2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Justifiable Purchase

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2008 | 06:00 PM
  #31  
MatthewRox's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 181
Unhappy High Hopes

When I purchased my Pontiac G8, customers where all over the showroom vehicle........ this was before gas was over $3.50 a couple months ago. I was hoping the G8 will not fade away into the oblivion, but I think it will. Pontiac had high hope for this vehicle.

The G8 entail everything that anyone wants at $30K...............but not the pump price hahahah

[QUOTE=kansascitdrkman;5450540]There are a lot less enthusiast than are average car buyers. The economy is what it is.... And that is exactly the point why would someone buy a 25 to 35 thousand dollar car that in reality is a situational car with gas being almost the equivalent of half the car payment. I am not talking about enthusiast I am talking about average joe, to whom the life of the camaro is directly tied to. I hate beating a dead dog QUOTE]
Old 06-27-2008 | 06:24 PM
  #32  
Dragoneye's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 801
From: New York
Originally Posted by MatthewRox
Not sure if you know..... but the G8 is the V8 L76 with 364 Horses.

Best I can do with that vehicle is HIGHWAY 70 mph @ 24 miles per gallon..... you take the vehicle up to 80, you only get 18. And we are speaking cylinder deactivation here? hahahah Thumbs up my TA get better mileage.... could it be the weight factor of the G8. Honestly, the 0 to 60 is a thrill.... I can't imagine that thrill you would get in the new Camaro with this type of Horses stock.................................

My wife drives this vehicle the majority of the time.... and she does pratically only city throughout the week. No highway needed. I don't feel the engine burns very efficiently.

Yah we can pay at the pump, but if we had the choice, would we want to? That's the question.
Believe me, I know. I was one of the guys who thought the Camaro was definitely going to get an L76. (It's 361 horses, IIRC)

But here's one more question for you before I draw my own conclusions......
Does your wife drive through lots of hilly areas with the car?

Because so far we've got:
Big Sedan, with a Big V8, being driving around the city the majority of the time (which means AFM is virtually non-existant)....all that's needed is hilly areas, and I think the issue becomes quite obvious.
Old 06-27-2008 | 06:30 PM
  #33  
GSS9909's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 59
From: colorado
Mty point it that we are in a state of panic over the gas prices that should not be there its not that much higher than a year ago and the savings on a " fuel efficent car" are not that much.
also I never said that beer drinks ect are needs, its stuff people regardless ( stateing an exaple of things we spend tons of money on with out thinking twice about)and having any kind of car is not a need its a want. No body and I mean nobody needs to have a car. We buy them becouse we want them. the only things in life that are a nessecity are food water air the only thing one need to live ( and a camaro) everything else are for pleasure and people will make room in thrte budgets to have what they want. And if this car lives to all the buzz it will do just fine. you will still be paying have your payment or more than your payment in gas in a cobalt or aveo or any other small car.14 gallon tank $4 gas fill 3 times a month =$168 $12000( base model anything)car no negative equity 60 months + appx $300 a month
example: dodge store up the street from me sold two challangers last saturday for 20,000 over sticker.

Last edited by GSS9909; 06-27-2008 at 06:35 PM.
Old 06-27-2008 | 07:22 PM
  #34  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,576
From: Arlington, Texas
Originally Posted by MatthewRox
70 MPH at 24 MPG
80 MPG and you will get only 18

I expected at least 28 to 30.
Same here w/ our Impala. Was supposed to get 18/27 I think it was, we actually get 13/23-24. On the other hand, the vette was supposed to get 16/26, and it gets 19/31. Go figure.
Old 06-28-2008 | 09:19 AM
  #35  
kissel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 186
From: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Originally Posted by MatthewRox
California.
California...............the land of fruits and nuts.
Old 06-28-2008 | 11:18 AM
  #36  
ForYourMalice's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 204
From: Filthydelphia, PA
Originally Posted by vonmoldy
The good thing about high gas prices is the people who whine about it and aren't really into cars or driving anyways will buy the 4cyl or hybrid or just any old car that gets good MPG. Demand for gas will hopefully go down and gas prices will lower and there will be lots more cheap gas for me and my V8.
What planet are you living on?
Old 06-28-2008 | 12:44 PM
  #37  
falchulk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,881
Originally Posted by MatthewRox
Correct enough... I know you guys are Die Hard Camaro potential..... nothing can sway you... and pointing certain things out for discussion is good.........

I got Rid of one of my TA to purchase the G8 for my wife since I didn't want to correct the leak in steering pinion. I was looking to trade that TA in for the new Camaro when it comes out. I couldn't wait any longer for the vehicle began to have very rough idle at time etc............. so instead of buying the wife a Mercedes, I took the sacrifice to get the G8 when it came out.

Honestly, I read this thread through a couple of times. You are all over the place. A camaro plug as is cheaper then a mercedes + gas? If you were looking to buy a Mercedes, then why the hell did you "sacrifice" your TA? The G8 is MUCH cheaper and would not have required a trade in to het MUCH lower payments. Your basic thought track makes sense but you other statements make no sense. You have a V8 Expedition??? I owned one and they dont get over 13mpg combined milage. WTF would you not trade that?
Old 06-28-2008 | 01:10 PM
  #38  
POWERFREAK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 369
From: Mahopac, NY
Originally Posted by falchulk
Honestly, I read this thread through a couple of times. You are all over the place. A camaro plug as is cheaper then a mercedes + gas? If you were looking to buy a Mercedes, then why the hell did you "sacrifice" your TA? The G8 is MUCH cheaper and would not have required a trade in to het MUCH lower payments. Your basic thought track makes sense but you other statements make no sense. You have a V8 Expedition??? I owned one and they dont get over 13mpg combined milage. WTF would you not trade that?
yup...not to mention there's been at least 10 of these almost identical threads since gas prices have jumped up.
Old 06-28-2008 | 03:27 PM
  #39  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,711
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by MatthewRox
Despite today's manufacturing and technology, I'm still amazed that my G8 is not giving off super good MPG compared to my 2001 Trans Am.
"Super good MPG"???!

Consider this....

Your 2002 Pontiac Trans Am was rated at 17 mpg city, and 25 mpg highway (manual) and 16 city 23 highway with the automatic.

The Pontiac G8 GT (automatic only) is rated at 15 & 24 MPG by the new measurements... By the old EPA measurements, the G8 gets 17 and 27 MPG respectively.

That's 2 MPG better on the highway than the manual, and a whopping 4 MPG improvement over a 2002 Firebird Trans Am with an automatic.

On top of that, the G8 GT has nearly a 20 horsepower and over 40 lbs/ft of torque advantage over the LS1


If that isn't overkill enough, consider that your 2001 Trans Am is basically a clapbox next to your 2008 Pontiac G8. The G8 has improved quality, IRS, light years ahead in better materials and construction, and being a 4 door, full size sports sedan, not a relatively lightweight 4 passenger sports coupe, is also about 450 pounds heavier to boot.



A better measurement would be MPG per horsepower. But even against the LS1, the G8 GT ends up alot better. More power. Better mileage... despite alot more weight.

Originally Posted by kissel
California...............the land of fruits and nuts.
Actually, that's Florida.

Last edited by guionM; 06-28-2008 at 03:31 PM.
Old 06-28-2008 | 03:33 PM
  #40  
DOOM Master's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 615
From: Pekin, IL, United States
Originally Posted by M85Iroc-Z
For some people, its a collector's item or toy weekend car.
Exactly. I already own a car that gets good gas mileage (2007 Ford Focus Wagon, it's my work car, I drive over 4000 miles a month on it). If I need to go on a long trip, I'll use it. Not my current 94 Camaro. Not my 2010 Camaro that I will be buying (I also won't be getting rid of my current Camaro either). They will be my weekend drivers, and they will sit in the garage if it's raining or winter.

Oh, and I also own a 97 S10 pickup and just bought today a 95 Tahoe 1500 4x4 (it's a new project car, don't know what I'm going to do with it yet). So next year, I'll own 5 different cars. I'm 1 guy, live by myself, have no wife or kids. I make good money and I like cars. Even at $7 a gallon, I'll still drive my Camaros on the weekend.

Not everyone is worried about gas prices. Sure, most people have been effected by them. But for those of us looking to buy the Camaro as a weekend toy, we aren't worried about it. And I know I'm not the only one who's going to do this.

I think the majority of the problem is that so many people today seem to think they should be able to tell others what they should and should not be able to have and do. No one needs a 500 horsepower car, so why should they be allowed to sell them? Well, just because I don't need it, doesn't mean I don't want it! And just because you don't like it doesn't give you the right to tell me what I can and cannot have.

As for gas going to $7 a gallon, I seriously doubt it. This is the same doom-and-gloom scaremongering that happened back in the 70s and early 80s. Oil was suppose to just keep climbing in price until the world turned into Mad Max. Well, it didn't happen then and I don't think it's going to happen now. After the early 80s, we ended up with gas at about $1 for the next 20 years. So I'll just sit back and wait on what's going to happen in the next 5 years.
Old 06-28-2008 | 03:45 PM
  #41  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,711
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by MatthewRox
At $4.50 already and the price per barrow is still going up. Gas has doubled in price within the past 3 years. When I purchased the G8, there was a waiting list for the Challenger at Dodge with a 15% markup in price. Checking yesterday, I see there are no more markup for they are not selling as expected here in California.

Matthew
Not sure where you get your information Matt, or if you actually check on this stuff. For the record, there hasn't been a single Challenger sold in California outside of the 2008, sold-out SRT8. Chrysler only recently started accepting orders on the regular 2009 Challengers (ie: the V6 and the R/T), and early indications are that orders are coming in at a very good clip.

Yes, this is California.



Originally Posted by 90 Z28SS
damn straight .

For neone currently driving a older Camaro , Mustang or truck on a daily basis ....the new Camaro will be saving them in gas . Like wise with the V6 Camaro's . I still see a *** ton of daily driven F-bodies .
Mine is one of them.


Originally Posted by MatthewRox
Correct enough... I know you guys are Die Hard Camaro potential..... nothing can sway you... and pointing certain things out for discussion is good.........

I got Rid of one of my TA to purchase the G8 for my wife since I didn't want to correct the leak in steering pinion. I was looking to trade that TA in for the new Camaro when it comes out. I couldn't wait any longer for the vehicle began to have very rough idle at time etc............. so instead of buying the wife a Mercedes, I took the sacrifice to get the G8 when it came out.
Not sure if I follow here.

Did you sell the car due to a steering pinion leak or the rough idle?
If you could afford a Mercedes, why the hysteria over fuel prices?

Originally Posted by MatthewRox
Best I can do with that vehicle is HIGHWAY 70 mph @ 24 miles per gallon..... you take the vehicle up to 80, you only get 18. And we are speaking cylinder deactivation here? hahahah Thumbs up my TA get better mileage.... could it be the weight factor of the G8. Honestly, the 0 to 60 is a thrill.... I can't imagine that thrill you would get in the new Camaro with this type of Horses stock..................................
Let me take a stab at something here..... I'm betting your T/A was a 6 speed manual. Because that's where the issue is. The automatics aren't that great with fuel economy in day to day driving although they can be programmed to cheat EPA tests. With the 6 speed manual, you could get some pretty amazing mileage (better than EPA numbers) in regular day-to-day driving. I did with my '97 Z28.
Old 06-28-2008 | 03:57 PM
  #42  
HuJass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,224
From: CNY
I can't believe you're going 3-4 weeks on a tank of gas in a Saturn.
What do you drive, 1 mile a day?

They don't get THAT good of mileage.


And the window sticker on the G8 TOLD you it got 24 MPG on the highway. Why on Earth would you think it would get 28-30 MPG?
Old 06-28-2008 | 05:34 PM
  #43  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
The Solstice picture is interesting considering that the 4 cylinder Solstice doesn't really have any fuel economy advantage over the 8 cylinder Corvette.

Originally Posted by guionM
"Super good MPG"???!

Consider this....

Your 2002 Pontiac Trans Am was rated at 17 mpg city, and 25 mpg highway (manual) and 16 city 23 highway with the automatic.

The Pontiac G8 GT (automatic only) is rated at 15 & 24 MPG by the new measurements... By the old EPA measurements, the G8 gets 17 and 27 MPG respectively.

That's 2 MPG better on the highway than the manual, and a whopping 4 MPG improvement over a 2002 Firebird Trans Am with an automatic.
I can't speak for the actual numbers in the G8, but my 2001 Formula automatic peaks at about 25mpg @ 55-65mph, but then falls off to about 22mpg at 80mpg as far as I remember. This is via measurement with HPTuners based on RPM, mph, and injector pulses. If his instant economy measured by the computer in his G8 says it is only getting 18mpg @ 80mph in the G8, it is in fact less than the Fbody autos on the road there. That is unless some difference between Texas and California gasoline causes the penalty. But even so, I don't think it is completely fair to the G8 to expect much better fuel economy than an Fbody, even if it is newer since it is a big sedan. However, I would expect it to perform somewhere near the EPA ratings, and certainly not below 20mpg on the road. Sounds like it needs the rear axle ratio corrected.

Just to clarify, those EPA ratings for the 2002's are the new measurement, not the window sticker ratings.

Last edited by HAZ-Matt; 06-28-2008 at 05:36 PM.
Old 06-28-2008 | 05:56 PM
  #44  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
Originally Posted by JasonD
Where are people getting these $7.00 a gallon numbers from? Is this just speculation out of thin air?
I been paying $7.50 all this time....
Old 06-28-2008 | 07:47 PM
  #45  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Confusion - because I like to title every post I make too ;)

Matthew Rox, your logic is all over the map!? You own FOUR vehicles, THREE of which are "gas guzzlers". Yet you're complaining about FUEL prices, and you didn't want to spend ~a couple hundred bucks to fix a (minor) leaky steering rack? So instead of doing regular maintenance on your car, you want to replace the car entirely, and you wanted a Mercedes, but cheaped out and bought a G8!?

So because of all that, you're concerned that the Camaro isn't going to sell?

Whatever . Sorry if I missed your point(s) completely .

Last edited by Capn Pete; 06-28-2008 at 07:49 PM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 AM.