2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Hot Rod Magazine Article

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2007 | 10:01 PM
  #31  
Casull's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 336
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by Pentatonic
Base model V8's with over 400 hp, and a supercharged "high content" Z28 model with 550 hp?

That would be sweet if it turns out to be true!
If the base V8 with over 400 hp is the LS3 and then supercharged 550HP version is a s/c LS3, then why would it "only" have 550HP? Isn't the s/c 6.2 vette supposed to have 650 hp? What would they do to it to reduce the HP by 100?
Old 03-15-2007 | 10:16 PM
  #32  
3whiterag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 74
Originally Posted by Casull
Yes it is... I wasn't even aware this thread existed....
What are you doing here?
Old 03-15-2007 | 10:19 PM
  #33  
Casull's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 336
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by 3whiterag
What are you doing here?
lol... I was thinking the same thing...

I have been around here since about October. I ama forum junkie and i can't seem to get enough info/speculation about the Camaro.
Old 03-16-2007 | 11:42 AM
  #34  
95firehawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 694
From: Brighton, IL
Originally Posted by Casull
If the base V8 with over 400 hp is the LS3 and then supercharged 550HP version is a s/c LS3, then why would it "only" have 550HP? Isn't the s/c 6.2 vette supposed to have 650 hp? What would they do to it to reduce the HP by 100?
Bigger pulley (lower boost) and a less aggressive tune for starters.

Rumors floating around here a while back included the following;

1) N/A 6.2
2) S/C 6.2 non intercooled low boost
3) S/C 6.2 intercooled low boost
4) S/C 6.2 intercooled high boost

These engines weren't all slated for the Camaro but I could see at least the first two making it. Maybe our Gm powertrain insider could give us a little "winkie" on the truth of any of this? Sorry, but I'm just a little bit skeptical.
Old 03-16-2007 | 11:45 AM
  #35  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by 95firehawk
Bigger pulley (lower boost) and a less aggressive tune for starters.

Rumors floating around here a while back included the following;

1) N/A 6.2
2) S/C 6.2 non intercooled low boost
3) S/C 6.2 intercooled low boost
4) S/C 6.2 intercooled high boost

These engines weren't all slated for the Camaro but I could see at least the first two making it. Maybe our Gm powertrain insider could give us a little "winkie" on the truth of any of this? Sorry, but I'm just a little bit skeptical.
That makes complete sense. I was thinking the same thing on the bigger pully and boost. So swap #1 would be swap in the vette pully and re-tune it.
Old 03-16-2007 | 11:46 AM
  #36  
95firehawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 694
From: Brighton, IL
Exactly!
Old 04-02-2007 | 01:55 PM
  #37  
hooper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 22
From: Home of the New Camaro
Originally Posted by 3whiterag
What are you doing here?
Hey, T. I just picked up that magazine yesterday. Interesting article indeed. One thing is for sure, if you guys send us a nice, powerful engine we'll make sure and slip it carefully into a shiny Camaro.
Old 04-19-2007 | 09:18 AM
  #38  
Pentatonic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 806
From: MI
So what's the latest status of this, 3whiterag? Is the article still something that should be making us think? Or has something changed in the ever-shifting climate at GM?
Old 04-21-2007 | 12:50 PM
  #39  
61695's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 139
The article refered to a " high content" model that will get blown. That means loaded with over priced electronic foo-foo. Think i'll wait til procharger gets a kit ready if that happens.
Old 04-21-2007 | 02:46 PM
  #40  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by 61695
The article refered to a " high content" model that will get blown. That means loaded with over priced electronic foo-foo.
What evidence do you have to support that assertation? Why couldn't the high performance Camaro get the Z06 treatment?
Old 05-05-2007 | 05:03 PM
  #41  
foxbat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 545
From: Tampa
dunno...that nearly 3800 pound curb weight makes me nervous...
Old 05-05-2007 | 05:23 PM
  #42  
SS 396's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by foxbat
dunno...that nearly 3800 pound curb weight makes me nervous...

Let's hope Jenny Craig can work her magic and trim a couple hundred pounds off that scary number.
Old 05-05-2007 | 05:31 PM
  #43  
foxbat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 545
From: Tampa
i hope so....the 4th gen was already hefty at 3400-3500, now, with a new design i was hoping it would come in close or a bit lower than 3500.
Old 05-05-2007 | 07:51 PM
  #44  
ChrisL's Avatar
2010 Camaro Moderator/Disciple
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,087
From: Chester, NY
Fbodfather already discredited the reports of the weight in that article. Fact is GM doesn't know yet exactly what it will weigh.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Injuneer
LT1 Based Engine Tech
0
05-15-2015 09:45 AM
Caps94ZODG
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
10
09-09-2002 01:08 AM
Caps94ZODG
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
22
07-30-2002 09:45 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 AM.