2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

New Camaro in Road and Track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2008 | 09:36 PM
  #16  
hyperv6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 515
The SS should see something in the 8:15 time range and the Z should see something int he 7:50's. Both are realistic and very repsectable times.

Just to compare a M5 is around 8:14, Cobalt SS 8:22 and the HHR SS 8:44.

Anything under 9 min is a good time any lap under 8 min is damn respectable for the Green Hell.

Keep in mind GM does this at the same start and finsih line in production trim and tires all from a standing start.

Only mods are roll bars, safety harness, and so,me telemetry equipment. Un like some MFG who like to sneek in soft slick tires flying starts and other tricks to drop times.

Note the ZR-1 is expected do a 7:20's lap when anounced. they were in the 7:40 range on a wet track in a early test. A GM offical said he expected 7:20 when they were don on a dry track.

The GT-R just did 7:25 but I have not see if it was a standing start or stock trim.

As for Camaro Weight It should be under 4000 but not by much. It is smaller than the G8 and the G8 is right at 4000. You can do the math on a shorter car from there.
Old 06-05-2008 | 10:52 PM
  #17  
foxbat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 545
From: Tampa
anywhere near 4000 pounds and this car will lose a lot of appeal. if a portly 4th gen was 3400-3500 pounds, and current mustang gt is 3500 pounds this car better be in the same (or less) ballpark.
Old 06-06-2008 | 12:58 AM
  #18  
TCMcQueen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 61
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by foxbat
anywhere near 4000 pounds and this car will lose a lot of appeal. if a portly 4th gen was 3400-3500 pounds, and current mustang gt is 3500 pounds this car better be in the same (or less) ballpark.
I hate to break it to you but in all likeliness the base V8 will be around 3900 with the top dog being around 4100. There was never a snowball's chance in hell that GM could get 3500 out of the Zeta Arch.

If you want a 3500lbs 400+ HP car the MY2011 Mustang might be your only affordable option. Assuming the rumors pan out...which they might not. Cars are getting fatter, damned greenies and hippies keep feeding them.

Last edited by TCMcQueen; 06-06-2008 at 02:00 AM.
Old 06-06-2008 | 07:30 AM
  #19  
yellow_99_gt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 393
From: Houston Tx
Originally Posted by TCMcQueen
I hate to break it to you but in all likeliness the base V8 will be around 3900 with the top dog being around 4100. There was never a snowball's chance in hell that GM could get 3500 out of the Zeta Arch.

If you want a 3500lbs 400+ HP car the MY2011 Mustang might be your only affordable option. Assuming the rumors pan out...which they might not. Cars are getting fatter, damned greenies and hippies keep feeding them.
The Mustang won't be 3500 either. They're already at 3550 now. Add a 4 valve top half and a TR6060 to handle the power and you'd be looking at 3675 assuming everything else on the car stayed the same.
Old 06-06-2008 | 08:37 AM
  #20  
falchulk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,881
Originally Posted by TCMcQueen
I hate to break it to you but in all likeliness the base V8 will be around 3900 with the top dog being around 4100. There was never a snowball's chance in hell that GM could get 3500 out of the Zeta Arch.

If you want a 3500lbs 400+ HP car the MY2011 Mustang might be your only affordable option. Assuming the rumors pan out...which they might not. Cars are getting fatter, damned greenies and hippies keep feeding them.
really you could have that today.....provided you dont blak at premium gas. 08 GT with frpp supercharger. Factory warranty and 400hp+ with non intercooled option. No warranty ar 500+.
Old 06-06-2008 | 09:06 AM
  #21  
ChrisL's Avatar
2010 Camaro Moderator/Disciple
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,087
From: Chester, NY
Originally Posted by Z284ever
3700 pounds? You're about 400 pounds light.
we're talking Camaro, not Challenger.

Old 06-06-2008 | 09:07 AM
  #22  
ChrisL's Avatar
2010 Camaro Moderator/Disciple
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,087
From: Chester, NY
fyi... per Bret Vivian, who was in the passenger seat... they hit some snow squals when lapping the 'ring.
Old 06-06-2008 | 10:12 AM
  #23  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by ChrisL
we're talking Camaro, not Challenger.

So, you're saying that the Z/28 won't be over 4000 pounds?

Last edited by Z284ever; 06-06-2008 at 10:31 AM.
Old 06-06-2008 | 10:51 AM
  #24  
TCMcQueen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 61
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by yellow_99_gt
The Mustang won't be 3500 either. They're already at 3550 now. Add a 4 valve top half and a TR6060 to handle the power and you'd be looking at 3675 assuming everything else on the car stayed the same.
little birdies have been saying that the mustang is going on a diet. aiming to shave 200 off. hopefully it'll happen.
Old 06-06-2008 | 10:57 AM
  #25  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by Z284ever
So, you're saying that the Z/28 won't be over 4000 pounds?
I'd interpret that as a yes.
Old 06-06-2008 | 12:03 PM
  #26  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Z284ever
So, you're saying that the Z/28 won't be over 4000 pounds?
Could be some hair splitting. The Challenger is listed at about 4100+
3700 + 400 = 4100.
Old 06-06-2008 | 01:01 PM
  #27  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally Posted by Z284ever
So, you're saying that the Z/28 won't be over 4000 pounds?
Maybe he is talking about the SS which is the 'new' Z28.
Old 06-06-2008 | 06:25 PM
  #28  
8Banger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 362
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
Yes we know your concern and it's probably shared by everyone. But all we have to go on is what has been stated. Pricing is one of the last things to be figured before production starts and the Mustang price plan is the target of the Camaro price plan.

So until we get more info what else can be said?
Well, it's just a concern based on the article which stated that the V8 SS will
be in the mid-to upper-$30,000 range and based on what we've heard that they will be offering initially the LS, LT and SS. With the LS and LT being V6's that
leaves only the SS at that much higher price. Yes I know there is much speculation, I'm just hoping GM is listening and I'm sure they will, it's just that
I saw the article with their speculated pricing and it really got under my skin.
Old 06-06-2008 | 07:49 PM
  #29  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by 8Banger
Well, it's just a concern based on the article which stated that the V8 SS will
be in the mid-to upper-$30,000 range and based on what we've heard that they will be offering initially the LS, LT and SS. With the LS and LT being V6's that
leaves only the SS at that much higher price. Yes I know there is much speculation, I'm just hoping GM is listening and I'm sure they will, it's just that
I saw the article with their speculated pricing and it really got under my skin.
Yea the weight rumors have raised my eyebrows too. The Indy show is going to be very interesting. This car is on the verge of greatness but it's going to need some help to make it. I know that GM wants to bring out the lightest, quickest, and cheapest Camaro. But with the Zeta platform and some other current issues for them today we'll have to see how far from what we/they wanted to what we get.
Old 06-06-2008 | 10:56 PM
  #30  
foxbat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 545
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by TCMcQueen
I hate to break it to you but in all likeliness the base V8 will be around 3900 with the top dog being around 4100. There was never a snowball's chance in hell that GM could get 3500 out of the Zeta Arch.

If you want a 3500lbs 400+ HP car the MY2011 Mustang might be your only affordable option. Assuming the rumors pan out...which they might not. Cars are getting fatter, damned greenies and hippies keep feeding them.
this is something that has worried me from the very start of the 5th gen design - the size and weight. i lost interest in the gto because of it's 3900 pounds, and i'll likely lose interest in the 5th gen if it comes in heavier than my 4th gen which is already too bulky at 3500.

seriously, if the new 5th gen comes in at 4000pounds, i'll take the money i have for the camaro down payment and throw in a 425 hp motor on my 4th gen and keep it.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 AM.