2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

NEWS: Drop Top Customs creates Chevrolet Camaro T-Top

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2010 | 04:40 PM
  #1  
NewsBot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Automated News Poster
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,357
Arrow NEWS: Drop Top Customs creates Chevrolet Camaro T-Top

Filed under: Aftermarket, SEMA Show, Coupe, Etc., Chevrolet, GM



Drop Top Customs, an aftermarket customizer which typically creates convertibles, has created a T-Top kit for the Chevrolet Camaro. The Drop Top T-Top Camaro will make its debut at SEMA show this November and the company says most of its creations will come equipped with a supercharger, but Drop Top assures us that chassis flex isn't an issue. Sales begin shortly after its debut in Vegas next month and carry a sticker of $6,500.

[Source: Drop Top Customs via Inside Line]Drop Top Customs creates Chevrolet Camaro T-Top originally appeared on Autoblog on Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:29:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.



Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More...
Old 10-21-2010 | 06:17 PM
  #2  
HuJass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,224
From: CNY
Cool.
More pics, please.
Old 10-21-2010 | 06:18 PM
  #3  
graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,887
From: northeast Miss.
Leave it behind with the mullet hair cut it came in on.
Old 10-21-2010 | 06:18 PM
  #4  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
It looks a little odd.
Old 10-21-2010 | 06:33 PM
  #5  
94Camaro_Z_28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 888
From: La Porte City, Iowa
Sweet!!! Thats the one thing I wouldn't give up from my 4th gen.
Old 10-21-2010 | 09:17 PM
  #6  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
It looks a little odd.
I wasn't sure if I wanted to be the first to say it. But I agree...it looks good as far as craftsmanship...but not right on the car.

I got curious and threw together a very crude Photoshop of a targa top to see if I could figure out why. It looks fine from the front to the seats...but from the b-pillar back, it is all wrong. That is why T-tops don't work visually, either. See the attachment.

I wonder what their crash testing results are? Maybe I will ask them at SEMA.
Attached Thumbnails NEWS: Drop Top Customs creates Chevrolet Camaro T-Top-targa-top-camaro.jpg  
Old 10-21-2010 | 11:22 PM
  #7  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
It just looks odd with the rear quarter windows.
Old 10-21-2010 | 11:47 PM
  #8  
CharlzO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 130
From: Johnson City, NY
different angles would be good to view tho. Will be nice to see.
Old 10-22-2010 | 12:39 AM
  #9  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN


That's similar to the price premium one would pay for the convertible model. Which is what I would buy hands down. BUT, for the many people out there who think droptops compromise too much (safety, etc.) this would be cool.
Old 10-22-2010 | 06:04 AM
  #10  
HuJass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,224
From: CNY
I don't understand the comments about it looking odd because of the area over the back seat.
G-bodies were pillared coupes with fixed quarter glass and they had T-tops from, what, 1976 thru 1987. Nobody thought they looked strange.

We need more pictures. And from a natural human vantage point. Not looking down from a second story window or from a tall ladder.
Old 10-22-2010 | 07:39 AM
  #11  
TemplarKnight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 167
From: Lewisville, TX
Originally Posted by JasonD
I wasn't sure if I wanted to be the first to say it. But I agree...it looks good as far as craftsmanship...but not right on the car.

I got curious and threw together a very crude Photoshop of a targa top to see if I could figure out why. It looks fine from the front to the seats...but from the b-pillar back, it is all wrong. That is why T-tops don't work visually, either. See the attachment.

I wonder what their crash testing results are? Maybe I will ask them at SEMA.
You yelled at me on the podcast when I asked about this very thing. You said it would never be done.

WELL GUESS WHAT?!? THEY WENT OUT AND DID IT! GUESS WHO'S YELLING NOW?!?

Last edited by TemplarKnight; 10-22-2010 at 07:42 AM.
Old 10-22-2010 | 07:55 AM
  #12  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Exclamation

Originally Posted by TemplarKnight
You yelled at me on the podcast when I asked about this very thing. You said it would never be done.

WELL GUESS WHAT?!? THEY WENT OUT AND DID IT! GUESS WHO'S YELLING NOW?!?
Yell all you want, I have always said that a factory t-top option is incredibly unlikely to happen. This is aftermarket by a company mentioned in the first post.
Old 10-22-2010 | 08:16 AM
  #13  
TemplarKnight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 167
From: Lewisville, TX
Eh, I'm just joshing ya. I personally am not a big fan of t-tops anyways, I was just curious what they would look like on a 5th gem. I think if you want to take the roof off at times, a convertable is much better because you just pop the latches and press the button. With t tops you gotta get out and remove them then store them in your trunk. Though I guess it does give you proper time to reflect on whether any papers you might need are in a secure spot before hitting the open road.
Old 10-22-2010 | 12:48 PM
  #14  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally Posted by JasonD
I wasn't sure if I wanted to be the first to say it. But I agree...it looks good as far as craftsmanship...but not right on the car.

I got curious and threw together a very crude Photoshop of a targa top to see if I could figure out why. It looks fine from the front to the seats...but from the b-pillar back, it is all wrong. That is why T-tops don't work visually, either. See the attachment.

I wonder what their crash testing results are? Maybe I will ask them at SEMA.
Did they even crash test something like this?

At any rate, yes the t-tops don't work visually because of the design of the car. It isn't like a hatch where the b-pillar turns into the roof.

Originally Posted by HuJass
I don't understand the comments about it looking odd because of the area over the back seat.
G-bodies were pillared coupes with fixed quarter glass and they had T-tops from, what, 1976 thru 1987. Nobody thought they looked strange.

We need more pictures. And from a natural human vantage point. Not looking down from a second story window or from a tall ladder.
Eh I think they look a little odd too. However, they benefit from a slightly thicker and visible B-pillar that integrates the t-top cutout more fluidly. On the Camaro the B-pillar is blacked out to hide it, so the C-pillar swoops forward into the roof which looks like it simply ends abruptly where the t-tops are for no rhyme or reason.
Old 10-22-2010 | 01:31 PM
  #15  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by HuJass
I don't understand the comments about it looking odd because of the area over the back seat.
G-bodies were pillared coupes with fixed quarter glass and they had T-tops from, what, 1976 thru 1987. Nobody thought they looked strange.
I did, and still do.

Besides, the T-top G-bodies have a notch back rear window/roof-line so it actually isn't as dramatic. The 5th gen Camaro is more of a fastback.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 AM.