View Poll Results: All things being equal, which would you buy in 2011
4,000 lbs Camaro
108
65.45%
3,500 lbs Mustang
23
13.94%
I'd buy something else.
34
20.61%
Voters: 165. You may not vote on this poll
Here's a weight poll for you guys.
#198
Guys, it's not like a Chevy engineer is sitting in a dark back room with an evil grin on his face figuring out new places he can hide additional weight in the car. Crash safety guidelines have tightened up, and that's a big part of what's adding weight to modern cars. Welcome to the modern age, where the government is your mother.
#199
Hopefully it will have a much bigger impact on the weight than the "smaller" Challenger did coming from the Charger.
#200
Not that a Camaro will be near 4,000lbs, but the GT500 weighs in @ 3900+ and still manages respectable Lightning Lap times, according to Car & Driver, compared to much lighter cars.
So, how much worse would a hundred or so odd pounds affect performance??
GT500=3.05 sec.
Z51 Vette=3.03 sec.
ZO6=2.58 sec.
GT3=3.01 sec.
911turbo=3.05 sec.
GTi=3.25 sec.
MX5=3.29 sec.
CivicSi=3.26 sec.
Mini Coop=3.22 sec.
So, how much worse would a hundred or so odd pounds affect performance??
GT500=3.05 sec.
Z51 Vette=3.03 sec.
ZO6=2.58 sec.
GT3=3.01 sec.
911turbo=3.05 sec.
GTi=3.25 sec.
MX5=3.29 sec.
CivicSi=3.26 sec.
Mini Coop=3.22 sec.
#201
Not that a Camaro will be near 4,000lbs, but the GT500 weighs in @ 3900+ and still manages respectable Lightning Lap times, according to Car & Driver, compared to much lighter cars.
So, how much worse would a hundred or so odd pounds affect performance??
GT500=3.05 sec.
Z51 Vette=3.03 sec.
ZO6=2.58 sec.
GT3=3.01 sec.
911turbo=3.05 sec.
GTi=3.25 sec.
MX5=3.29 sec.
CivicSi=3.26 sec.
Mini Coop=3.22 sec.
So, how much worse would a hundred or so odd pounds affect performance??
GT500=3.05 sec.
Z51 Vette=3.03 sec.
ZO6=2.58 sec.
GT3=3.01 sec.
911turbo=3.05 sec.
GTi=3.25 sec.
MX5=3.29 sec.
CivicSi=3.26 sec.
Mini Coop=3.22 sec.
The way you wrote that makes it look like all of those cars are doing laps in approximately three seconds.
Also, being two seconds behind a car with 80% of your horsepower is pretty bad, especially when the course has lots of high-speed sections and only one low-speed technical turn (speaking of the GT500 vs the Z51).
#202
Seeing how I ran 9.17 ET on and 1/8th mile track in my stock TBSS compared to the 9.3's that a GT was running with exhaust, I'll stick w/GM.
If a bone stock LS2 can make an unweildy over 2 ton SUV run like the TBSS does, I can only imagine what an LS3 will do in a more performance engineered platform with a better trans.
I'm not too impressed with Ford's engineering. Their modular engines were supposed to be "better" and then the newer design was supposed to be "better" too but have been relatively lackluster IMO. At least in NA form.
If a bone stock LS2 can make an unweildy over 2 ton SUV run like the TBSS does, I can only imagine what an LS3 will do in a more performance engineered platform with a better trans.
I'm not too impressed with Ford's engineering. Their modular engines were supposed to be "better" and then the newer design was supposed to be "better" too but have been relatively lackluster IMO. At least in NA form.
Last edited by Greed4Speed; 03-30-2008 at 12:25 PM.
#205
Originally Posted by JakeRobb:
The way you wrote that makes it look like all of those cars are doing laps in approximately three seconds.
Also, being two seconds behind a car with 80% of your horsepower is pretty bad, especially when the course has lots of high-speed sections and only one low-speed technical turn (speaking of the GT500 vs the Z51).
The way you wrote that makes it look like all of those cars are doing laps in approximately three seconds.
Also, being two seconds behind a car with 80% of your horsepower is pretty bad, especially when the course has lots of high-speed sections and only one low-speed technical turn (speaking of the GT500 vs the Z51).
The Vette has a better Chassis and weight distribution as well as way better drag coefficient, oh, and lighter ofcourse.
But is the weight the major difference or the other things I listed???
I know weight plays a part, but I think sometimes it gets too big a part...
#206
It's an L76 in the G8 GTs. L67 was the Series II 3800 supercharged motor. And a 3900 lb Camaro won't handle better than my Formula I bet.
#207
Now that would be a "Lightning Lap" huh...!
The Vette has a better Chassis and weight distribution as well as way better drag coefficient, oh, and lighter ofcourse.
But is the weight the major difference or the other things I listed???
I know weight plays a part, but I think sometimes it gets too big a part...
The Vette has a better Chassis and weight distribution as well as way better drag coefficient, oh, and lighter ofcourse.
But is the weight the major difference or the other things I listed???
I know weight plays a part, but I think sometimes it gets too big a part...
It's easy to add more horsepower. Removing weight is costly and difficult.
I'd prefer a smaller, 3200 pound car with 300 horsepower to a 3700+ pound one with 500. You can make 300 into 500 easily. You can't easily shed 500 pounds.
Here's hoping that the new camaro comes in under 3700 and has an awesome suspension set-up and spot on steering feel. I'd still get it if it met those things. And once the 6th gen comes around, having been designed from the ground up to meet the new requirements, it'll likely be the smaller ~3200 pound small-displacement V-8 (or tubro 6...i'd be up for that too) that I think I'd be even more interested in.
All the same...the new camaro is going to be a great car, and I WILL be looking at getting one. It's gonna get a test drive.
#208
If the Z/28 is a supercharged 550hp car that weighs 4000lbs it will be going up against the GT500 that weighs 3920 lbs. These cars will be pretty evenly matched.
Now the iron 5.4 DOHC is a significantly heavier engine than the aluminum 4.6 SOHC, not even taking into acount the supercharger, intercooler, etc.
But the LS family are all relatively the same weight. They're all aluminum. Plus you're expecting the same HD tranny in the base V8, the TR-6060. Ford throws a lightweight 5spd behind the current GT 4.6
So you're not going to see the same 420lb drop from a SCed car to the NA V8. More like 200-250lbs.
If a SCed Camaro weighs 4000, the base V8 will be 3750+. And the LS3 Camaro will be equal(or worse) hp/weight as the 3500lb 400hp Mustang GT.
The comparison should have been a 3500lb 400hp GT vs a 3750lb 430hp Camaro. I don't know which one I would choose. I like IRS, though.
Now the iron 5.4 DOHC is a significantly heavier engine than the aluminum 4.6 SOHC, not even taking into acount the supercharger, intercooler, etc.
But the LS family are all relatively the same weight. They're all aluminum. Plus you're expecting the same HD tranny in the base V8, the TR-6060. Ford throws a lightweight 5spd behind the current GT 4.6
So you're not going to see the same 420lb drop from a SCed car to the NA V8. More like 200-250lbs.
If a SCed Camaro weighs 4000, the base V8 will be 3750+. And the LS3 Camaro will be equal(or worse) hp/weight as the 3500lb 400hp Mustang GT.
The comparison should have been a 3500lb 400hp GT vs a 3750lb 430hp Camaro. I don't know which one I would choose. I like IRS, though.
Last edited by BigBlueCruiser; 03-31-2008 at 01:56 PM.
#209
Just some things for your consideration:
-The Camaro won't be that much smaller than a G8.
-What would the G8 weigh with 20" wheels?
- What would the G8 weigh with a supercharged/intercooled engine and drivetrain and peripherals to support it?
-What would a G8 convertible weigh?
-The Camaro won't be that much smaller than a G8.
-What would the G8 weigh with 20" wheels?
- What would the G8 weigh with a supercharged/intercooled engine and drivetrain and peripherals to support it?
-What would a G8 convertible weigh?
Oh, I see you're actually thinking an NA LS3 Camaro could weigh 4000lbs because the L76 G8 weighs about 4000lbs.
Eeewww.. that would be bad.
I'd take the Ford, hands down.
#210
...Now the iron 5.4 DOHC is a significantly heavier engine than the aluminum 4.6 SOHC, not even taking into acount the supercharger, intercooler, etc.
But the LS family are all relatively the same weight. They're all aluminum. Plus you're expecting the same HD tranny in the base V8, the TR-6060. Ford throws a lightweight 5spd behind the current GT 4.6
So you're not going to see the same 420lb drop from a SCed car to the NA V8. More like 200-250lbs...
But the LS family are all relatively the same weight. They're all aluminum. Plus you're expecting the same HD tranny in the base V8, the TR-6060. Ford throws a lightweight 5spd behind the current GT 4.6
So you're not going to see the same 420lb drop from a SCed car to the NA V8. More like 200-250lbs...