2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

NEWS: Hyundai Genesis Coupe Beats Camaro and Challenger in Power-to-Weight Ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2008 | 01:47 PM
  #91  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by Chewbacca
I'll grant you the acceleration and definitely the ride, but handling and braking? No way. Without getting back into it, this just isn't going to happen. Not using the same size tire as the old car. Weight kills, especially in what I do with my cars.

Not looking to debate this. I've been told many times to move on. So, sadly I have. After owning a '68, a new '91 and a new '96, this car just isn't for me. I remain hopeful for a potential 6th gen.

Wife, and near as I can tell... both. And if I can't get her to even drive a Cobalt SS, I seriously doubt I could get her to sit in a Hyundai. I'll suggest it though.

I'd love a C6 and very much prefer the look of those cars over the C5 but I'd have to have a Z06. That brings us back to what I said earlier... why bother spending the extra money? The C5 Z06 still has the C6 Z06 covered and the C6 Z51 is obviously slower than the C6 Z06. I'd really be behind the 8-ball with a "normal" Corvette. I've been seeing 10K - 25K mile '03 - '04 Z06s in the $28 - $32K range. An unbelievable bargain. Besides, most everything parts wise is cheaper on the old car. Parts do wear out when you drive the poo out of cars.

Remember I'm looking for a nice street car that can pull double duty and supplement the Camaro as a race car.

*EDIT* If you mean a Corvette for my wife... I've already suggested it. She doesn't want a 'vette for the same reason she doesn't want a Camaro.

She doesn't want a Camaro. Says it just isn't her. Honestly, I sort of agree with her. Then again, a Corvette isn't me and I'm evidently going to end up in one of those. *shrug*

Once again, I know weight doesn't matter to everybody. Once again, I'm sensitive to it because of what I do with my cars. A few hundred pounds makes a big difference. Trust me. I'm sure the GM engineers would heartily agree with me. My wife has seen firsthand what weight will do to different cars. She has seen/felt the difference in my car from stock to now and from my 3rd gen to this one. I guess she has become sensitive to it as well.

Saab is actually something we've not considered. Does the GM Card money work with Saab?
If you are absolutely off the new Camaro < actually a very nice car > front up for the C5 Z06. Not that difficult to get under 3K pounds.

It is on the useless list when it comes to passengers or all around utility. I does have a nice wheelbase and can scoot if needed.

My punishment is a bit harsher than Settlemire's, when it comes to leaving the GM fold...

Last edited by 1fastdog; 11-05-2008 at 01:51 PM.
Old 11-05-2008 | 01:55 PM
  #92  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Wow this thread has more twists, turns and flip flops than a poorly run Presidential campaign. Sorry John.
I was going to add that per a close friend locally at Kia engineering, stated that the Genesis coupe and sedan are not as closely related platform wise as say the Zeta G8 and Camaro. Thus the agrument that Hyundai built a low weight coupe from heavier sedan roots capable of handling V8 power doesn't hold up. The coupe is different.

But since this has turned into a find a car for Chewbacca's wife... I've got nothing. Good luck Korry my only advice is get the lady something that keeps her quiet because trying to get a woman something to make them happy isn't possible.
Old 11-05-2008 | 02:05 PM
  #93  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,497
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by Chewbacca
I'd love a C6 and very much prefer the look of those cars over the C5 but I'd have to have a Z06. That brings us back to what I said earlier... why bother spending the extra money? The C5 Z06 still has the C6 Z06 covered and the C6 Z51 is obviously slower than the C6 Z06. I'd really be behind the 8-ball with a "normal" Corvette. I've been seeing 10K - 25K mile '03 - '04 Z06s in the $28 - $32K range. An unbelievable bargain. Besides, most everything parts wise is cheaper on the old car. Parts do wear out when you drive the poo out of cars.
I'm confused.

"I'd have to have a Z06." Even with a C6? A C6 Z51 and a C5 Z06 are extremely close in performance, with a slight edge going to the C5. One or two mods on the C6 and you have a clear advantage.

"The C5 Z06 still has the C6 Z06 covered" What? The C6Z is by far the better-performing car in ever regard.

"I'd really be behind the 8-ball with a 'normal' Corvette." Again, what? We're talking about a DD for your wife, aren't we? It's not like she's going racing (except maybe for fun), right?
Old 11-05-2008 | 05:18 PM
  #94  
Chewbacca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 859
From: AR (PA born and fled)
Originally Posted by Diggs
The convertible has 2 doors.
Originally Posted by Chewbacca
I was just looking at Saab's site. No two doors? No sale.

The wife has stated that she doesn't want another four door. This took Acura and Lexus off the list from the get go. I know Lexus makes a two door in that hardtop 'vert but I refuse to let her drive something that hideous.

Originally Posted by 2010_5thgen
what about an altima coupe?
Had an Altima for a rental last year. I couldn't imagine living with that POS for the life of a loan.

Originally Posted by Eric77TA
What about the coupe that Toyota and Subaru are supposed to be working on? Supposedly it's small, RWD (or AWD with rear bias) and last I heard was for the 2010 model year. It's supposed to be the spiritual successor to the AE86 Corolla - but hopefully with a little sportier styling.

I'm curious to see how that car pans out. If it comes in at the 20k starting price they're looking for, I think it will do well.

Not sure when it's supposed to actually hit the streets, though.
I don't know anything about it. If it is something along the lines of a two door IS we may have a winner.

Originally Posted by 1fastdog
If you are absolutely off the new Camaro < actually a very nice car > front up for the C5 Z06. Not that difficult to get under 3K pounds.

It is on the useless list when it comes to passengers or all around utility. I does have a nice wheelbase and can scoot if needed.

My punishment is a bit harsher than Settlemire's, when it comes to leaving the GM fold...
I believe I've already mentioned (several times) that I'm going to do just that. I disagree with the utility statement. C5s have a surprising amount of room inside. Even the fixed roofs.

Originally Posted by JakeRobb
I'm confused.
We know.

Originally Posted by JakeRobb
"I'd have to have a Z06." Even with a C6? A C6 Z51 and a C5 Z06 are extremely close in performance, with a slight edge going to the C5. One or two mods on the C6 and you have a clear advantage.
Because I'm absolutely in love with the LS7. Because I can't mod the car in Super Stock.

Originally Posted by JakeRobb
"The C5 Z06 still has the C6 Z06 covered" What? The C6Z is by far the better-performing car in ever regard.
Wrong. Even after several years of development, the C6 Z06 still gets beat by the C5 when comparing driver apples to driver apples. I personally know of one racer who dumped his less than 1 year old C6 Z06 because he was getting beat by the older cars at every event. This guy is a national trophy winner in his previous C5 car.

Also, while not a primary concern for me, the C6 brakes are problematic for the track guys. Not only are the rotors vented in the wrong direction on one side of the car but the silly "padlet" system gets very expensive and just does not hold up even to that type of use.

Don't get me wrong, I covet that car like few others. But why pay more money for a more-expensive-to-maintain second place car? If / when the C6 demonstrates superiority over the C5 and it comes down in price, I will re-evaluate. Hopefully this will occur right around the time I get tired of the C5.

Originally Posted by JakeRobb
"I'd really be behind the 8-ball with a 'normal' Corvette." Again, what? We're talking about a DD for your wife, aren't we? It's not like she's going racing (except maybe for fun), right?
As I said in my response to your post, I suggested the Corvette to her but she doesn't want one for the same reason she doesn't want a Camaro.
Old 11-05-2008 | 05:46 PM
  #95  
Diggs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 8
From: Shawnee, KS
I don't know what a Lexus hardtop vert has to do with the Saab. Oh well, I tried. I hope you find what you're looking for.
Old 11-05-2008 | 06:22 PM
  #96  
Chewbacca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 859
From: AR (PA born and fled)
I thought you were talking about the convertible Lexus in that post. *shrug* I was simultaneously answering five posts and slipped.

In your original post yes I know you mentioned the Saab 'vert. My wife isn't looking for a convertible.
Old 11-05-2008 | 07:17 PM
  #97  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
Wow this thread has more twists, turns and flip flops than a poorly run Presidential campaign. Sorry John.
I was going to add that per a close friend locally at Kia engineering, stated that the Genesis coupe and sedan are not as closely related platform wise as say the Zeta G8 and Camaro. Thus the agrument that Hyundai built a low weight coupe from heavier sedan roots capable of handling V8 power doesn't hold up. The coupe is different.
I think the moral equivalent would be to shorten and lighten Zeta such that there was only space and strength for the DI 3.6. Supposedly, there is a project in Oz to do something like that.
Old 11-06-2008 | 03:36 AM
  #98  
Dragoneye's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 801
From: New York
Originally Posted by teal98
I think the moral equivalent would be to shorten and lighten Zeta such that there was only space and strength for the DI 3.6. Supposedly, there is a project in Oz to do something like that.
If true...then that formula could return slightly better than G8 GT performance...which is great, considering...
Old 11-06-2008 | 03:39 PM
  #99  
Black5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 138
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by TrickStang37
and at end of the day, Hyundai still has a higher resale value than a chevy.
What are you puffin on chief. We're not talking about toyota or honda here. Hyundia has a terrible resale value. Compare a sonata limited to a malibu LTZ and the chevy has a better resale by at least 3 thousand.
Old 11-08-2008 | 11:36 AM
  #100  
Chevymuscle311's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 53
Originally Posted by TrickStang37
and at end of the day, Hyundai still has a higher resale value than a chevy.
At the end of the day that doesnt matter. Chevys are worth keeping, Ford is what you would want to get rid of
Old 01-20-2009 | 12:52 AM
  #101  
changed1mg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Originally Posted by Black5thgen
What are you puffin on chief. We're not talking about toyota or honda here. Hyundia has a terrible resale value. Compare a sonata limited to a malibu LTZ and the chevy has a better resale by at least 3 thousand.
No offense, but you may wanna do some fact-checking, 5thGen.

According to AutomotiveLeaseGuide.com, Hyundai is on par with Chevrolet in resale value, so all those who used to talk about Hyundai not being a contender apparently haven't been paying attention since 2000. Hyundai sneaked up and stole a chunk of customers. Now it's up to the established players to step up and accept the challenge.

If you want to compare 2-door, 4-seater, RWD, V6, sports cars, at a price point around $25,000, you've got the Mustang, Camaro, Genesis. I'd include the 370Z and Challenger, but the 370Z doesn't have a backseat and the Challenger is a bit to big, IMO, for true comparison (but the American Muscle diehards might have something else to say about that. W/e.) To be honest, though the Genesis competes for sales with the Camaro and Mustang, it’s not really a pony car – it’s focus is too divided and doesn’t rely on nostalgia.

To get more specific, let's talk trim (I've heard enough people trying to compare Accords to Camaros and Camaro V-8s to Genesis V-6s.)
Mustang Coupe V6 Premium($21,479*, 210HP, {http://bp2.forddirect.fordvehicles.com/2009-Ford-Mustang#page=/Models/}, *Employee Pricing)
Camaro 1LT ($24,630, 304HP, {http://www.chevrolet.com/camaro/pdf/2010+Camaro+Specifications.pdf}, pg. 5)
Genesis 3.8 (G~$25,500 based on Korean spec V6 at around $27,000 USD with options similar to our 3.8 GT. {http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/05/first-hyundai-genesis-coupe-commercial-hits-korea-pricing-revea/})

See, when you think of it practically it's a pretty compelling comparison. Power-wise it's only a battle of the Camaro vs. Genesis, and that'll only be settled with a test-drive. Aesthetics are a subjective matter, so while I may like the Genesis' sleek lines a bit more than the crisp folds and muscles of the Camaro, someone else could point out the Genesis' odd-looking tiny grille. That's up to the consumer.

All that said, I’ve been checking out the Genesis pretty deeply, since I expect to be in the market within the year. I hadn’t considered the Camaro, but now I am (hence my arrival to the forum *hi*). I was looking at used G35s and the Genesis. I'd totally forgotten the Camaro was coming out; I'm not really a fan of that whole retro-styling-thing the American companies have been doing recently - I'm 23, what do I care if the car looks a little like the 1970 model? I also figured it'd be priced way over the Genesis, so now that I've heard some more about it and checked out some more info, I'm surprised (in a good way) to see it's a competitor to the Genesis Coupe.

So, yea, to everyone saying the Genesis isn't even a contender, this just goes to show you that the competition is whoever the consumer says it is.
Old 01-20-2009 | 09:35 PM
  #102  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Originally Posted by DvBoard
Hyundai: 3,402lbs and 310hp = 1hp per 10.97lbs @ $28,636

Yet somehow asking for a Camaro to be under 3500lbs was "too expensive"?
I dont think Camaro guys could live with the indignity of a Camaro that only had enough chassis to handle what a base V8 Mustang puts out in power.
Old 01-20-2009 | 09:53 PM
  #103  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Originally Posted by Dragoneye
Putting it on one that doesn't exist would have made more sense?
worked for Mustang, the S-197 is pretty much its own deal, it shared very little with the Lincoln LS and while the GT500 is a porker, the GT and V6 are comparitively light.

Granted, the Mustang does not have an IRS, but the penalty for including one would not place the weight no where near the 3700 lbs of the V6 F5 - then there is the whole matter of the F5's near show car appearence, something the S-197 didn't have to labor under as well.
Old 01-20-2009 | 10:00 PM
  #104  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Originally Posted by jg95z28
North American safety laws for manufacturing can be ignored
LMAO, did anybody catch the "How its Made" episode on zippers? They had guys in the zipper plant with no shoes or safety glasses, and had guys handling molten aluminum with little to protection as well.
Old 01-21-2009 | 01:45 AM
  #105  
TOO Z MAXX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 666
From: Stockton, Ca. USA
I thought weight didnt matter?? all this talk about weight and to the buying public it doesnt matter blah blah blah. I am taking bets that the 6th gen Camaro will be a lighter car.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 AM.