2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Free mods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2007 | 12:00 PM
  #1  
number77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Free mods

As for this upcoming car, if GM was to build in free mods, how much power would you like them to release? Or would you rather have that power from the getgo?
Old 04-10-2007 | 12:05 PM
  #2  
jaguar5822's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 192
From: San Antonio, TX
Build in as many free mods as possible. That way the power is lower for a typical consumer and keeps insurance costs down for us 22 yr olds ( not that I could afford one for at least 3 more years lol). Then when you get it, free mods for us enthusiasts. Maybe give us a nice HP engine, with a lot of plastic blockage in teh intake to keep factory HP numbers lower lol.
Old 04-10-2007 | 12:05 PM
  #3  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
I'd rather them not waste their resources "over-engineering" things, and just make the car work good right from the start . I mean, obviously we're not getting LT headers from the factory (those days are long gone ) but the car shouldn't have ~2.5" exhaust, nor should it have an intake that squeezes the air through a straw, or feeds the air through a tiny slit behind the radiator .
Old 04-10-2007 | 12:07 PM
  #4  
jaguar5822's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 192
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by Capn Pete
I'd rather them not waste their resources "over-engineering" things, and just make the car work good right from the start . I mean, obviously we're not getting LT headers from the factory (those days are long gone ) but the car shouldn't have ~2.5" exhaust, nor should it have an intake that squeezes the air through a straw, or feeds the air through a tiny slit behind the radiator .
lol your post goes perfect with mine except I think the stock exhaust should be skinny too so we can unlock more power from stock. But I agree completely with the air coming behind the radiator, though I don't have to worry about that After 7 years I think they owe us a little over-engineering

Last edited by jaguar5822; 04-10-2007 at 12:27 PM.
Old 04-10-2007 | 01:58 PM
  #5  
Ron78Z&01SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 639
From: Wichita, Kansas
I seriously doubt they will purposely build in "free" mods. When this is released, we'll be looking at Pony Car (is that term obsolete now?) HP wars between Chevy, Ford, Dodge and whoever else. Why in the hell would GM build in free mods to keep the HP down just so some people could save money on insurance.

Most of the free mods done to cars are just ways to correct the shortcuts/oversights/cost prohibitions that occur during desigh/production (porting intake plenum immediately behind TB on TPI cars, grinding down bump stop on LS1 TB), doing away with features designed into car for "worst case" driving conditions (TB bypass, early MAF heatsink removal, MAF screen removal, baffling removal in intake tract originally meant to prevent water ingestion), or to work around EPA/emissions issues (CAGS bypass, IAT resistor).

Will there be free mods? Sure, if you're willing to do away with or modify certain "reliability" or features that were engineered into the car for whatever reason by GM. Hopefully GM will catch any design "oversights" and not make too many design sacrifices just to save a few bucks here and there on each car built.

Not to be a jerk, but building in free mods?......come on get real.

....okay, I guess I DID come across like a jerk.
Old 04-10-2007 | 02:39 PM
  #6  
jaguar5822's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 192
From: San Antonio, TX
Don't worry I'm pretty hard to offend. But in the "HP wars", why would companies underrate the actual power of engines? The only reason I can think of is for insurance purposes and so that when the vehicle is tested, it out performs the other car with the same HP on paper, because it has more power than that in actualality.

Also, detuning can help the car pass the EPA standards, the same reason that many European sports cars are detuned for the US. Ever notice how some cars with a Hypertech or other tuning program get actual power, while others see negligible results?
Old 04-10-2007 | 03:07 PM
  #7  
Ron78Z&01SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 639
From: Wichita, Kansas
Agreed.
But that was then, this is now.....at least I hope so.

But even if that was the case now, wouldn't it be easier/cheaper to just under estimate the power output as opposed to specifically engineering "tricks" into the car to shave power from the factory so that a power hungry owner can "fix" it after they take possession?

I agree with you 100% on the tuning issue. I think that would DEFINITELY be the easiest/cheapest way to knock the power down a bit if GM needed to for some reason.
Old 04-10-2007 | 03:19 PM
  #8  
2000GTP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,312
From: Aurora, IL
The free-mods that some of us do I don't think are purposely done by GM, just that is what comes as a way to meet different climates, fuel economy, emissions, noise levels, ect.
Old 04-22-2007 | 01:27 AM
  #9  
Bayer-Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,594
From: N Falmouth MA
As the LSx platform has proven, the usuals are expected from me.

I'm expecting TB Bypass and/or the EGR mod. Maybe 10-15 hp. We'll find, em tho..
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alex5366
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
03-08-2015 12:32 PM
Caps94ZODG
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
25
10-02-2003 07:30 AM
Fusion93Z
Car Audio and Electronics
0
09-10-2002 07:46 PM
Thebeast431
Car Audio and Electronics
3
08-25-2002 06:06 PM
GC456
Site Help and Suggestions
2
08-09-2002 12:53 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.