2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

just a simple ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2007, 06:58 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Evil Lord Lucas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NorCal
Posts: 107
just a simple ???

The new design has grown on me enough that I now want a 5th gen Camaro. My only question is: Is it going to incorporate "drive by wire"; or will be a good old physical connection? Meaning will the steering column actually be be connected to the power steering box and so forth; gas pedal connected to the throttle body, etc...
Evil Lord Lucas is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 08:10 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,308
That's a really good question/point!! I'd be willing to bet it'll have drive-by-wire, but "probably" (going on the fact that the Camaro is supposed to be a "budget" oriented car) traditional rack & pinion steering .

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but don't the GTO's use drive-by-wire?? I know that the 'Vettes do, and have for a long time already. I think that's probably the way it'll be leaning .
Capn Pete is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 08:22 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Evil Lord Lucas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NorCal
Posts: 107
If they do use "drive by wire" I won't be getting one. I don't like a computing telling my wheels when to turn, or when I step on the brake. I don't care how proven the tech may be; I just don't trust it.
Evil Lord Lucas is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 08:30 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
2000GTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 12,312
Its proven to be a pretty reliable system, but its just unusual to me. I've always been used to a cable driven throttle. I get nervous as well with my throttle management being at the hands of a wiring harness and PCM.
2000GTP is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 09:28 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
MissedShift's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 858
The throttle'll be drive by wire. Everything else will likely be traditional.
MissedShift is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 09:33 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: TX Med Ctr
Posts: 4,000
My 2000 V6 has drive by wire and there have been no problems with it whatsoever. The 01 feels maybe slightly more responsive but that is bound to have more to do with the extra 1.9L displacement it has, not the cable.
HAZ-Matt is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 09:48 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,308
Originally Posted by Evil Lord Lucas
If they do use "drive by wire" I won't be getting one. I don't like a computing telling my wheels when to turn, or when I step on the brake. I don't care how proven the tech may be; I just don't trust it.
You or I may not "like it", but you can't deny the performance of such cars as both the C5 and C6 Z06's which both use drive-by-wire, and are quite successful around race tracks and even on drag strips!!

If you choose not to buy a 5th-gen Camaro because of drive-by-wire, then obviously that's your "choice" , but it's a small "sacrifice" I'd be willing to make to get my hands on the best Camaro ever .
Capn Pete is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 10:50 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Evil Lord Lucas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NorCal
Posts: 107
I won't the performance point; it's just not a tech I'm ready to embrace yet. Maybe by the time the 50th ann. Z28 rolls out I might feel different.
Evil Lord Lucas is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 11:31 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,308
I'm sure there were a lot of people who felt the same way about EFI vs. carburetors at first too??
Capn Pete is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 11:44 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
90rocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Posts: 2,947
If I can't tell an appreciable difference, then who cares??
But if it's responds sluggish, or as it sees fit, I'll HAVE to change it!
My car needs to trust me as much as I need to count on it...
90rocz is offline  
Old 01-09-2007, 12:14 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
Originally Posted by Capn Pete
I'm sure there were a lot of people who felt the same way about EFI vs. carburetors at first too??
That's an excellent comparision. You're 100% correct. Back in the day (before Al Gore invented the internet ), in many of the top magazines, readers chimed in on how there was no way they were buying a new Camaro if it had that fancy new fangled EFI over their beloved 4bbl carburetor.

I'm sorry but as an engineer I am very skeptical when people are hesitant about embracing new technology. While I feel its ok to question new things, however to completely throw something out because you fear it, or you don't understand it reminds me of folks like the unibomber.
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 01-09-2007, 04:21 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
guionM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Golden State
Posts: 13,711
Mustang uses drive by wire, and early in the 2005's production run people were becoming alarmed when the GTs couldn't do burnouts. Turns out the computer prevented it before the engine was broken in via the drive-by-wire system.

I personally don't like the system, as it takes a simple task and creates a new, more expensive way of doing it. I'm sure wires and the system are no lighter or reliable than a cable, so the reason for the system has got to be sending more control of the car through the PCM.
guionM is offline  
Old 01-09-2007, 04:46 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,308
Originally Posted by guionM
I'm sure wires and the system are no lighter or reliable than a cable, so the reason for the system has got to be sending more control of the car through the PCM.
No kidding!!!

The "advantage" I can see is that cruise control and traction control can both be operated (as well as normal throttle) by 1 input (cable) ... instead of A) a throttle cable and B) a cruise cable, OR A) a throttle cable and B) a TC / CC cable, with a huge box mounted on the fender and cables running back and forth between it and the TB . And when TC activates, you won't feel the pedal push back up on your foot!

But the "disadvantages" are like you acknowledged. The computer is now in full control, not "you" the driver. TORQUE MANAGEMENT ... that is becoming the "curse" of newer, high HP cars ... it makes ~400 HP cars run 13's, and ~500 HP cars run 12's! The drive-by-wire just makes it so much easier for the computer to step in and take control.

I just hope that the aftermarket tuners/programmers can get the computers figured out and find ways to completely eliminate all the "programming interference"??
Capn Pete is offline  
Old 01-10-2007, 08:05 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
2K1SunsetSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clinton TWP, MI
Posts: 650
Originally Posted by Capn Pete
No kidding!!!

The "advantage" I can see is that cruise control and traction control can both be operated (as well as normal throttle) by 1 input (cable) ... instead of A) a throttle cable and B) a cruise cable, OR A) a throttle cable and B) a TC / CC cable, with a huge box mounted on the fender and cables running back and forth between it and the TB . And when TC activates, you won't feel the pedal push back up on your foot!

But the "disadvantages" are like you acknowledged. The computer is now in full control, not "you" the driver. TORQUE MANAGEMENT ... that is becoming the "curse" of newer, high HP cars ... it makes ~400 HP cars run 13's, and ~500 HP cars run 12's! The drive-by-wire just makes it so much easier for the computer to step in and take control.

I just hope that the aftermarket tuners/programmers can get the computers figured out and find ways to completely eliminate all the "programming interference"??

It has been figured out with the GTO/vette so I would guess it will be an easy 'fix' with the Camaro as well.
2K1SunsetSS is offline  
Old 01-10-2007, 08:14 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
JG/70Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 323
My old corsica didn't seem to safe or reliable when the throttle cable got stuck.

You're just a scared old man
JG/70Z is offline  


Quick Reply: just a simple ???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 PM.