2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Performance Predictions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2009 | 07:31 PM
  #1  
Fireball1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
Performance Predictions

I'm not sure when the press embargo ends, but we'll probably know if these predictions are accurate or not in a couple weeks:

2010 Camaro SS 6-speed manual

0-60: 4.4 sec
0-100: 11.0 sec
1/4-mile: 12.8 sec @ 110 mph
60-0: 112'
Skidpad: .92g
Slalom: 70 mph
MPG: 18

The above would be the most optimistic test results from a magazine that uses a 1' roll out and applies an environmental correction factor to the tested numbers as does Car and Driver magazine.
Old 03-02-2009 | 07:44 PM
  #2  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Originally Posted by Fireball1

0-60: 4.4 sec
i hope so but doubtful.
Old 03-02-2009 | 08:03 PM
  #3  
Logansneo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 141
I think that's probably going to be pretty close to what we see, especially if what GM spokespersons have already said about achieving a 4.6 second 0-60 with launch control on, and that it could probably go quicker than that (from the Indy 08 event).

Depending on rubber I don't see the Camaro having a problem breaking .95 lat G but we'll have to see. I do think that both V6 and V8 cars need mildly deeper gears, especially so the V6 can properly compete with the likes of the Genesis coupe and the 370Z, though the Nissan will probably compare closer with the SS.
Old 03-02-2009 | 08:07 PM
  #4  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
one quick **** for sure.
Old 03-02-2009 | 08:54 PM
  #5  
8Banger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 362
With a competent driver I see a 12.8 for sure. Be advised your results will likely be slower due to the fact that most up here probably suck at drag racing. Me included.
Old 03-02-2009 | 08:56 PM
  #6  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
i did a 13.8 in my 97 in my 3rd try. didn't think that was too shabby.
Old 03-02-2009 | 09:02 PM
  #7  
Logansneo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 141
Wink

Originally Posted by 97z28/m6
one quick **** for sure.
You daaaaamn straight!
Old 03-02-2009 | 09:06 PM
  #8  
8Banger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 362
Originally Posted by 97z28/m6
i did a 13.8 in my 97 in my 3rd try. didn't think that was too shabby.
For a 97 LT1, yeah that's not too shabby at all. Very nice.
Old 03-02-2009 | 09:07 PM
  #9  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Originally Posted by Logansneo
You daaaaamn straight!
the worst thing is once i drive a 6sd manual SS i know all my nitpicking will mean squat.
Old 03-02-2009 | 10:05 PM
  #10  
Steve0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,327
From: Hartford, CT
Quartermile... 12.8 @ 112 with a 6 speed.

All other stats I'd imagine would be right on par with the G8 GXP.
Old 03-02-2009 | 10:12 PM
  #11  
yellow_99_gt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 393
From: Houston Tx
imo, it has the power for mid 12's but the torque management and sorry 3.45 gear with a 28" tire is gonna hold it back. my predictions:

13.1 @ 109 avg car mag
13.3 @ 108 edmunds
13.7 @ 105 some guy on youtube
14.1 @ 99 somebody on pinks or pass time
12.8 @ 110 great driver in good air
12.6 @ 112 first shop to tune and test it
Old 03-02-2009 | 10:25 PM
  #12  
Logansneo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 141
Originally Posted by yellow_99_gt
imo, it has the power for mid 12's but the torque management and sorry 3.45 gear with a 28" tire is gonna hold it back. my predictions:

13.1 @ 109 avg car mag
13.3 @ 108 edmunds
13.7 @ 105 some guy on youtube
14.1 @ 99 somebody on pinks or pass time
12.8 @ 110 great driver in good air
12.6 @ 112 first shop to tune and test it
12.8 @ 110-112 probably Motor Trend.

Quartermile... 12.8 @ 112 with a 6 speed.

All other stats I'd imagine would be right on par with the G8 GXP.
I generally agree with that based on the gears in the GXP, but the curb weight, weight distribution, track width, wheelbase, and height of the Camaro I feel are going to allow it to outperform the GXP in handling and all around agility.
Old 03-02-2009 | 11:56 PM
  #13  
boomer78's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 253
12.8 (on a good day) - 13.4
depending on driver
Old 03-03-2009 | 12:29 AM
  #14  
Logansneo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 141
Originally Posted by boomer78
12.8 (on a good day) - 13.4
depending on driver
Again, it's all speculation at this point. But Motor Trend got the GXP to do the 1/4 mile in 13.0 @ 109.6 mph while Edmunds were only able to achieve 13.4 @ 105.9 mph. Edmunds tests outside Phoenix, Arizona and Motor Trend does it's tests in and around Irvine, California, so there's definitely an altitude issue.
Old 03-03-2009 | 07:32 AM
  #15  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Hmmm, my '02 Z28 w/headers and 3.90 gears pulled a 12.8 @ 110 .

Damn that heavy weight, eh?!

I'm sure the car can be made to work well. I think the torque management is probably WAY too aggressive, and once the programmers figure out how to get around it, the car will wake right up .

I'm still not sold on drive-by-wire either ... I think a manual throttle cable is still the most effective means of instant gratification .



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 AM.