2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

NEWS: Lutz Offers Details on the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2007 | 10:58 AM
  #121  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
T-tops added twelve pounds to the weight of a 4th gen. Totally worth it.
They only added twelve pounds to the 4th gens because even the hardtop coupes beneath the skin were set-up to receive t-tops. That's why its possible to convert a hardtop to t-top so easily. How much weight was required to be added to all coupes for t-tops is the question.

Let's say for sake of argument its only 20-lbs total weight. To add even that slight amount of weight to the top of the car is silly if you are concerned with how the vehicle handles. It certainly raises the level of the center of mass, albeit so slightly, but enough to say a non t-top version would handle better.
Old 10-02-2007 | 11:00 AM
  #122  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,497
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by jg95z28
enough to say a non t-top version could handle better.
Fixed.
Old 10-02-2007 | 11:02 AM
  #123  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Fixed.
Trust me, an extra 20-lbs placed ~4-ft above the ground makes a world of difference.
Old 10-02-2007 | 11:22 AM
  #124  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,497
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Trust me, an extra 20-lbs placed ~4-ft above the ground makes a world of difference.
I'm not arguing that.

I'm just saying you can't assume.
Old 10-02-2007 | 11:23 AM
  #125  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
I'm not arguing that.

I'm just saying you can't assume.
Sure I can. I'm an engineer. It's my job to make assumptions and speculate on whether it will work or not.
Old 10-02-2007 | 11:33 AM
  #126  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,497
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Sure I can. I'm an engineer. It's my job to make assumptions and speculate on whether it will work or not.
Yeah, but you're not on the chassis setup team for Camaro, are you?

If you are, then you can assume. But I know from firsthand experience that engineers aren't good at assuming what other engineers will do, especially when the latter set of engineers are working under the direction of non-engineers.
Old 10-02-2007 | 12:53 PM
  #127  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Yeah, but you're not on the chassis setup team for Camaro, are you?
No. However my research for my thesis in Technical Writing my senior year in college was on chassis and suspension theory, design and fabrication.

Originally Posted by JakeRobb
If you are, then you can assume. But I know from firsthand experience that engineers aren't good at assuming what other engineers will do, especially when the latter set of engineers are working under the direction of non-engineers.
Wrong. We're talking basic laws of physics here. The center of mass of the vehicle is based upon where the weight is on the vehicle and the relationship to zero, or in this case the ground (track) level. Placing additional weight above the center of mass raises it (the vehicle's mass) higher in the plane. This creates instability in the vehicle, both from a handling and traction standpoint. (i.e. it will hurt 1/4 mile performance as well.) It’s why vehicles like SUVs are less stabile, and why people place additional weight above the rear wheels to improve traction.

While we're not talking about a substancial amount of weight here; however there is a measureable difference.
Old 10-02-2007 | 01:54 PM
  #128  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,497
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Wrong. We're talking basic laws of physics here.
No, see, I'm not arguing about the physics. You're right about the physics.

I'm saying that you can't assume that because you don't know what else they would change about the car at the same time. For instance, maybe they'd add weight somewhere else. Who knows? Maybe bigger brake rotors, which add unsprung rotating mass. You're an engineer, so I'll assume you know how bad that can be for handling.
Old 10-02-2007 | 02:10 PM
  #129  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
Nerd Fight!!!!!!!!

Lol!!!
Old 10-02-2007 | 03:05 PM
  #130  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Sorry I didn't read all of the pages but I'm thinking they are adding B-pillars so they can add T-tops.
Old 10-02-2007 | 03:08 PM
  #131  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Originally Posted by Gripenfelter
Sorry I didn't read all of the pages but I'm thinking they are adding B-pillars so they can add T-tops.
Might want to read the thread, Grippy.
Old 10-02-2007 | 03:10 PM
  #132  
jcamere94z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,512
From: Miami, FL, US
Originally Posted by Gripenfelter
Sorry I didn't read all of the pages but I'm thinking they are adding B-pillars so they can add T-tops.
nope.. they are adding B-pillars to lose weight. Period. They understand that weight is the enemy in all aspects and they wouldn't have choosen to do this unless they could do it without dramatically changing the exterior. So, i am not worried.
Old 10-02-2007 | 04:14 PM
  #133  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
Originally Posted by Z284ever
No, I said between 50-100 lbs.
Sorry, I do remember the part where you said Im not guessing. I fixed it.

Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
....which is why all of you took the time to whine about all of us that decided to reply to the original topic in the first place.

Lets just all be kool-aid drinking cheerleaders. Then things will be just grand.
I dont understand your logic sometimes. You tell Scott that youll continue to raise hell about Camaro being a possible pig but when other people complain we re whining...

Originally Posted by Doug Harden
I guess since I've known this info for over a year, I've long since gotten over it....I don't like it either, but whatcha' gonna' do?

Issues of weight, safety, sound and weatherseals aren't worth the trade offs to me.

That being said, are there any coupes being produced today that don't have a B-pillar?
CLK 350 there are probably others...



Originally Posted by Doug Harden
Nerd Fight!!!!!!!!

Lol!!!
LOL!

Last edited by 5thgen69camaro; 10-02-2007 at 04:18 PM.
Old 10-02-2007 | 04:36 PM
  #134  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Trust me, an extra 20-lbs placed ~4-ft above the ground makes a world of difference.
Its not unsprung....it can be transferred to the rear wheels....what's the problem?

Originally Posted by 5thgen69camaro
I dont understand your logic sometimes. You tell Scott that youll continue to raise hell about Camaro being a possible pig but when other people complain we re whining...
I don't think I told Scott that (though I suppose one could imply as much), and I wasn't 'whining' about the car....but rather commenting (whining) about others whining (commenting) about some of us commenting (whining) about the car....or something to that effect.

But if you want to call me a whiner too, I'm ok with it.

Just don't call me a kool-aid drinking cheerleader, and we're cool.

Bob

PS....I'd still pay the weight penalty for T-tops, and don't give a damn about B-pillars, but I'm also quite aware that I'm not getting T-tops. Just in case anybody is confused.
Old 10-02-2007 | 09:41 PM
  #135  
FactoryZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 181
From: Southern Cali, USA
Originally Posted by DvBoard
Why not have all 4 windows not roll down then by your justification? Hell, weld the wheels in place while your at it, they don't need to move.
Like I said. Enjoy your 4 power window mustang...they are kinda cute, get a matching polo and tennis racquet while you're at it.

An extra set of roll down windows is not going to be a deal breaker for me. Apparently it is for you. In fact, I DARE YOU to buy that mustang and refrain from ever buying a camaro.

Last edited by FactoryZ; 10-02-2007 at 09:43 PM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 AM.