2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos
View Poll Results: All things being equal, which would you buy in 2011
4,000 lbs Camaro
108
65.45%
3,500 lbs Mustang
23
13.94%
I'd buy something else.
34
20.61%
Voters: 165. You may not vote on this poll

Here's a weight poll for you guys.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2008 | 09:50 AM
  #106  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
To answer the poll, I'd buy a 4,000 lb. Camaro, and do some weight reduction.
Old 03-17-2008 | 09:55 AM
  #107  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by skorpion317
To answer the poll, I'd buy a 4,000 lb. Camaro, and do some weight reduction.

Oh man, if it were only that easy.....

I'll tell you guys, a quarter ton difference is so huge, so insurmountable, I just couldn't imagine the heavier car being more satisfying to drive.

Last edited by Z284ever; 03-17-2008 at 09:59 AM.
Old 03-17-2008 | 10:07 AM
  #108  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Oh man, if it were only that easy.....

I'll tell you guys, a quarter ton difference is so huge, so insurmountable, I just couldn't imagine the heavier car being more satisfying to drive.
It shouldn't be too hard. Remove the rear seats and associated hardware, replace the hood and trunk with fiberglass or carbon fiber, lighter aftermarket wheels, etc. It might not be a quarter ton, but you could remove a couple hundred pounds if you wanted. 3800 lbs. is better than 4000.
Old 03-17-2008 | 10:12 AM
  #109  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Oh man, if it were only that easy.....

I'll tell you guys, a quarter ton difference is so huge, so insurmountable, I just couldn't imagine the heavier car being more satisfying to drive.
Whoa, hold on a second. Weren't you saying a while back, how much you admire the CTS-V interior? Maybe that's the car for you....

But see, that's the problem with this poll. We don't yet know what all is in your theoretical 4000 lb Camaro. People could make a lot more informed decision if they knew all the equipment and features that will be in the new Camaro... which we do not yet know. So this lack of facts really distorts the accuracy and validity of the survey.

As for weight reduction. There are a lot of ways to impact that. Remove back seats... spare tires... change out the hood for 'glas... etc.
Old 03-17-2008 | 10:13 AM
  #110  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by skorpion317
It shouldn't be too hard. Remove the rear seats and associated hardware, replace the hood and trunk with fiberglass or carbon fiber, lighter aftermarket wheels, etc. It might not be a quarter ton, but you could remove a couple hundred pounds if you wanted. 3800 lbs. is better than 4000.
Hah you beat me to it! Great minds think alike
Old 03-17-2008 | 10:14 AM
  #111  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
You know, my personal preference on the Z/28 would be to just use a hotly tuned, NA version of the Gen V smallblock, and take all that cost and effort saved from a SC's engine - and put it ALL towards weight reduction for that particular model.

Just me though....
Old 03-17-2008 | 11:16 AM
  #112  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by Z284ever
You know, my personal preference on the Z/28 would be to just use a hotly tuned, NA version of the Gen V smallblock, and take all that cost and effort saved from a SC's engine - and put it ALL towards weight reduction for that particular model.

Just me though....
I wholeheartedly agree.

But if the Camaro came out weighing 4000 lbs., I'd still buy it, just because it's a Camaro.
Old 03-17-2008 | 01:03 PM
  #113  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by skorpion317
I wholeheartedly agree.

But if the Camaro came out weighing 4000 lbs., I'd still buy it, just because it's a Camaro.
Would a 2 ton Camaro really still be a Camaro - or would it have strayed too far?
Old 03-17-2008 | 01:05 PM
  #114  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Would a 2 ton Camaro really still be a Camaro - or would it have strayed too far?
If it has the badge and the styling, and if Chevy tells us it's a Camaro, then it's a Camaro.....
Old 03-17-2008 | 01:13 PM
  #115  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Would a 2 ton Camaro really still be a Camaro - or would it have strayed too far?
It would still be a Camaro. What would it be to you?
Old 03-17-2008 | 01:23 PM
  #116  
diarmadhi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 208
From: Phoenix AZ
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Would a 2 ton Camaro really still be a Camaro - or would it have strayed too far?
To me the average consumer, Yes becuase we could care less about the history of "what" a camaro is. The only thing that matters right now is THIS is the 2010 camaro. The Style, Small block V8, and Price are what is going to sell it not what was done the last 4 generations of a "name". No regular consumer is going to compare this to any other camaro, its going to get compared to the mustang and challenger because thats what you can buy new at this time.
Old 03-17-2008 | 01:24 PM
  #117  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Would a 2 ton Camaro really still be a Camaro - or would it have strayed too far?
It's at the upper end of the scale (pun intended), but yes, it would still be a Camaro.
Old 03-17-2008 | 04:34 PM
  #118  
91Z28350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,011
Would it still be a Camaro? Yes. Would it be a Camaro I would buy? No, most likely not. For that weight, I might as well have the larger Challenger.
Old 03-17-2008 | 04:39 PM
  #119  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by 91Z28350
For that weight, I might as well have the larger Challenger.
I'm thinking along the same lines with the G8. For right around 4000#s, you get a relatively roomy sedan with great performance. Would it be up to snuff performance-wise with a supercharged V8 Camaro of the same heft? No, but at that point I might as well carry 5 people while I go fast....
Old 03-17-2008 | 04:44 PM
  #120  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
If it has the badge and the styling, and if Chevy tells us it's a Camaro, then it's a Camaro.....
I've been wanting to say that, but didn't cause I figured I'd get an internet slap from the man.

Thank you. You hit the nail right on the head....especially with the "if Chevy tells us" part.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 AM.