2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Here's the Z28 news

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2008 | 07:04 PM
  #31  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Scott has never let us down before... yet... Cheryl is in charge of the Camaro program. Confusing indeed.
Old 07-21-2008 | 07:05 PM
  #32  
stars1010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,122
From: Houston
SO what they are saying is the Z28 is on hiatus?

Hmmmmm I heard that word somewhere before.....












Come on guys they will build it!
Old 07-21-2008 | 07:09 PM
  #33  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by stars1010
Come on guys they will build it!
I don't doubt that. The thing is with the convertible due out Summer of 2010, instead of the previously stated December 2009, what date does that mean for Z/28? MY2012? I'm not sure I'm willing to wait another 3-years+.
Old 07-21-2008 | 07:10 PM
  #34  
ChrisL's Avatar
Thread Starter
2010 Camaro Moderator/Disciple
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,087
From: Chester, NY
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
1st Question. What was the talk about the rear bumper and why it was changed from the very smooth and clean design of the concpet? Why add the extra cut lines in when they really didn't need to be added. Why place the reverse lights there and not someplace else that doesn't chop a hole in the rear fascia? Any comments from GM on this?

2nd Question. Curb weight. I know you said they have dropped a few pounds from May but it's still high. What reasons did they give as to why this car is the heaviest Camaro ever? The car is full of airbags and I know those are heavy but did they discuss this topic?
1st - Tom Peters said it was one of the hardest things they had to wrestle with. Dont forget, bumpers, reverse lights have specific requirements to meet FMVSS. That's the challenger between the design and engineering teams.

2nd - Zeta is heavy. Airbags are heavy. They did what they could to remove as much weight as possible from the architecture they had to work with. Physics is physics.
Old 07-21-2008 | 07:11 PM
  #35  
DragonSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2
From: Brandon.MS
If Chevy doesn't make a Camaro to compete with the GT500's I will NOT buy a Camaro. I currently own a new Z06 and two Shelby GT500s (purchased only because there was no Camaro), but I have owned 5 Camaros and would really like to own another, but not if I will to lose to every Snake I see.

Rich
Old 07-21-2008 | 07:13 PM
  #36  
Chuck!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,612
From: Cincinnati, OH
I guess there's the possibility that some of the 20% reduction in white collar jobs were related to the Z
Old 07-21-2008 | 07:20 PM
  #37  
95zsean's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 919
From: New Brunswick,Canada
If they build them, we will buy them!

It should be: Stripped down, light weight with a LS7. I can only DREAM!!!

BUILD THE Z28 PLEASE!!!!!!!!!
Old 07-21-2008 | 07:21 PM
  #38  
Aaron91RS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 162
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by ChrisL
1st - Tom Peters said it was one of the hardest things they had to wrestle with. Dont forget, bumpers, reverse lights have specific requirements to meet FMVSS. That's the challenger between the design and engineering teams.
sure it wasn't more retro to make it look like the 69RS that also moved the reverse lights down there (didn't look better then either)
Why not put them in the black part, or on either side of the plate, or up were we wanted them? All 3 of those options can't be outlawed?
Old 07-21-2008 | 07:31 PM
  #39  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by ChrisL
1st - Tom Peters said it was one of the hardest things they had to wrestle with. Dont forget, bumpers, reverse lights have specific requirements to meet FMVSS. That's the challenger between the design and engineering teams.
I'm aware of FMVSS but I just don't get why they could have placed the reverse lights in the lower plastic valance of the C6 and not the Camaro. Tom Peters was on both.

Question 3 is more to do with the interior and the Ignition Video seen today.
http://www.chevrolet.com/camaro/multimedia/

Will the Camaro have a HUD option? And can you shed any light on the red LED lit interior accent. Will that be offered?
Old 07-21-2008 | 07:38 PM
  #40  
8Banger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 362
Seriously guys, of course the Z28 is NOT dead. Think about it. Do you really think they would bring back the Camaro and not have one badged as a Z? Things will settle down
for GM and it will eventually hit the streets. I'll bet my new SS on it.
Old 07-21-2008 | 07:45 PM
  #41  
GTOJack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 976
From: SE MI
Looks likes the suits at GM didnt want a SC Z28 Camaro to encroach on ZO6 and ZR1 sales. When you look at the big picture, a $50,000 500hp Camaro would hurt $75,000 ZO6 sales. A lot of us on here love the Camaro, but the Corvette is Chevy's halo car and the Camaro is the bang for the buck volume car for Chevrolet and GM.
Old 07-21-2008 | 07:49 PM
  #42  
ChrisL's Avatar
Thread Starter
2010 Camaro Moderator/Disciple
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,087
From: Chester, NY
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
I'm aware of FMVSS but I just don't get why they could have placed the reverse lights in the lower plastic valance of the C6 and not the Camaro. Tom Peters was on both.

Question 3 is more to do with the interior and the Ignition Video seen today.
http://www.chevrolet.com/camaro/multimedia/

Will the Camaro have a HUD option? And can you shed any light on the red LED lit interior accent. Will that be offered?
didnt get into the specifics of where else was considered, but I do recall clear as day his saying that was a tough one for them.

cant talk about HUD since its not in any of literature I've seen so far.

LED accent lighting will be optional content.
Old 07-21-2008 | 07:50 PM
  #43  
Aaron91RS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 162
From: St. Louis, MO
probably not.
While a lot of us would love to move up from a NA camaro to a SC camaro.
No vette guy is going to want to move down.
Old 07-21-2008 | 07:58 PM
  #44  
ChrisL's Avatar
Thread Starter
2010 Camaro Moderator/Disciple
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,087
From: Chester, NY
Originally Posted by Aaron91RS
No vette guy is going to want to move down.
Camaro success is will not be determined by vette guys moving down. thats for sure.
Old 07-21-2008 | 08:01 PM
  #45  
91Zman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 403
From: Wish I knew..
Z28...WANTS ANOTHER IN THE SIG!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 AM.