article as well.
Old 04-02-2009 | 06:56 PM
  #15  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
That is a political statement - not an automotive review.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 AM.