2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Lack of Power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2009 | 05:40 AM
  #61  
christianjax's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 881
From: Jacksonville Florida
Looks like I walked into a cat fight.

Anyway, if I were the original poster, I would have a FEW rematches with the son in the T/A. (which I think he said was a 6M ?) If so, then the son is a pretty good driver to launch and beat the Auto Camaro. But a few races and he might wins some and loose some. The Camaro is new after all and new to him too. It will get faster with time, but not 8 lenths faster.
Old 06-15-2009 | 07:18 AM
  #62  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Useless name calling posts have been removed. Those who want to argue can do it elsewhere.
Old 06-15-2009 | 08:50 AM
  #63  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by BigBlueCruiser
He has run a QUALITATIVE CONTROLLED TEST
I have never seen anyone state that one street race is a "qualitative, controlled test." Was he spinning that run? Did he simply forget to turn off any electronic nannies (like traction control) that may have been bogging him down? Again, if he is still unconvinced that the car is making 400 HP as he originally stated, he should take his car to a dyno day, lay out the $40 or whatever for 3 pulls and see if it is making sensible numbers for the 400 HP rating. He stated that the car is "not making 400 HP", so a couple of dyno pulls is the most qualitative and controlled way to find out. My guess is that it is.

The bottom line is that an LS2 GTO probably IS quicker - same HP rating, lighter weight. I don't like it either, but I have personally long stated that the 5th Gen is too heavy. Looking at approximate pound-per-HP ratings

LS2 GTO 3750/400 = 9.375
LS1 F-body 3550/350 (realistic) = 10.14
L99 5th Gen 3900/400 = 9.75

2) The auto Camaro is a slow POS
Ahh, hyperbole and inflammatory comments on the interwebz is fun!

Last edited by Z28Wilson; 06-15-2009 at 10:10 AM.
Old 10-23-2010 | 09:39 AM
  #64  
Turboba6's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 10
I KNOW this is an old Thread but DAM, I had No IDEA that the L99 Cars were THAT SLOW!!!
Dam a New 5.0 Automatic runs ~ 12.9-13.10, and I;ve seen a Few Stock L99 Cars in the 14's at Cecil County Dragway...Dam!!

fwiw, I WAS Considering a New Automatic Camaro, I guess it's a 5.0 Now....
Old 10-24-2010 | 03:02 PM
  #65  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Originally Posted by Turboba6
I KNOW this is an old Thread but DAM, I had No IDEA that the L99 Cars were THAT SLOW!!!
Dam a New 5.0 Automatic runs ~ 12.9-13.10, and I;ve seen a Few Stock L99 Cars in the 14's at Cecil County Dragway...Dam!!

fwiw, I WAS Considering a New Automatic Camaro, I guess it's a 5.0 Now....
Consider the dialog here in this thread...
https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=779632
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Keenan
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
10
01-19-2023 01:24 PM
BLK1997Z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
13
05-07-2015 04:01 PM
ad356
LT1 Based Engine Tech
12
04-11-2015 11:30 PM
XtremeLt1
Car Audio and Electronics
12
09-13-2002 09:50 PM
Brian Demeter
Car Audio and Electronics
12
08-17-2002 09:07 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 AM.