2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

NEWS: GM Reportedly Calls "Game On" For Supercharged 550HP Camaro Z/28

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2009 | 08:38 AM
  #271  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by SSbaby
A point that is lost in some people's minds is the fact that the GT500 employs extra chassis stiffening to handle the torque (and weight) of the 5.4L S/C engine. This is something that the base model does without.
Actually I don't believe that is the case anymore, but I could be wrong.
Old 09-24-2009 | 09:27 AM
  #272  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,576
From: Arlington, Texas
Originally Posted by JasonD
When I asked John Fitzpatrick about it, here is his reply.



Thoughts?
"We're not going to build it"= They're not going to build it.
"We can't comment on future product"= They are going to build it, but don't want to talk about it.

Coupe in '10
Convertible in '11
Z28 in '12

Something new each year, just like GM always does.
Old 09-24-2009 | 09:40 AM
  #273  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by JasonD
When I asked John Fitzpatrick about it, here is his reply.



Thoughts?
I suppose that would depend on what sort of enthusiast consumer feedback he's getting. I know what I told him...
Old 09-24-2009 | 10:27 AM
  #274  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,576
From: Arlington, Texas
Charlie, would you go for an SS w/ all of the Z28 upgrades, minus the LSA? You could hotcam the LS3 and get basically LS7 power, w/ a 38xx lb package, and benefit from the Z28 improved handling and maybe steering.
Old 09-24-2009 | 10:35 AM
  #275  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by CLEAN
Charlie, would you go for an SS w/ all of the Z28 upgrades, minus the LSA? You could hotcam the LS3 and get basically LS7 power, w/ a 38xx lb package, and benefit from the Z28 improved handling and maybe steering.
You know, my preference has always been a hot NA motor in a lighter package. But everything needs to be fixed if you want people to call it "fun to drive". I mean WTF, my Cadillac has better steering and feels more eager to play than the Camaro. FIX THAT!!!

A less dorky steering wheel, and less weird shift **** would also be appreciated.
Old 09-24-2009 | 11:09 AM
  #276  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
I would suspect the Z/28 will be out before the convertible, but perhaps that's wishful thinking. If the "work" is already done, how difficult would it be to add it as a late model year add for MY2010; or perhaps bring it out next June as an early MY2011?

On the other-hand if it isn't slated for MY2012, and as others have suggested that the 6th gen Camaro may be out as soon as MY2014, would we better off waiting for an Alpha Z/28 instead?

If they are building a Zeta Z/28, they need to tell us when... soon. I would hate to be a Camaro enthusiast who goes out and purchases a 2010 SS and adds a supercharger, beefs up the suspension and does some "lightening", spending easily $20K for parts and labor customizing my Camaro, only to learn 6-12 months later that GM was bringing out a similar car called "Z/28" for less than what I've invested. Perhaps Jason can chime in how he feels on the subject since he's basically doing this as we speak.

(BTW, interesting article in the Nov. '09 Hot Rod on how with weight savings and bolt-ons they trimmed a 1SS down by ~80lbs and lowered its ET.)
Old 09-24-2009 | 11:13 AM
  #277  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
Actually I don't believe that is the case anymore, but I could be wrong.
I stand corrected on that point but one thing I'm almost certain of is that the Mustang's body will need reinforcement to pass 2012 safety mandates. Stiffening of the chassis as per the changes to the convertible are rumored to be introduced.
Old 09-24-2009 | 11:17 AM
  #278  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Originally Posted by jg95z28
I would hate to be a Camaro enthusiast who goes out and purchases a 2010 SS and adds a supercharger, beefs up the suspension and does some "lightening", spending easily $20K for parts and labor customizing my Camaro, only to learn 6-12 months later that GM was bringing out a similar car called "Z/28" for less than what I've invested. Perhaps Jason can chime in how he feels on the subject since he's basically doing this as we speak.
Indeed I am. Personally speaking...I always said that since they are not currently building a Z28, I will build my own. Well...sorta. For those who are not up to speed on my project, in the next two weeks I will be adding a Magnacharger, LS9 cam, long tube headers, exhaust, Pedder's coil overs/sway bars, etc. in preparation to be on display at SEMA this year. Project blog in my sig. Right now, I am just days away from initiating the entire transformation.

If they bring out a Z28, I have no problems with that. As much as I would like to have a Z28, it won't make my car any less of a monster that I am making it. Then perhaps one day I can trade up (or down?) to a Z28. We'll see, but IF they bring it out, I think it will be great for the Camaro product line overall.
Old 09-24-2009 | 11:23 AM
  #279  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
i would be pretty upset knowing about the z28 coming out. i have invested alot of money into what i am making out of my car. i would have rather just waited and bought a z28 and put less money into it and getting more out of it.i have said the same thing as Jason, if they arent making it, i will make my own, but better. since im so deep into my car now, trading it in isnt even an option. ill just have to make my own ss/z28.

Jason, is the ls9 cam only good if the car is boosted? or can some decent power gains be made with it N/A?
Old 09-24-2009 | 11:23 AM
  #280  
STOCK1SC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,049
From: Confederate States of America
Man this BS is still going on? Complain all you want, Chevy is going to build the car the way they want and if you don't want it don't buy it. I swear if I was GM product planning and read this thread I would say screw it and cancel the whole program, and let them live with what they have so far. 99% of the people buying these cars don't race them around a track, and the person who said they could delete 6 airbags, do you honestly think a major corporation trying to promote safety is going to pull a safety device out of a car and make it less safe? Let's get realistic with our hopes for this car. 200lb's isn't coming off of this car, safety equipment isn't coming off this car, and a racing suspension for 1% of owners most likely isn't gonna make it on this car. Can we just have the complaint thread started elsewhere and get back to just news about the Z28? Oh yeah it's gonna be called the Z28 also so get over that fact as well!
Old 09-24-2009 | 11:30 AM
  #281  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally Posted by boxerperson
You might be surprised. Many of the suspension bits are way heavier than they need to be because of the materials they used. 15lbs at each corner is very workable. There's in depth discussions of this on some of the Mustang forums. The stock rims are also quite heavy...3 or 4 pounds can be lost at each corner with that as well. The exhaust system is also needlessly heavy. With the development of the car now fully paid for, Ford is really trying to put it on a diet, as that's been the main concern with the car. I'm going to guess at a 175lb weight loss.
It is still a stretch. Unless they are using depleted uranium, I dunno I am not a part of Mustang design. The problem is that unless it was designed idiotically in the first place I still have a hard time believing even 15lbs per corner by switching to aluminum or chomemoly. I could buy new front control arms and save maybe 10lbs at front and none of those are really adequate for much cornering, just for drag. As for the exhaust system being needlessly heavy, they have to meet emissions and sound requirements. There probably are pounds to get out of there though. The thing about any forums is that most users are thinking in terms of mods that may be available and that they may have done to their cars. This isn't really a good comparison to a factory built car that has to be warrantied and they have to assume it will get driven every day.

The camaro has far more emotional appeal to me...it's a much better looking car, so I REALLY hope that a couple years down the line Chevrolet is able to do something similar with the SS. The SS uses steel versions of the suspension hardware on the CTS, doesn't it?
I think so, and switching would save a few pounds if they did it right but it isn't going to transform it from a GTO to an RX7 or anything.
Old 09-24-2009 | 11:32 AM
  #282  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by JasonD
If they bring out a Z28, I have no problems with that. As much as I would like to have a Z28, it won't make my car any less of a monster that I am making it. Then perhaps one day I can trade up (or down?) to a Z28. We'll see, but IF they bring it out, I think it will be great for the Camaro product line overall.
Some of us don't currently have that option. While I could purchase and install all the parts someone like you, Jason, are doing, I wouldn't be able to get it to pass emissions in California. That is supposed to change at some point, however right now my only option is to wait for GM to build it for me.

I was pretty much set to wait for HUD to be added to the 2SS and then I was going to purchase an aqua blue metallic L99. Now, I'm not so sure. Heck now the CTS coupe even intrigues me.
Old 09-24-2009 | 01:40 PM
  #283  
95redLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Not much I'm afraid. (Especially when you consider Shelby claims the GT500KR carbon fiber hood costs about $9,000.)
N thats a deal! it was 20k!
Old 09-24-2009 | 01:47 PM
  #284  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by 95redLT1
N thats a deal! it was 20k!
According to the article it started at $20k and they lowered it to $9k after complaints.

Heck its a Z/28 not a Shelby. Why not a fiberglass hood like they did on the 4th gens?

Although I wonder how much lighter either (fiberglass/carbon fiber) would be compared to the stock aluminum hood. (Yes, I know they'd be lighter... how much lighter is the question.)

According to the Hot Rod article, the GMPP shorty headers save 9lbs. I was also surprised how much the engine cover weighs.
Old 09-24-2009 | 02:52 PM
  #285  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
The Camaro hood is already aluminium....CF wouldn't be cost effective.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.