2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

The gauntlet...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-2007 | 09:25 PM
  #76  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
this just in from Detroit..........


..........the sky is falling.



Damn skippy. Algore said so.
Old 11-25-2007 | 09:57 PM
  #77  
formula79's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
I don't think that Ford has the money to make half the changes to the Mustang you listed after seeing the half assed "refreashed" 09 F-150. If they can't spend the money on the truck that pays the bills despite it quickly being a back of the pack performer...I don't see them selling a ton on the Mustang that will sell well as long as they put a horse in the grill.

I get so tired of people whining about weight and the Camaro. How many people say...man this car is 200lbs too heavy...no way I am buying it. Handling and performance is more than just weight. An M3 coupe with an assload of aluminum that is too expensive for the Camaro steill weighs 3650lbs. I would say for the Camaro to be 150-200lbs of that is acceptable.
Old 11-25-2007 | 10:21 PM
  #78  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by notgetleft
From one angle, that may be true.

IMO, if the base camaro can't attract 'those' types of people, it will be DOA.
I agree. For me it's not much of a stretch to imagine all the young people who I see driving V6 Mustangs, considering a turbo 4 Genesis for about the same price. The very same people which GM would like to get into a base Camaro.
Old 11-25-2007 | 10:29 PM
  #79  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by formula79
How many people say...man this car is 200lbs too heavy...no way I am buying it. .
Umm, that would be me....
Old 11-25-2007 | 11:28 PM
  #80  
formula79's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
The same person who wanted a Colorado based breadwagon? You are a die hard enthusiast for sure, but not an example of the buyer that Camaro needs to win over.

Honestly, if it looks hot, and turns people on they will buy it. I have a Camaro die cast in my office, and every day someone who walks in stops to look at it and tell me how hot the new Camaro is. That sells cars...not a 200lb weight difference.

Originally Posted by Z284ever
Umm, that would be me....
Old 11-26-2007 | 12:27 AM
  #81  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by formula79
The same person who wanted a Colorado based breadwagon? You are a die hard enthusiast for sure, but not an example of the buyer that Camaro needs to win over.

Honestly, if it looks hot, and turns people on they will buy it. I have a Camaro die cast in my office, and every day someone who walks in stops to look at it and tell me how hot the new Camaro is. That sells cars...not a 200lb weight difference.

Oh, you mean a Colorado based Nomad? Not sure I really make the connection here on that.

Anyway, a hot looking car gets people noticing, and some people will buy simply for that reason alone. However, in a limited volume segment - where EVERY PLAYER has a hot looking car - looks alone makes you nothing more than an also ran.


This weight thing you bring up Branden, is so damned important. And I don't mean the obvious acceleration, handling, braking and steering metrics - where every pound you add, flushes abit more of all of those good things down the crapper.

I'm talking about CAFE for one. Let me guaranfreakintee you, if Camaro comes in overweight, it WILL absolutely still meet CAFE no matter what it takes. Even if getting there now means a 2.29 rear gear, 100 less horsepower and less displacement to make up for that extra weight.

It'll be the same story for emissions, which BTW, will be getting much tougher early next decade. More mass equals more emissions. It WILL pass emissions - you can figure out the rest.

200 pounds? Yeah, I'm sure plenty of people won't care, and you've just declared yourself as being one of them. But that extra 200 lbs will make the difference between Camaro being a class leader in performance, efficiency and street cred, or just another stylish coupe in a very crowded field.

Last edited by Z284ever; 11-26-2007 at 12:33 AM.
Old 11-26-2007 | 01:23 AM
  #82  
boxerperson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 233
Originally Posted by Shockwave
I'd also be curious as to where you found the curb weight specs on the Hyundai.

I think it will be a good car, but demographic-wise not a likely threat to the Camaro. Most buyers I see of the Hyundai are going to be kids that spent way too much time playing Need for Speed that suddenly land medium-rung tech sector jobs. In other words, if they don't buy the Genesis, I think we'd find most of these guys behind the wheel of a Honda.
Hyundai released them to Car and Driver. 3500.
Old 11-26-2007 | 01:29 AM
  #83  
boxerperson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 233
Originally Posted by Rampant
The expected shortened wheelbase doesn't necessarily mean much lighter. Look at the 135/335 comparison. The 1 is much smaller, but only 200# lighter. There is no way Nissan will make the Z that much smaller than it currently is, so weight savings from size will only be minimal.

Also, after what Nissan did with the G (3700#), I am even doubting it will be lighter at all -- especially if they use a modified G37 chassis. Nissan clearly is not concerned about light weight vehicles right now.

Too bad too, because a lightweight Z would be a fantastic car.
The G37 platform recieved extra strengthening bars in Coupe form. The 4 door G37 is actually 100 pounds lighter. The highly disguised Z-car that's been seen testing alongside Z4 Coupes and Caymans is more than 9 inches shorter than the 350Z, which is in turn significantly shorter than the G37 Coupe. Nissan of Japan already admitted that while the Z performs well, it's too heavy compared with it's competition, and made weight savings THE priority for the next Z-car. They're also concerned about the G37 cannibalizing sales of the Z-car, since they're essentially the same car, and it makes sense that they would make the difference between the two as large as possible with the upcoming generation. Hence: Significantly smaller, lighter and less practical. An enthusiasts car. You want a GT? Get the G37. That's the strategy.
Old 11-26-2007 | 01:37 AM
  #84  
boxerperson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 233
Originally Posted by formula79
I don't think that Ford has the money to make half the changes to the Mustang you listed after seeing the half assed "refreashed" 09 F-150. If they can't spend the money on the truck that pays the bills despite it quickly being a back of the pack performer...I don't see them selling a ton on the Mustang that will sell well as long as they put a horse in the grill.

I get so tired of people whining about weight and the Camaro. How many people say...man this car is 200lbs too heavy...no way I am buying it. Handling and performance is more than just weight. An M3 coupe with an assload of aluminum that is too expensive for the Camaro steill weighs 3650lbs. I would say for the Camaro to be 150-200lbs of that is acceptable.
Within 150-200lbs of the M3 equals 3800-3850lbs. Completely unacceptable, would never purchase it if it were that heavy. Not a chance.....don't care what it does in the quarter or on the skidpad. It won't feel great while it does it at that weight.

The M3 is heavy cuz they're using a silly high tech V-8 which weighs a lot, putting tons of sound deadening material in it, running stupid-big wheels, and have it loaded with like 40 airbags and a ridiculous amount of "luxury" equipment. The CSL version will be much better, probably 200 pounds lighter, since it gets rid of the crap. The camaro needs to be under 3700lbs.

Will it sell great if it comes in at a higher weight but keeps the awesome styling? Yep, it will. I don't care. I won't pay for it. How many copies of the car I own a company is able to move doesn't matter to me at all.

Here's hoping Fbodyfather and the guys at Chevy can keep the weight in check, because I'd love to have the new Camaro. But I simply will lose all interest if it's an overweight porker.

Last edited by boxerperson; 11-26-2007 at 01:41 AM.
Old 11-26-2007 | 07:32 AM
  #85  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
I have to agree with Brandon that so long as the car looks good and handled well, the average buyer won't care if it weighs 3500 lbs or 3900 lbs.

I'll care....a lot. I'm sure others will to. But the masses won't, IMHO. For evidence, consider that they don't seem to care that Mustang only makes 300 HP, still uses a live axle, and doesn't ever perform up to the level of a 1998 Camaro - its logical competition.

Sad (from my perspective) but likely true.

Bob
Old 11-26-2007 | 09:56 AM
  #86  
Cheap Guy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
Car and Driver Review on Hyundai Coupe

To add to the above post about the so-called Mustang competitor from Hyundai - Info from the 01/09 Car and Driver:

Engine: DOHC V6, 231 CI/3.78L
Power: 300 hp
Torque: 263 lbs.
0-60: 5.9
WB: 111 in.
Lg: 182.3
Width: 73.4
Ht: 54.3

The article says 25k for the base model, but it's kind of confusing as to whether it's the base V6 or the base four cylinder 200 plus hp.

I really don't see this as a competitor to a V8 Camaro, but it may be for the base Camaro. Hell, my 1997 V6 Camaro had 200 hp ten years ago, and my current stock 97 LT1 Z28 does 0-60 in at least 6 seconds.

Having said all that, it's a pretty ugly car to me.
Old 11-26-2007 | 10:01 AM
  #87  
Silverado C-10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,897
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
this just in from Detroit..........


..........the sky is falling.



GREAT! Now Toyota is throwing Saturn Sky's off of buildings to sell trucks?
Old 11-26-2007 | 10:12 AM
  #88  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by Cheap Guy
The article says 25k for the base model, but it's kind of confusing as to whether it's the base V6 or the base four cylinder 200 plus hp.
I'm thinking that's a misprint on the cost of the base model.
Old 11-26-2007 | 10:18 AM
  #89  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
I'll care....a lot. I'm sure others will to. But the masses won't, IMHO. For evidence, consider that they don't seem to care that Mustang only makes 300 HP, still uses a live axle, and doesn't ever perform up to the level of a 1998 Camaro - its logical competition.
I chalk that up to the fact that Mustang has been unencumbered by any direct competition for the past half decade.
Old 11-26-2007 | 10:29 AM
  #90  
Silverado C-10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,897
From: Greenville, SC
^ I saw a commercial for 3K back or "off" all GT mustangs.... that makes a GT only 23K. If I wasn't waiting for a Camaro I'd probably get me a GT this month. I LOVE the '05+ mustangs. I'd buy a windevil blue GT with a 5 speed and white stripes.

Anyway, my point, sales must have slowed, not a good sign... slowing sales and too many new offerings. Meh, like I said, I'll still have mine



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM.