A plea to FbodyFather
#16
Its suprisingly easy to work on a 4th gen...for swapping plugs the PIA is the AIR injection, its just in the way and never wants to go back on the right way, ditched that a long time ago. I can see the #8 plug being an issue for some.
Theres more room in a 3rd, but its really all the same thing. I guess the windshield extending over the cowl looks imposing...but the motor is in the same spot. Suspension/mounts/tranny/rear...all normal and pretty simple.
If someone is used to working on 60's, 70's muscle...i think they'll have a lot more to get used to on a 5th, than a 3rd/4th.
Theres more room in a 3rd, but its really all the same thing. I guess the windshield extending over the cowl looks imposing...but the motor is in the same spot. Suspension/mounts/tranny/rear...all normal and pretty simple.
If someone is used to working on 60's, 70's muscle...i think they'll have a lot more to get used to on a 5th, than a 3rd/4th.
#17
B
#18
um who said anything about ONE task? Ever tried to change O2 sensors on a V6? which Ive done 3 times trying to get my engine light to go out. What about plug wires (which I did once and had other techs do after twice over time) or a mess or other things? We can argue T Tops and B pillars and personal preference all day but now youre really talking about a reputation killer and people act like theres been no lesson learned.
#19
Ummm, no it doesn't. I had mine up to 75k miles and didn't need to change the plugs. Then for the next owner, he can change them once and then it's good for another 75k to 100k miles. Even if he pays $200 for someone to change them, $200 over the life of the car seems pretty cheap to me.
B
B
BTW While this is something that burns me up, Scott has said that the 5th gen will be easier to work on than the 4th gen. The windshield doesnt come as far forward. I cant imagine the 5th gens v6 block being as fat or any of the engines being as far back in the firewall.
#20
Now I relize my skills may be lacking to do doing the same thing the tech I paid to do the first time did. Also he put in a set of plugs for 200 in labor which I also did about a year later. Before I sold this wonderful machine at 240k miles or so I had a GM dealer put in a set of wires for $200 for the 3rd time since I bought it at 80k miles.
You can say whatever you like about me but I came to HATE that car. I didnt know that O2 sensor problems were so common that there are after market simulators and have seen simulators as suggested fixes in different forum threads as a soloution..
#21
BUT all of this means that you need to keep the vehicle long enough to get to that point. I don't plan on keeping it for 6 years. I don't even plan on keeping it longer than 2, so I get the oil changes and air filters. Not bad if you ask me.
B
#22
$200 if very acceptable to me. Lets do a little math. 100,000 miles, $200. At 15,000 miles traveled per year it would take 6.6 years before you need to change your plugs. $200 over 6.6 years = $30.30 per year, = $2.52 per month, or around 8 cents a day. Or you can say it costs an additional $0.002 per mile to operate the vehicle over 6.6 years.
BUT all of this means that you need to keep the vehicle long enough to get to that point. I don't plan on keeping it for 6 years. I don't even plan on keeping it longer than 2, so I get the oil changes and air filters. Not bad if you ask me.
B
BUT all of this means that you need to keep the vehicle long enough to get to that point. I don't plan on keeping it for 6 years. I don't even plan on keeping it longer than 2, so I get the oil changes and air filters. Not bad if you ask me.
B
Last edited by 5thgen69camaro; 10-14-2007 at 07:34 PM.
#23
$200 if very acceptable to me. Lets do a little math. 100,000 miles, $200. At 15,000 miles traveled per year it would take 6.6 years before you need to change your plugs. $200 over 6.6 years = $30.30 per year, = $2.52 per month, or around 8 cents a day. Or you can say it costs an additional $0.002 per mile to operate the vehicle over 6.6 years.
BUT all of this means that you need to keep the vehicle long enough to get to that point. I don't plan on keeping it for 6 years. I don't even plan on keeping it longer than 2, so I get the oil changes and air filters. Not bad if you ask me.
B
BUT all of this means that you need to keep the vehicle long enough to get to that point. I don't plan on keeping it for 6 years. I don't even plan on keeping it longer than 2, so I get the oil changes and air filters. Not bad if you ask me.
B
My whole point with this was not to see how many people could justify the beancounters role in auto manufacture. It was to hopefully get a little hand room in there to make things like this a doable job for either the guy at home, or the poor tech who gets stuck doing it at the dealership for those who choose that route. This is just such a simple thing to make right that would only cost the initial designer, what, 30 minutes on a CAD to figure out? Hell, if they can't spend the money on the design time, I'll do it for them. I can run Pro-E as well as anyone I think..
No excuse, and shame on the QA people who allow it to continue..
#24
Tell you what. Pull one of those magical 100K plugs, and check the gap (if there's any electrode left). I'll betcha it opens up to .080 or better. You'll be putting a fairly serious strain on your ignition system and not getting a good burn (less power, less milage, more emissions,etc..). I have NEVER seen a plug that kept it's gap for more than 20K miles, and that includes the new platinum/iridium/unobtainium uber plugs.
My whole point with this was not to see how many people could justify the beancounters role in auto manufacture. It was to hopefully get a little hand room in there to make things like this a doable job for either the guy at home, or the poor tech who gets stuck doing it at the dealership for those who choose that route. This is just such a simple thing to make right that would only cost the initial designer, what, 30 minutes on a CAD to figure out? Hell, if they can't spend the money on the design time, I'll do it for them. I can run Pro-E as well as anyone I think..
No excuse, and shame on the QA people who allow it to continue..
No excuse, and shame on the QA people who allow it to continue..
BUT, even with all that, I want it to be as easy as possible to work on. It makes for a better car overall if more people talk about how easy it is to work on/mod, and a cheaper car to repair if it needs to go in the shop.
B
#25
I can't believe this conversation is going on, right now...
I mean, yeah - the 4th gens in particular are a bit of a pain to work on...but the fact that I'm working on an LT1, LS1 as opposed to some "other" engine the 'bean-counters' could've popped in there, far outweighs any inconveniences.
Plus...uh, have you seen the concept's engine bay? get rid of that showy plastic covering everything up...and put all the accessories (that are currently in the trunk) back up front...that's what we're getting. I'm not trying to be a snot...but really!
I mean, yeah - the 4th gens in particular are a bit of a pain to work on...but the fact that I'm working on an LT1, LS1 as opposed to some "other" engine the 'bean-counters' could've popped in there, far outweighs any inconveniences.
Plus...uh, have you seen the concept's engine bay? get rid of that showy plastic covering everything up...and put all the accessories (that are currently in the trunk) back up front...that's what we're getting. I'm not trying to be a snot...but really!
#27
IIRC the SLA suspension up front made the shock towers as large as they are to make room for the upper A-arm...I believe the new 5th gen is going back to 3rd gen style struts which should open up the engine bay.
#28
That response is ABSOLOUTELY mind boggling! Not only does your logic affect a "small group of car enthusiasts" It affects EVERY single 4th gen Camaro buyers cost of ownership. Be it their added time or another techs. It amounts to higher maintence cost because engineering forethought was not considered in the design. Not only are you paying your Dealer tech MORE to change your freaking plugs, you are sittin in their waitting room LONGER to pay more. As you said, time is money! This is NOT a small issue and hits at a major failure of the 4th gen.
NOTE:
Don't get me wrong, I like cars that are easy to work on too. However, in todays highly competitive auto industry, manfacturers are tight with their pennies. Engineering for convenient serviceability is possible, but very expensive. These tasks can be completed, but do you really want to pay sigificantly more for a car just so a task takes a little less time
Last edited by matLT1; 10-15-2007 at 10:14 AM.
#29
I'll repost my thoughts when the question of an access panel for changing the fuel pump came up:
Like others have said, it's all about making money. Not that GM would PURPOSELY make something hard to work on, but what possible incentive would there be to make a car maintnance friendly? From a car manufacturer's point of view, I see none.
I'm a natural cynic, so take the following for what it's worth.
Do you really think that GM would waste extra design or manufacturing money/time/effort to create something that would enable the fuel pump to be changed in less than an hour? GM could care less.
I'm sure some Chevy dealer mechs know the real numbers, but being that I don't, I'll go ahead and GUESS that labor is $60 an hour and the standard time to change the pump (to include removing the exhaust, suspension, and tank) is 6 hours.
I can see an engineer talking to someone up top now: "Hey guys, here's a GREAT idea, lets design an access panel so you can change the fuel pump from inside the trunk. Wouldn't it be swell if our customers only had to pay our service departments $60 in labor instead of $360 to have a fuel pump changed?" I think the silence would be deafening.
......like I said though, I'm a cynic!
Do you really think that GM would waste extra design or manufacturing money/time/effort to create something that would enable the fuel pump to be changed in less than an hour? GM could care less.
I'm sure some Chevy dealer mechs know the real numbers, but being that I don't, I'll go ahead and GUESS that labor is $60 an hour and the standard time to change the pump (to include removing the exhaust, suspension, and tank) is 6 hours.
I can see an engineer talking to someone up top now: "Hey guys, here's a GREAT idea, lets design an access panel so you can change the fuel pump from inside the trunk. Wouldn't it be swell if our customers only had to pay our service departments $60 in labor instead of $360 to have a fuel pump changed?" I think the silence would be deafening.
......like I said though, I'm a cynic!
Like others have said, it's all about making money. Not that GM would PURPOSELY make something hard to work on, but what possible incentive would there be to make a car maintnance friendly? From a car manufacturer's point of view, I see none.
#30
In all honesty, the first few times I did these changes, it was a major PITA until made the decision to go ahead and remove what was in the way.
IOW, most of these complaints are because people want to go directly to the plugs and not spend the few minutes to remove things like starters and alternators on LT1's and coil packs on LS1's....that and having the right tools for the job.
It doesn't take any longer to remove these items as it does to loose a knuckle of layer of skin trying to shortcut the process.
Working on an LS1 car is LIGHT YEARS ahead of working on an LT1 car, so they are making great strides towards making it easier to work on.
IOW, most of these complaints are because people want to go directly to the plugs and not spend the few minutes to remove things like starters and alternators on LT1's and coil packs on LS1's....that and having the right tools for the job.
It doesn't take any longer to remove these items as it does to loose a knuckle of layer of skin trying to shortcut the process.
Working on an LS1 car is LIGHT YEARS ahead of working on an LT1 car, so they are making great strides towards making it easier to work on.