Hot Rod Magazine Article
#31
If the base V8 with over 400 hp is the LS3 and then supercharged 550HP version is a s/c LS3, then why would it "only" have 550HP? Isn't the s/c 6.2 vette supposed to have 650 hp? What would they do to it to reduce the HP by 100?
#33
#34
Rumors floating around here a while back included the following;
1) N/A 6.2
2) S/C 6.2 non intercooled low boost
3) S/C 6.2 intercooled low boost
4) S/C 6.2 intercooled high boost
These engines weren't all slated for the Camaro but I could see at least the first two making it. Maybe our Gm powertrain insider could give us a little "winkie" on the truth of any of this? Sorry, but I'm just a little bit skeptical.
#35
Bigger pulley (lower boost) and a less aggressive tune for starters.
Rumors floating around here a while back included the following;
1) N/A 6.2
2) S/C 6.2 non intercooled low boost
3) S/C 6.2 intercooled low boost
4) S/C 6.2 intercooled high boost
These engines weren't all slated for the Camaro but I could see at least the first two making it. Maybe our Gm powertrain insider could give us a little "winkie" on the truth of any of this? Sorry, but I'm just a little bit skeptical.
Rumors floating around here a while back included the following;
1) N/A 6.2
2) S/C 6.2 non intercooled low boost
3) S/C 6.2 intercooled low boost
4) S/C 6.2 intercooled high boost
These engines weren't all slated for the Camaro but I could see at least the first two making it. Maybe our Gm powertrain insider could give us a little "winkie" on the truth of any of this? Sorry, but I'm just a little bit skeptical.
#37
#40
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Caps94ZODG
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
10
09-09-2002 01:08 AM
Caps94ZODG
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
22
07-30-2002 09:45 AM