2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Firebird kit for the Camaro CONFIRMED!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2009 | 11:54 AM
  #1  
RickFenix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2
From: Green Bay, WI
Firebird kit for the Camaro CONFIRMED!

For those of us F-body guys that drive "the other F-Body", this is pretty exciting news. In a fun spirit similar to trash talking about a sibling, I have often said I would never buy a Camaro because I am a Firebird guy. Looks like I may have to change my tune.

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/12/c...ng-for-camaro/
Old 08-14-2009 | 01:40 PM
  #2  
blown94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,228
From: Florida
This would definitely interest me in buying a new camaro now,.....just to convert it. You would think GM would have seen the opportunity for this vehicle to keep it in production,......even if the submarine the rest of pontiac. Theres alot of dedicated TA enthusiasts like myslelf, that wouldn't buy a camaro, but if it had a TA body kit, they likely would. I was wondering who and when it would happen.
Old 08-14-2009 | 03:37 PM
  #3  
HuJass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,224
From: CNY
I gotta believe that the "Pontiac" name can't be anywhere on the car. Nor could the name "Trans Am" or the Pontiac arrowhead. I would think that there might be a problem using "T/A" as well, as Pontiac used it in the late '70s and Mopar used it in the early '70s.

I wonder what these kits will look like. Will they be high quality stuff so that the car looks factory or will they be cheesy, like so many of the aftermarket body kits?
And which design are they going to do?
And how much?
And why no Honeycomb or Rally II wheels?

I guess we'll have to wait until the Trans Am nats.
Old 08-14-2009 | 04:06 PM
  #4  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
as much as i loved my 99 trans am, i have to give this one to the camaro. that trans am doesnt looks nearly as good as the camaro. its not done right. just looks like their meshing 2 styles together. a little bit of late 60's with late 70's. sorry, i dont like it.
Old 08-14-2009 | 04:18 PM
  #5  
supernova1972's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 190
From: Indianpolis, IN
I bet it will look like a crappy body kit.
Old 08-14-2009 | 04:48 PM
  #6  
Ed 2001 SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 499
From: Miami, Fl USA
Doesn't the name "Trans Am" belong to the SCCA? If so, who is to stop them from authorizing this company to use the name for this body kit?
Old 08-14-2009 | 05:08 PM
  #7  
lcmc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 35
Why ruin a nice car!
Old 08-14-2009 | 08:38 PM
  #8  
HuJass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,224
From: CNY
Originally Posted by Ed 2001 SS
Doesn't the name "Trans Am" belong to the SCCA? If so, who is to stop them from authorizing this company to use the name for this body kit?
Does it still?

Could GM have some sort of secondary licensing agreement for the name?

So far, the company hasn't really referred to it as the Trans Am. I think they're calling it the "Phoenix T/A"
Old 08-14-2009 | 10:55 PM
  #9  
sbca96's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 273
From: Santa Barbara, Ca
This is a no-brainer, I am surprised that GM didnt offer it from their resources.
The Firebird has always been a Camaro in disguise, why not go this route? It
has been all over the media, peoples guesses as to what the Firebird will look
like. I would think that some large aftermarket company like Saleen or other
would do this. No matter what its got to be better then the Chevelle that had
been made from the '04-06 GTO.



Tom
Old 08-15-2009 | 05:24 AM
  #10  
TOO Z MAXX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 666
From: Stockton, Ca. USA
I think SCCA still owns the name Trans Am and they also let the contract between GM and SCCA die.
Old 08-15-2009 | 10:20 AM
  #11  
96 Z 28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 640
From: East Granby CT
I think it looks pretty good I also see T-Tops??? If they offered that as an option they might really get some interest
Old 08-15-2009 | 01:22 PM
  #12  
Ed 2001 SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 499
From: Miami, Fl USA
sbca96, that is the most hideous thing I've seen all year.
Old 08-15-2009 | 05:49 PM
  #13  
bigsjk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 98
From: Toronto, Canada
Exclamation Ummm...the headlights?

No flip up headlights? Not a Firebird...sorry.
Stupid daytime running light rules!!!
Old 08-15-2009 | 09:57 PM
  #14  
johnny6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,143
From: SC
Originally Posted by Ed 2001 SS
sbca96, that is the most hideous thing I've seen all year.
If cars could look mentally retarded that would definitely be one of them
Old 08-16-2009 | 05:53 AM
  #15  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,372
From: Kilgore TX 75662
Wink

Originally Posted by bigsjk
No flip up headlights? Not a Firebird...sorry.
Stupid daytime running light rules!!!
yeah, because ALL generation of Firebird had flip up headlights?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 AM.