2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

PICS! GM Accessories for Camaro revealed.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2008 | 10:49 AM
  #31  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
FNF 4!!

Looks like a slot car.

Don't like any of the accessories except for the lower rear valence.
Old 03-28-2008 | 10:51 AM
  #32  
ForYourMalice's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 204
From: Filthydelphia, PA
Originally Posted by Silverado C-10
They look "fake" to me.
A definitely possibility, but the fact that they're so glossy made me think otherwise. They completely take away the aggressive look of the front end.. they make it look so docile.

As far as the other pictures.. The wheels and the wing are especially offensive. The rear valence is ok..

Its cool that they are playing around with it, but they seem to be under the impression that they are designing accessories for a 94 Integra rather than a car with a muscle car heritage.
Old 03-28-2008 | 11:11 AM
  #33  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Painted clay, not photoshop.

Notice in the one shot it looks like they're also working on a low-rise rear spoiler.

I love the ground effects! And I actually like the silver wing. (I wouldn't mind seeing it as an option on the Z/28. )

Remember the video said they're working on a "grill". Even though those headlamps are fake, they're probably close to production.

I like the taller cowl hood. Could it possibly include functioning cowl induction?

There are several items I'm definitely going to consider.
Old 03-28-2008 | 11:14 AM
  #34  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
Please fire the SOB who "designed" that abortion of a rear spoiler........RICE not allowed on a Camaro........
Old 03-28-2008 | 11:17 AM
  #35  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by Doug Harden
Please fire the SOB who "designed" that abortion of a rear spoiler........RICE not allowed on a Camaro........
The taller red wing does look stupid... however the lower silver one isn't that bad.
Old 03-28-2008 | 11:28 AM
  #36  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
Also, would someone fix the links to the pics on the 1st post.....most are red X's.....
Old 03-28-2008 | 11:45 AM
  #37  
diarmadhi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 208
From: Phoenix AZ
Originally Posted by Doug Harden
Also, would someone fix the links to the pics on the 1st post.....most are red X's.....
Working on it!
Old 03-28-2008 | 11:46 AM
  #38  
terps's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 101
From: Great Lakes
Originally Posted by Doug Harden
Also, would someone fix the links to the pics on the 1st post.....most are red X's.....
OP linked it - http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3425

I think most of it is hot! JUst lose that crazy rear wing. Anyone think this thing looks like the GT-R from the profile shot?!
Old 03-28-2008 | 11:59 AM
  #39  
ChevalierSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 208
From: Central Kentucky
well, the grill insert has potential
Old 03-28-2008 | 12:38 PM
  #40  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
These pieces remind me once again why I prefer to keep my car stock-looking.
Old 03-28-2008 | 01:02 PM
  #41  
Hylton's Avatar
BBOMG Organizer
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 520
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Silverado C-10
I'm not. I think it looks like crap.

The hood looks a little different??? I love the hood. I'll pass on ALL the rest, especially the hideous spoiler.
Woohoo! C-10 is not afraid to speak his mind. I'll pass on it as well but there are a few here who like it so make it available as an option. Call it RPO GEN-Y. Anyone else think they copied the late '80s Z24 ground effects?
Old 03-28-2008 | 01:02 PM
  #42  
CamaroRick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 150
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
These pieces remind me once again why I prefer to keep my car stock-looking.
+1.....
Old 03-28-2008 | 01:18 PM
  #43  
cause4panic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 431
From: NYC
Are they gonna offer a tinted windsheild too

Silly people in nyc, driving around with limo tint on the windsheild.
Old 03-28-2008 | 01:20 PM
  #44  
bombebomb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855
From: Ohio
Im surprised no one has notice the "numbers" painted near the front fender blinker. Car is riced to heck, but I dont care rice = more potitial customers (my spelling rocks).
Old 03-28-2008 | 01:24 PM
  #45  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by bombebomb
Im surprised no one has notice the "numbers" painted near the front fender blinker. Car is riced to heck, but I dont care rice = more potitial customers (my spelling rocks).
Those aren't numbers. The driver's side says "RS", and the passenger side says "SS".



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.