2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Now hear this........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2008 | 08:14 PM
  #121  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Originally Posted by IZ28
Have your fun while it lasts F*rd guys! When the top 5th Gens come out it's most likely gonna be more of the same all over again for you guys: a better performing car all-around, and redemption for Chevy guys! I highly doubt todays GM will let themselves be beat in ANY regard with it's competition unless we all get messed up over the gas prices and that MPG requirement nonsense.
Man, you guys have a complex that borders on neurotic (then again maybe I guess I hang out in a nice guy Mustang Forum and all the other Mustang sites are just frigg'n ******)
Old 04-04-2008 | 12:37 AM
  #122  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
Actually, that's what happens when some of your people come here and claim that your brand had something to do with our cars being on hiatus and that your top model in some way "bested" ours when we had nothing to possibly counter with anymore LOL. Some of you guys really need a clue if you think this is reality.

BTW, this is kinda a "nice guy" Camaro site. Until we have to deal with F*rd guys that is.

Last edited by IZ28; 04-04-2008 at 12:40 AM.
Old 04-04-2008 | 02:57 AM
  #123  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
Originally Posted by sharpe
............I hate how the 'Stangs always have the Terminator Cobras to brag about (nevermind they came out after the F-Body was discontinued).
this wasnt exactly factual information either........
Old 04-04-2008 | 09:54 AM
  #124  
BigBlueCruiser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 574
From: Richmond, TX
Originally Posted by IZ28
Actually, that's what happens when some of your people come here and claim that your brand had something to do with our cars being on hiatus and that your top model in some way "bested" ours when we had nothing to possibly counter with anymore LOL. Some of you guys really need a clue if you think this is reality.

BTW, this is kinda a "nice guy" Camaro site. Until we have to deal with F*rd guys that is.

There's nothing in GM's toybox in 2002 that could have answered the '03 Cobra.

That said, the stang's performance on the track had nothing to do with the Camaro being axed.
Old 04-04-2008 | 10:12 AM
  #125  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Originally Posted by BigBlueCruiser:
There's nothing in GM's toybox in 2002 that could have answered the '03 Cobra.
What was the 1/4 mile times for the '03 Cobra?

I had a buddy with an Red '02 SS Camaro running 12.8's, stock, with good tires.
Old 04-04-2008 | 10:21 AM
  #126  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
I went 12.6 @ 112 mph with my bone stock 04 (on stock tires - not good tires). Quickest bone stock pass I know of was a 12.4x @ 114 (guy named Ken Risher, and again, on stock tires).

On average, I'd suggest the 03/04 Cobra was ~.4 sec & ~5-6 mph quicker than the LS1 F-body.

On average.

Bob
(who is awaiting the 'ya, but it has a blower, yada yada yada' arguement)
Old 04-04-2008 | 10:24 AM
  #127  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
Originally Posted by BigBlueCruiser
There's nothing in GM's toybox in 2002 that could have answered the '03 Cobra.
You seem to be forgetting about the ZO6 Corvette.
Old 04-04-2008 | 01:47 PM
  #128  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Originally Posted by IZ28
BTW, this is kinda a "nice guy" Camaro site. Until we have to deal with F*rd guys that is.
So I've been told, and in general your right, although I'd hate to see the level of "enthusiasm" at other sites, it would probably make me wonder why there isn't litany of burnt hulks formerly resembling Mustangs all over the place.
Old 04-04-2008 | 02:40 PM
  #129  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
I went 12.6 @ 112 mph with my bone stock 04 (on stock tires - not good tires). Quickest bone stock pass I know of was a 12.4x @ 114 (guy named Ken Risher, and again, on stock tires).

On average, I'd suggest the 03/04 Cobra was ~.4 sec & ~5-6 mph quicker than the LS1 F-body.

On average.

Bob
(who is awaiting the 'ya, but it has a blower, yada yada yada' arguement)
Those times seem about right from what I've seen and heard of. There are certainly freak cars and days when everyhting lines up for a great pass in any car. The drivers well I think we're all freaks to some extent.

There should not be any comments that the 03-04 Cobra needs a supercharger to compete. I know that's the standard arguement. But Fords terminator program was quite extensive and I believe really pushed the edge of what could be done on the aged SN95 platform. IMO the SVT team did more with the terminator program than they did with the Cobra R programs in regards to getting that car to accelerate, stop and handle. And to think all this was done at the end of the Mustang generation with the all new 2005 on deck is a testiment to Ford's dedication to the brand and I'm sure a little bit to prowness of GM F-bodies that had raised the bar.

I have no doubt that the 03-04 Cobra will take it's place as one of the great performance benchmarks and if for nothing more than the modability. Looking at the prices the cars still command in the used car market shows that they were well recieved and still well liked. I think when we are at Barrett-Jackson in 2025 as older guys with more money and nostalgia the 03-04 Cobra will be regarded high with the 5.0L Fox and the GM Turbo V6 cars, ZR1's, Vipers and a myriad of SS, WS6 and Firehawk models as the most memorable from the 80's 90's and 2000's.

Last edited by 99SilverSS; 04-04-2008 at 10:48 PM.
Old 04-04-2008 | 05:36 PM
  #130  
8Banger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 362
Originally Posted by BigBlueCruiser
There's nothing in GM's toybox in 2002 that could have answered the '03 Cobra.
Seriously, who cares anyways. It was fast. but IMHO ugly as hell, interior
was horrible, and it rode like a log wagon. If I was 20 and all I cared about was power, then I guess I would be happy.
Old 04-05-2008 | 08:23 AM
  #131  
GMRULZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 195
From: chesapeake, va
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
I went 12.6 @ 112 mph with my bone stock 04 (on stock tires - not good tires). Quickest bone stock pass I know of was a 12.4x @ 114 (guy named Ken Risher, and again, on stock tires).

On average, I'd suggest the 03/04 Cobra was ~.4 sec & ~5-6 mph quicker than the LS1 F-body.

On average.

Bob
(who is awaiting the 'ya, but it has a blower, yada yada yada' arguement)

But its got a blower... j/k. My LS2 C6 went the exact same time bone stock on street tires 12.6@114. I see your still the better driver, since w/ the higher mph you would think I would have went a little faster... Although w/ just headers,CAI, tune, some drag radials and maybe some better driving it went 11.96@118.98.

Last edited by GMRULZ; 04-05-2008 at 08:25 AM.
Old 04-05-2008 | 06:12 PM
  #132  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,497
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by 90rocz
My interests are peaked...
Oh? Mine are piqued.

Originally Posted by jg95z28
Unfortunately they can't say much, although I suspect at least one of them will be on here griping about how much he hates the car.
I know I'm late to the game, but . Good thing Charlie's not one of the 12 (15).

Originally Posted by bossco
The GT500 mill is essentially a Ford GT engine
This is quite false. They are both supercharged 5.4L versions of Ford's mod motor. I think they share bore and stroke. There might be a some parts in common, but the supercharger is different, the intercooler is different, the rotating assembly is different. I think that even the heads are different.

Last edited by JakeRobb; 04-05-2008 at 07:22 PM.
Old 04-05-2008 | 06:48 PM
  #133  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by JakeRobb

I know I'm late to the game, but . Good think Charlie's not one of the 12 (15).
Good 'think' for who?

Actually, I was one of the 30 or 40 which the 12 were chosen from. I told them that if chosen, I would be brutally frank with my inputs to them.

Last edited by Z284ever; 04-05-2008 at 06:52 PM.
Old 04-05-2008 | 07:14 PM
  #134  
yellow_99_gt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 393
From: Houston Tx
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Oh? Mine are piqued.


I know I'm late to the game, but . Good think Charlie's not one of the 12 (15).


This is quite false. They are both supercharged 5.4L versions of Ford's mod motor. I think they share bore and stroke. There might be a some parts in common, but the supercharger is different, the intercooler is different, the rotating assembly is different. I think that even the heads are different.
Heads are pretty much the same but the block is different
Old 04-05-2008 | 07:20 PM
  #135  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Originally Posted by Z284ever
I told them that if chosen, I would be brutally frank with my inputs to them.
So did I. I believe it was a requirement to be chosen.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 AM.