2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Good god guys get a grip!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-2008 | 05:19 PM
  #301  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
If I went to a Mustang site and did the reverse, I'd be banned within a few days.
Are you suggesting that anyone who voices a negative opinion about Camaro be banned?

You're right, I guess there isn't much to say about weight anymore. Would you like to hear my take on the interior? Probably not. Let's just say I really do like the exterior and leave it at that.

By the way, Charlie's guesses that the 5th Gen won't have a run similar in length to the previous three generations are based on what I would consider to be a pretty solid business and market analysis. Don't take it so personally. We're all hoping this car does well for a few years so that it paves the way for a bright future for Camaro long past the run of Zeta cars.
Old 07-26-2008 | 05:24 PM
  #302  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
Orphaned architecture? Oh you mean the one that made the G8 a rock-solid GT sedan, which is selling very well and making its current owners bust out in stupid grins? That architecture?
The G8 is not built here. You will soon have an architecture in Zeta that is being built in one North American plant at much lower than capable numbers for that plant. That's what he's getting at. Frankly, it's a recipe that starts to sound frighteningly close to St. Therese.
Old 07-26-2008 | 05:28 PM
  #303  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
Are you suggesting that anyone who voices a negative opinion about Camaro be banned?
Repeating myself from earlier in this thread...

Originally Posted by JasonD
This also is the last site on the Internet to use to degrade the car and the people who worked on it for any reason. There is a difference between being negative and offering constructive criticism.

This site is PRO-CAMARO, has been for the last 12 years and isn't about to change now. One should be able to infer that from the name of the site alone. If you disagree with this, you shouldn't even be here to read this message in the first place.
Look at how this thread started and then look where it went and why. People who are here to drag everyone else down, shouldn't be. Take that any way you like it.
Old 07-26-2008 | 05:55 PM
  #304  
flowmotion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,502
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
You see, this is the kind of GM cynicism that frankly, is annoying to many fans. The 4gens, despite their relatively crude assembly by today's standards, sold for nine years. I believe the new Camaro will also enjoy a long and successful life.
A nine or ten year run would be exceptionally long by modern standards. Other than the New Beetle and maybe cargo vans, I can't think of any car which has stayed on the market for that long. Back in the 70s/80s yes, today no. Also, all due respect, but the 4th gens aren't a very good example, for reasons that have been covered here repeatedly.
Old 07-26-2008 | 05:58 PM
  #305  
Dan Baldwin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 356
From: Providence, RI, USA
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
Sorry but I feel compelled to ask... do you work for the government?
No, I develop, design and engineer motor vehicles for a living. Vehicle architecture, suspension geometry, design and analysis of frame and other primary structures, etc.

I did formerly work for Lockheed Martin (advanced structures), which given the gummint's support of the military-industrial complex could be considered a form of "working for the Government".
Old 07-26-2008 | 06:04 PM
  #306  
Dan Baldwin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 356
From: Providence, RI, USA
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
My point was 1999 Camaro SS/1LE versus 1999 Corvette Z51 -- the 1LE was faster - not only at Milford, but at DPG as well......yet the Camaro was heavier and had a weight distribution disadvantage. (same driver....)

Yes -- weight in and of itself is a disadvantage -- but chassis tuning can be a real advantage.................
If the Z51 was on OEM's run-flats and the Camaro on KD's, the 1LE's real advantage was TIRES.

Suffice it to say, on similar DOT competition tires, and with similar driver talent, 1LE Camaros are NOT faster than same-year Corvettes in autoX competition.

Still, point taken that excessive weight can be overcome if given other advantages.
Old 07-26-2008 | 06:06 PM
  #307  
Dan Baldwin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 356
From: Providence, RI, USA
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
So - you are still here, to school GM engineers on how they should design the NEXT generation of Camaro? Do you realize how utterly ridiculous that sounds?
The truth is, I am here exclusively for your entertainment
Old 07-26-2008 | 06:11 PM
  #308  
8Banger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 362
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Is that so? Want to elaborate?
There is nothing really to elaborate. Your continued bashing of the weight of this car is not the view of most people who will buy this car. I would venture
to say only a fraction of the potential buyers are even concerned. You see, us
as a group up here don't represent squat compared to all the potential buyers,
and the majority of folks up here are not freaking out over the weight. I guess
what it boils down to is that if everyone who thinks like you did not buy a
Camaro, the sales missed would not even being noticed.
Old 07-26-2008 | 06:17 PM
  #309  
8Banger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 362
Originally Posted by Raven99
I am soo happy the F-Body lives on. But it is not the car for me.
I got news for you. The F-body is NOT living on. This is not an F-body, not
even close.

Last edited by 8Banger; 07-26-2008 at 06:22 PM.
Old 07-26-2008 | 06:21 PM
  #310  
8Banger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 362
Originally Posted by JasonD
People who are here to drag everyone else down, shouldn't be. Take that any way you like it.
Exactly, go **** on someone else's parade.
Old 07-26-2008 | 07:09 PM
  #311  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by Dan Baldwin
Because they are almost all going down the same path of bigger bigger bigger cars. But this trend is ending, and anyone with an ounce of foresight saw it coming. In my view, the Camaro was a huge opportunity to be on the RIGHT side of the new trend toward higher mpg vehicles. Opportunity lost...
If you'd been on here in 2002 saying that in 2008, the demand for SUVs over the previous 20 years would stop, and the small cars that had been languishing for 20 years would suddenly be in demand, I'd give you 100% credit.

But at this point, all I can say is that the hindsight crystal ball works really well.

An ounce of foresight saw it coming -- yes. But you would have needed much more to say exactly when it was coming.

For all we knew 10 years ago, it wasn't coming until 2018, or it was coming in 2002.
Old 07-26-2008 | 07:16 PM
  #312  
1BADCAM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13
Twice in one day!!!


I found this site by searching next generation camaro because I was hungry for any information on the new Camaro. I was impessed with all the people that were just as eager as I. I guess not to many people were thinking realisticly when it came to weight. I read about how alot of you were hoping for a 6 speed tranny when I would be happy with 5 and a 5th Gen. And when there were hints of an LS 3 I didnt know weather to **** or go blind I was so happy (I did neither)But though it all I held no hopes that this car was going to be lighter than a Mudstain dont get me wrong they are good looking cars just not me! I have been enthusiastic untill now ask yourself just how many people do the same search that I did to find out about this car and are reading this pissing and moaning about weight that you should have expected to begin with!!! You all say you want this car to do well but you couldnt prove it by me AN OUTSIDER that joined for information!!!

I figure this site might make up maybe .4% of Camaro sales but you could be 100% responsible for killing the car before it even gets started!
From what I gather I dont see too many people on this site that cant afford a new car well my hopes are for high production #s so I can maybe buy a used 5th Gen!

If you want the car to do well can the negetivity I have never drove 1 but take a look at the spec sheet again remember all th things you wanted in the car and be realistic I actually wanted a stripper(check my posts its there) why because I didnt have my head in the sand about the weight of the car!!!


From what I see in the spec sheet I see alot of hours of design work! anything unexpected was a pleasure if I could I would buy everyone that spent countless hours a beer and I dont drink!

My point is alot of people are reading if you dont like the car you and your money can go to Mustang .com and P&M there Misery loves company I guess!
Old 07-26-2008 | 07:20 PM
  #313  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
I think people should take a deep breath and remember that this is the ONLY place on the web where semi-intelligent people can "debate" matters Camaro.....that being said, I don't want this place to turn into a cheerleader's paradise either.

Dan, Charlie, Bob and others have very valid points as they relate to what the Camaro "could" have been.......but that being said, now that we know what the Camaro "is" we need to concentrate our energy on what possibly can be done, either OEM or aftermarket to make the car into something more of what we, individually want from it.

I'd like nothing more than to get into a serious discussion with people like Doug Houlihan and other platform engineers as to what they would have done, given more of a budget or less of a cost constraint.

Whenever someone mentions making something lighter, the end cost is always brought up.....while that is true, it's also true that 'some of us' (true Z/28 zealots) would be willing to pay a premium for a car that is lighter and therefore would perform better even without a different engine.....of course part of the premium has to be for better suspension pieces....nothing comes free

That's why I asked on one of these threads (can't remember which at the moment...I'm old ya' know) ....If the SC'd LSA engine and it's accompanying reinforcements might add a $15k premium to an SS Package........then what say we take $5k of that for even better suspension pieces and the remaining $10k be spent on lightening efforts...i.e. more uses of aluminum in suspension control arms, IRS and engine cradles, Titanium mufflers and of course de-contenting might help to offset some of the costs.....

If we could get our minds together and come up with a list of ideas and questions, I'll see that we get them to those who might have a response......even if it's a dead end street.

Now, let's get past the p*ssin' contest before everyone gets wet and move onto something 'constructive'.

Last edited by Doug Harden; 07-26-2008 at 07:23 PM.
Old 07-26-2008 | 07:20 PM
  #314  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by Z284ever
First Scott, let's get something straight - when have I hurled insults toward you and your co-workers? When and what did I say? I haven't. I've been taking from shots from you though, and that's fine, I can hack it.
Remember the thread a couple of weeks ago when I mentioned how you came across? And how negatively you reacted?

Some of your posts are either insulting or full of hyperbole, which can come across as insulting even when not intended that way.

On the other hand, I see Scott reacting pretty calmly for the most part.

From what I've seen, Charlie, you don't like criticism, though you've very quick to hand it out.

Take that for what it's worth to you (and I think I know what that is, which is why I'm wrapping this post up now ).
Old 07-26-2008 | 07:24 PM
  #315  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by 1BADCAM
Twice in one day!!!


I found this site by searching next generation camaro because I was hungry for any information on the new Camaro. I was impessed with all the people that were just as eager as I. I guess not to many people were thinking realisticly when it came to weight. I read about how alot of you were hoping for a 6 speed tranny when I would be happy with 5 and a 5th Gen. And when there were hints of an LS 3 I didnt know weather to **** or go blind I was so happy (I did neither)But though it all I held no hopes that this car was going to be lighter than a Mudstain dont get me wrong they are good looking cars just not me! I have been enthusiastic untill now ask yourself just how many people do the same search that I did to find out about this car and are reading this pissing and moaning about weight that you should have expected to begin with!!! You all say you want this car to do well but you couldnt prove it by me AN OUTSIDER that joined for information!!!

I figure this site might make up maybe .4% of Camaro sales but you could be 100% responsible for killing the car before it even gets started!
From what I gather I dont see too many people on this site that cant afford a new car well my hopes are for high production #s so I can maybe buy a used 5th Gen!

If you want the car to do well can the negetivity I have never drove 1 but take a look at the spec sheet again remember all th things you wanted in the car and be realistic I actually wanted a stripper(check my posts its there) why because I didnt have my head in the sand about the weight of the car!!!


From what I see in the spec sheet I see alot of hours of design work! anything unexpected was a pleasure if I could I would buy everyone that spent countless hours a beer and I dont drink!

My point is alot of people are reading if you dont like the car you and your money can go to Mustang .com and P&M there Misery loves company I guess!
Everyone tends to notice the squeaky wheels. Probably the best thing to do in this case is to ignore them instead of trying to oil them, but knowing what's best and doing it are two different things.

I actually think that most people on this site are happy about the car.

In any case, the internet is full of noise, because it's free to post. Try not to let it affect you.


Quick Reply: Good god guys get a grip!!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.