2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Not Done Yet: Lutz says 'perhaps' to twin-turbo Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-16-2009 | 09:07 PM
  #1  
95redLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Not Done Yet: Lutz says 'perhaps' to twin-turbo Camaro



Apparently, if you put Bob Lutz in a room filled with journalists asking pointed questions about specific vehicles, you won't get the industry-standard "we don't comment on future product" line. Following Maximum Bob's recent revelations about the CTS-V Sport Wagon and Coupe, along with a hybrid Chevrolet Impala, Buick Regal GS and a Caprice SS, when InsideLine asked Lutz about a twin-turbo version of the Chevrolet Camaro he simply responded "perhaps."

In addition to confirming a production version of the limited edition Camaro Synergy shown at SEMA and murdered-out Camaro, Lutz hinted at the possibility of a production version of the boosted, 425-hp V6 Camaro GM created for Jay Leno for this month's SEMA show. While it's far from a confirmation – and we all know how these things go with Lutz – it could be an indication that Chevrolet may be looking to beat Ford to the punch by offering a turbo'd version of its pony car. The only question now is when we'll receive an email from GM's PR team issuing the prerequisite denials... or an announcement that Fritz Henderson will require Lutz to wear a ball-gag at all future media events.
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/16/n...-turbo-camaro/
Old 11-16-2009 | 10:05 PM
  #2  
Klypto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,418
From: New Orleans, LA
its prob a tease to get us to talk about it on the netz. good idea even though i doubt well see it. would love it though
Old 11-16-2009 | 10:58 PM
  #3  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
Z/26
Old 11-16-2009 | 11:01 PM
  #4  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209


It'd be cool if it happens. I hope they would bump up the LS3's output to keep it one step ahead.
Old 11-17-2009 | 01:05 AM
  #5  
Rob V's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 553
From: British Columbia, Canada
Or twin-turbo the LS3 as well...?
Old 11-17-2009 | 01:51 AM
  #6  
Mario92's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 31
From: somewhere in the usa
Maybe things to come? Z/28 Twin turboed?
Old 11-17-2009 | 09:09 AM
  #7  
2010_5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,482
From: ohio
ever since i saw that car and read about it, i think it would be a pretty cool z28. granted its not the v8 that the z28 is used to having but it sure would top some of the v8's it has had in the past. not to mention it would be an amazing handler. with the CAFE restrictions in place and new ones coming in place, it makes sense to do this. theres a reason this motor was in this car, and i think it is to do this. stir up talk and see what everyone thinks. it will be used somewhere in some vehicle. im sure. im all for it.
Old 11-17-2009 | 09:20 AM
  #8  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,497
From: Okemos, MI
I love that hood!

Originally Posted by Doug Harden
Z/26
No.

Old 11-17-2009 | 10:02 AM
  #9  
super83Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: City of Champions, MA, USA
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
I love that hood!



No.

Its funny how "SS" gets bashed in the future vehicle section for being slapped on not so worthy cars. No one ever mentions the butchery that GM already did to the Zxx moniker.
Old 11-17-2009 | 10:11 AM
  #10  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,497
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by super83Z
Its funny how "SS" gets bashed in the future vehicle section for being slapped on not so worthy cars. No one ever mentions the butchery that GM already did to the Zxx moniker.
I think that the Z24 Cavalier was, for its entire lifespan, a Zxx-worthy upgrade. The early Z24s with the 3.1L V6 and the 5-speed manual were a blast to drive! The later Z24s ('98+) weren't as torquey, but they were better in pretty much every other way.

The automatic-only Z26 Beretta and Z34 Monte Carlo might be a different story -- I never had any direct exposure to either of those -- but I'd argue that most people don't even remember those. For that matter, most people don't even recognize "Z28".

That doesn't even address the fact that the Zxx moniker is used for lots of different stuff. Z51 = performance suspension option, but never a badge. Z66 = street suspension for trucks, seen as a badge on Silverados and Avalanches. Z71 = off-road suspension for trucks. What GM has been consistent about is that Zxx is an RPO code indicating an optional suspension package. Sometimes there are other components that come along with that package, and sometimes there aren't.

Last edited by JakeRobb; 11-17-2009 at 10:14 AM.
Old 11-17-2009 | 10:49 AM
  #11  
DeuceGI's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 123
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
I think that the Z24 Cavalier was, for its entire lifespan, a Zxx-worthy upgrade. The early Z24s with the 3.1L V6 and the 5-speed manual were a blast to drive! The later Z24s ('98+) weren't as torquey, but they were better in pretty much every other way.
I'll concur with Jake. My '89 Z24 with Yokohamas & Konis would easily corner with (if not outcorner) my '97 Z28 with its stock setup. With 1LE stabilizer bars & 275/40-17 tires on the Camaro--not so much. Still the first gen Z24s definitely earned their "Z" status.
Old 11-17-2009 | 10:55 AM
  #12  
Mario92's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 31
From: somewhere in the usa
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
I love that hood!



No.

You mean this one?
Name:  IMGP0477.jpg
Views: 15
Size:  27.1 KB
Name:  IMGP0481.jpg
Views: 14
Size:  44.6 KB
Name:  IMGP0482.jpg
Views: 21
Size:  33.3 KB

Old 11-17-2009 | 11:26 AM
  #13  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Its not a moniker its just a flippin RPO code for cripesake.
Old 11-17-2009 | 11:45 AM
  #14  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
I think that the Z24 Cavalier was, for its entire lifespan, a Zxx-worthy upgrade. The early Z24s with the 3.1L V6 and the 5-speed manual were a blast to drive! The later Z24s ('98+) weren't as torquey, but they were better in pretty much every other way.
The early 2.8/3.1 Z24's were fun, great performing cars. They were easy to own and very popular. And like you said, their torquey V6 (with available manual trans) and upgraded chassis made them lots of fun to drive.

Chevy could do well with a reborn Z24 package.
Old 11-17-2009 | 02:36 PM
  #15  
81Z28355's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 329
From: Hemlock, Mich.
I find it hard to get excited over a car that with the added weight of twin turbo chargers and related components will be no better off than a Camaro SS weight wise and lack the V-8 tourqe monster between the fenders.

Camaro is a great looking car, but if you want the best all around performing 4 seat pony car I think Ford has this one in the bag. The next two years Mustang is really going to kick it up a notch.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 AM.