2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

NEWS: Electrician at GM plant fired over Camaro photo leak

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2008 | 08:10 PM
  #1  
NewsBot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Automated News Poster
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,357
Arrow NEWS: Electrician at GM plant fired over Camaro photo leak

An electrician working at General Motors' Oshawa Assembly Plant lost his job this past week after company officials linked him to the leak of several photos showing a prototype Camaro body shell. The photos found their way onto the internet May 22nd and were published by multiple major automotive websites, including Leftlane. [...]

More...
Old 05-31-2008 | 08:46 PM
  #2  
Chevycobb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,272
From: Georgia
holy crap. wonder how they tracked him to the pictures...well, they probably have cameras around there I guess
Old 05-31-2008 | 08:58 PM
  #3  
merlinsteele's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 201
From: U.S.
Ah well, sounds like his kid's friends got ahold of the phone and put them on the net...Bummer for him. I guess the temptation was too much. I can understand that!
Old 05-31-2008 | 09:14 PM
  #4  
FactoryZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 181
From: Southern Cali, USA
I hope this didn't ruin the worker's family. The leaked photos brought us all much joy. After 28 years on the job, he gets fired for trying to be cool with his kids. Bummer for him. Hope he gets another job quickly.
Old 05-31-2008 | 09:45 PM
  #5  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by FactoryZ
I hope this didn't ruin the worker's family. The leaked photos brought us all much joy. After 28 years on the job, he gets fired for trying to be cool with his kids. Bummer for him. Hope he gets another job quickly.
I say, about time. I'm glad GM is going after such folks. This yahoo knew he was doing wrong. He deserves everything coming his way for it.
Old 05-31-2008 | 09:53 PM
  #6  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
I don't see how those pictures were a big deal. They were nice for the Camaro public to see.

Last edited by IZ28; 05-31-2008 at 10:32 PM.
Old 05-31-2008 | 10:17 PM
  #7  
96SSConv#2033's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 126
From: New Orleans, LA
I can't find the exact quote, but when Lutz said to remove the camo wasn't it said that they look forward to enthusiasts to getting "spy shots" and sharing them?

B
Old 05-31-2008 | 11:10 PM
  #8  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,711
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by 96SSConv#2033
I can't find the exact quote, but when Lutz said to remove the camo wasn't it said that they look forward to enthusiasts to getting "spy shots" and sharing them?

B
It's one thing to capture a picture of a prototype on a public street or out in the open.

It's a 180 degree opposite when you take a picture on company property and publish or sell those pictures.

Imagine it this way. If someone catches you doing something embarrasing in public and photographs and publishes it, you have less legal rights than if someone goes into your house and does the same thing.
Old 05-31-2008 | 11:36 PM
  #9  
96SSConv#2033's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 126
From: New Orleans, LA
Originally Posted by guionM
It's one thing to capture a picture of a prototype on a public street or out in the open.

It's a 180 degree opposite when you take a picture on company property and publish or sell those pictures.

Imagine it this way. If someone catches you doing something embarrasing in public and photographs and publishes it, you have less legal rights than if someone goes into your house and does the same thing.
I know the difference. I deal with it where I work. I just wanted to see if someone would agree with something so rediculous.

I know the article says his kid's friend got his phone, but if he did sell them, I hope he got enough to replace his lost pension.

B
Old 05-31-2008 | 11:53 PM
  #10  
FactoryZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 181
From: Southern Cali, USA
Originally Posted by guionM
It's one thing to capture a picture of a prototype on a public street or out in the open.

It's a 180 degree opposite when you take a picture on company property and publish or sell those pictures.

Imagine it this way. If someone catches you doing something embarrasing in public and photographs and publishes it, you have less legal rights than if someone goes into your house and does the same thing.
Shouldn't the link on this website be deleted then?! Aren't we then just spreading the damage caused by this leak? I agree that he shouldn't have taken the pictures, but to have fired him after 28 years of service to GM seems over the top. I think the leak did more benefit than harm to the car.
Old 05-31-2008 | 11:58 PM
  #11  
ChrisL's Avatar
2010 Camaro Moderator/Disciple
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,087
From: Chester, NY
Each GM employee has to sign non-disclousre agreements as terms of employment. Big corporatoins have certain absolutes. GM has zero tolerance when that line is crossed.

Simply put, the guy had noting to gain and everything to lose when he took those pics. Under no uncertian terms did he know that. Sadly, he's paying the ultimate price because the pics got out.
Old 06-01-2008 | 01:46 AM
  #12  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,372
From: Kilgore TX 75662
not only that but it shows the inside of the plant which could possibly help the competition.

About 10 years ago I toured the Shreveport, LA assembly plant where they were building the S10. I pulled out a camera and the tour guide freaked out.
Old 06-01-2008 | 02:33 AM
  #13  
Sephiroth's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 28
From: the sea of cheese
Originally Posted by AdioSS
not only that but it shows the inside of the plant which could possibly help the competition.

About 10 years ago I toured the Shreveport, LA assembly plant where they were building the S10. I pulled out a camera and the tour guide freaked out.
I want it(Camaro) to be a success...but from everything I've been reading on here, its already lost.

3-5k+ over the GT, which is due for a big power boost in 3 years....and the gas prices, which who know's, but it doesn't look good all around for us( the enthusiasts).
Old 06-01-2008 | 03:19 AM
  #14  
HuJass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,224
From: CNY
I've showed this article to a few non-car enthusiasts and all of their reaction were:
"What's the big f-ing deal? It's just a car. Who cares? It's not like it's a national security issue."

I kinda agree. The guy should be punished, but not that severly. Give him his full pension and send him home. Kind of like a forced early retirement.
Remember, he didn't try to sell or publish these photos for his own gain. And it's not like Camaro is a secret anymore anyways.
I know, he signed a form, blah, blah, blah.
I think the punishment doesn't fit the crime and there's nothing anyone can say to change my mind.
Old 06-01-2008 | 09:10 AM
  #15  
ChrisL's Avatar
2010 Camaro Moderator/Disciple
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,087
From: Chester, NY
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
I want it(Camaro) to be a success...but from everything I've been reading on here, its already lost.

3-5k+ over the GT, which is due for a big power boost in 3 years....and the gas prices, which who know's, but it doesn't look good all around for us( the enthusiasts).
No one has spoken about price. Where did you pull theses numbers from? a ouiji board?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 AM.