Post-announcement Q&A with Fbodfather...
#152
Re: Post-announcement Q&A with Fbodfather...
Originally Posted by JonCR96Z
I'm looking foward to it also. I'm just glad to see the current one gone. Wait a minute. 4 bucket seat, are you serious?. Nevermind, I take back all that I've ever said bad about it, I didn't realize it had 4 bucket seats.
I'm just joking with you. (im just gonna start telling everyone that I'm joking, since they don't get it otherwise) What I was getting at is the fact the while the current GTO is fine. We don't need another 3800lbs 400hp overpriced car. We need more than that.
I'm just joking with you. (im just gonna start telling everyone that I'm joking, since they don't get it otherwise) What I was getting at is the fact the while the current GTO is fine. We don't need another 3800lbs 400hp overpriced car. We need more than that.
Overpriced? I got mine during the employee-price-for-anyone special last fall. It ended up being around $29k (had about $1k in GM Mastercard rebates too) before sales tax. Seemed like a screaming deal to me, for a roomy four-seat 400HP IRS RWD coupe. And it still gives me that stupid grin every time the LS2 winds up past 6000 RPM
#153
Re: Post-announcement Q&A with Fbodfather...
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
GuionM may have been off a little on 4gen weight estimation (although I think he was darn close). But regardless of how close GuionM was to the actual LS1 Camaro SS curb weight, folks should keep this point above in mind. It's somewhat apples-oranges to compare the 4gen and 5gen. The 5gen is going to be heavier. But the styling, safety (don't forget, widening a car is one way carmakers are preserving tumblehome angles while also meeting new side crash and rollover specs) and functionality that extra weight enables will be keys to the new car's success, at least with the vast majority of buyers.
It seems like Guy is trying to soften the blow of what the 5th gen might weigh in by giving bloated 4th gen weight figures to make the two cars weight seem more comparable.
#154
Re: Post-announcement Q&A with Fbodfather...
Originally Posted by guionM
From GM's Press release on the 2002 Camaro:
(read: official, no-BS, from-the-factory, internet-fantasy-free, actual curb weight) for the base level (no option) Z28 Camaro hardtop.
5.7 coupe: 3405
5.7 convertible: 3535
Convertible F-bodies are 125 pounds heavier than non-t-tops.
Keeping to the low side of all these estimates:
T-tops are around 15-20. Leather is at least 5. That piping and heavier ram hood for the SS is at least another 10 pounds over a base Z28. The 275 tires and bigger 17" rims on the SS weigh at least another couple of pounds per corner over the standard 245/16s. Automatic transmission, at least 50 pounds (GM quotes 60#.... manuals dont have piping, wires, and most important...a tranny cooler up front).
That's 88 pounds....conservatively. Remember, I'm using the low end of these weight estimates.
And there's still numerous items like alarm, cd changer, etc that add a pound or 2 apiece over the base Z28's 3405 weight.
Most Z28 Camaros came in between the 3450 and 3480 curb weight. If you own a post 2000 Camaro Z28, go check the FROM THE FACTORY weight of your car. You'll most likely be over 3450 pounds unless you were hella stingy with the order list...... and that's if you drained the fuel tank.
Even assuming that Autoweb and others are weighing the car with a full tank of gas (where the 3577 number came from), that still puts a loaded automatic SS T-top at the 3500 mark. Convertible: 3600.
Alot of people mistakenly read the 3325 pound weight of the base model, no optioned, 3800 V6 5 speed and instantly think that's the weight of their LS1 Z28.
http://home.nc.rr.com/clarkotte/2002...ss_release.htm
http://www.autoweb.com/content/resea...andardFeatures
http://www.new-cars.com/2002/chevrol...fications.html
(read: official, no-BS, from-the-factory, internet-fantasy-free, actual curb weight) for the base level (no option) Z28 Camaro hardtop.
5.7 coupe: 3405
5.7 convertible: 3535
Convertible F-bodies are 125 pounds heavier than non-t-tops.
Keeping to the low side of all these estimates:
T-tops are around 15-20. Leather is at least 5. That piping and heavier ram hood for the SS is at least another 10 pounds over a base Z28. The 275 tires and bigger 17" rims on the SS weigh at least another couple of pounds per corner over the standard 245/16s. Automatic transmission, at least 50 pounds (GM quotes 60#.... manuals dont have piping, wires, and most important...a tranny cooler up front).
That's 88 pounds....conservatively. Remember, I'm using the low end of these weight estimates.
And there's still numerous items like alarm, cd changer, etc that add a pound or 2 apiece over the base Z28's 3405 weight.
Most Z28 Camaros came in between the 3450 and 3480 curb weight. If you own a post 2000 Camaro Z28, go check the FROM THE FACTORY weight of your car. You'll most likely be over 3450 pounds unless you were hella stingy with the order list...... and that's if you drained the fuel tank.
Even assuming that Autoweb and others are weighing the car with a full tank of gas (where the 3577 number came from), that still puts a loaded automatic SS T-top at the 3500 mark. Convertible: 3600.
Alot of people mistakenly read the 3325 pound weight of the base model, no optioned, 3800 V6 5 speed and instantly think that's the weight of their LS1 Z28.
http://home.nc.rr.com/clarkotte/2002...ss_release.htm
http://www.autoweb.com/content/resea...andardFeatures
http://www.new-cars.com/2002/chevrol...fications.html
*Here are some quick links I just pulled up off of this very board about curb weight
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showt...ht=curb+weight
Refer post 8
Refer post 21 (probably dry car though)
Refer post 24
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showt...ht=curb+weight
Refer post 24 (about the stripper car)
http://www.bfranker.badz28.com/fbody/weights.htm
Scroll down alittle on this page. According to this guys research, an LS1 with auto weighs LESS than an LS1 with t56.
I will see what else I can come up with.
Last edited by RussStang; 08-21-2006 at 09:48 PM.
#155
Re: Post-announcement Q&A with Fbodfather...
Originally Posted by Chris 96 WS6
Sounds like a plan.
Now somebody just has to remind me I made the offer once we get weight numbers. I'll be there this year on Sat. only, but obviously we don't have numbers yet...
Now somebody just has to remind me I made the offer once we get weight numbers. I'll be there this year on Sat. only, but obviously we don't have numbers yet...
Scott....you should try running for Political office somewhere.
Mark....good way of putting it.
Bob
#156
Re: Post-announcement Q&A with Fbodfather...
Originally Posted by guionM
From GM's Press release on the 2002 Camaro:
(read: official, no-BS, from-the-factory, internet-fantasy-free, actual curb weight) for the base level (no option) Z28 Camaro hardtop.
5.7 coupe: 3405
5.7 convertible: 3535
Convertible F-bodies are 125 pounds heavier than non-t-tops.
Keeping to the low side of all these estimates:
T-tops are around 15-20. Leather is at least 5. That piping and heavier ram hood for the SS is at least another 10 pounds over a base Z28. The 275 tires and bigger 17" rims on the SS weigh at least another couple of pounds per corner over the standard 245/16s. Automatic transmission, at least 50 pounds (GM quotes 60#.... manuals dont have piping, wires, and most important...a tranny cooler up front).
That's 88 pounds....conservatively. Remember, I'm using the low end of these weight estimates.
And there's still numerous items like alarm, cd changer, etc that add a pound or 2 apiece over the base Z28's 3405 weight.
Most Z28 Camaros came in between the 3450 and 3480 curb weight. If you own a post 2000 Camaro Z28, go check the FROM THE FACTORY weight of your car. You'll most likely be over 3450 pounds unless you were hella stingy with the order list...... and that's if you drained the fuel tank.
Even assuming that Autoweb and others are weighing the car with a full tank of gas (where the 3577 number came from), that still puts a loaded automatic SS T-top at the 3500 mark. Convertible: 3600.
Alot of people mistakenly read the 3325 pound weight of the base model, no optioned, 3800 V6 5 speed and instantly think that's the weight of their LS1 Z28.
http://home.nc.rr.com/clarkotte/2002...ss_release.htm
http://www.autoweb.com/content/resea...andardFeatures
http://www.new-cars.com/2002/chevrol...fications.html
(read: official, no-BS, from-the-factory, internet-fantasy-free, actual curb weight) for the base level (no option) Z28 Camaro hardtop.
5.7 coupe: 3405
5.7 convertible: 3535
Convertible F-bodies are 125 pounds heavier than non-t-tops.
Keeping to the low side of all these estimates:
T-tops are around 15-20. Leather is at least 5. That piping and heavier ram hood for the SS is at least another 10 pounds over a base Z28. The 275 tires and bigger 17" rims on the SS weigh at least another couple of pounds per corner over the standard 245/16s. Automatic transmission, at least 50 pounds (GM quotes 60#.... manuals dont have piping, wires, and most important...a tranny cooler up front).
That's 88 pounds....conservatively. Remember, I'm using the low end of these weight estimates.
And there's still numerous items like alarm, cd changer, etc that add a pound or 2 apiece over the base Z28's 3405 weight.
Most Z28 Camaros came in between the 3450 and 3480 curb weight. If you own a post 2000 Camaro Z28, go check the FROM THE FACTORY weight of your car. You'll most likely be over 3450 pounds unless you were hella stingy with the order list...... and that's if you drained the fuel tank.
Even assuming that Autoweb and others are weighing the car with a full tank of gas (where the 3577 number came from), that still puts a loaded automatic SS T-top at the 3500 mark. Convertible: 3600.
Alot of people mistakenly read the 3325 pound weight of the base model, no optioned, 3800 V6 5 speed and instantly think that's the weight of their LS1 Z28.
http://home.nc.rr.com/clarkotte/2002...ss_release.htm
http://www.autoweb.com/content/resea...andardFeatures
http://www.new-cars.com/2002/chevrol...fications.html
Again....My fully loaded SS....leather, t-tops, cd changer, whatever "crap" i'm missing....weighs 3400...actually it was 3390 to be exact! i'm not just looking at some article, i weighed the thing myself...
And going back to the cobra thing...i seriously doubt we'll see many full weight 07's taking out slightly or whatever modded 03/04's...last i checked 03's are blown...yet theres still a 300-400lbs difference
what does this mean to me? and you're right it may only be important to a few of us...
I don't want the camaro to have the same problem...
If i pull up to a 5th gen, or race one at the strip...i wanna get absolutely killed! I want to be forced into buying a new one...i remember when i only had my 3rd gen, and i would try to keep up with 4ths it just couldn't be done. It made me go out and get the 4ths that i have.
Its only concern guys, thats it...i'm not trying to rip the car, or those that have and are currently working very hard on it. I don't look at a car, and want it for its looks...its not the old days, its just plastic to me. I want to WANT the car...know what i mean?
Last edited by QATransAm; 08-21-2006 at 09:54 PM.
#157
Re: Post-announcement Q&A with Fbodfather...
That depends on what your defintion of "off" is. I have known far too many fbody owners who have weighed their cars on actual scales to know that no stock coupe fbody weighs 3577lbs.
If i pull up to a 5th gen, or race one at the strip...i wanna get absolutely killed! I want to be forced into buying a new one...i remember when i only had my 3rd gen, and i would try to keep up with 4ths it just couldn't be done. It made me go out and get the 4ths that i have.
Last edited by BigDarknFast; 08-21-2006 at 11:17 PM.
#158
Re: Post-announcement Q&A with Fbodfather...
What is "petit" to one might be a bit more meaningful to others. That doesn't make them right or wrong - just different. I agree 100% that most will put looks (ESPECIALLY looks), functionality (the least of the three) and features above - well above - curb weight.
The fact that I'm not one of those doesn't preclude me from making my statements.
And I'll say again...you can continue to add HP to at least partially make up for increases in weight (02 TA to 05 GTO is a shining example), but that doesn't change my arguement in the least. If it did, I'd probably be singing the praises of the 2007 Shelby - which will have no problem at all with your 200 lb lighter GTO.
Bob
PS...my 99 T/A (loaded, of course, as they all were) was 3660 lbs with me in it. Being just a bit generous, that would make it 3480 lbs w/o me and with ~1/4 tank of gas.
The fact that I'm not one of those doesn't preclude me from making my statements.
And I'll say again...you can continue to add HP to at least partially make up for increases in weight (02 TA to 05 GTO is a shining example), but that doesn't change my arguement in the least. If it did, I'd probably be singing the praises of the 2007 Shelby - which will have no problem at all with your 200 lb lighter GTO.
Bob
PS...my 99 T/A (loaded, of course, as they all were) was 3660 lbs with me in it. Being just a bit generous, that would make it 3480 lbs w/o me and with ~1/4 tank of gas.
#159
Re: Post-announcement Q&A with Fbodfather...
I was worried that VE piling on 250lbs was going to hurt its performance and handling. My concerns were unfounded as VE is the fastest and best handling Holden Commodore EVER... and by a big margin. The extra chassis stiffness endow's the car with so much more composure and the 50:50 f-r weight distribution and short overhangs also play a major role in aiding handling.
Personally, I find this talk of obesity rather pointless as Camaro is designed off the same platform as VE with arguably more favourable dimensions (given it's a 2 door) for performance/handling. I reckon GM will make this Camaro the best ever.. in every respect. I have faith.
I just don't know if I can hold out until 2009 as VE is soooo tempting!!!
Personally, I find this talk of obesity rather pointless as Camaro is designed off the same platform as VE with arguably more favourable dimensions (given it's a 2 door) for performance/handling. I reckon GM will make this Camaro the best ever.. in every respect. I have faith.
I just don't know if I can hold out until 2009 as VE is soooo tempting!!!
#160
Re: Post-announcement Q&A with Fbodfather...
Originally Posted by guionM
From GM's Press release on the 2002 Camaro:
(read: official, no-BS, from-the-factory, internet-fantasy-free, actual curb weight) for the base level (no option) Z28 Camaro hardtop.
5.7 coupe: 3405
5.7 convertible: 3535
Convertible F-bodies are 125 pounds heavier than non-t-tops.
Keeping to the low side of all these estimates:
T-tops are around 15-20. Leather is at least 5. That piping and heavier ram hood for the SS is at least another 10 pounds over a base Z28. The 275 tires and bigger 17" rims on the SS weigh at least another couple of pounds per corner over the standard 245/16s. Automatic transmission, at least 50 pounds (GM quotes 60#.... manuals dont have piping, wires, and most important...a tranny cooler up front).
That's 88 pounds....conservatively. Remember, I'm using the low end of these weight estimates.
And there's still numerous items like alarm, cd changer, etc that add a pound or 2 apiece over the base Z28's 3405 weight.
Most Z28 Camaros came in between the 3450 and 3480 curb weight. If you own a post 2000 Camaro Z28, go check the FROM THE FACTORY weight of your car. You'll most likely be over 3450 pounds unless you were hella stingy with the order list...... and that's if you drained the fuel tank.
Even assuming that Autoweb and others are weighing the car with a full tank of gas (where the 3577 number came from), that still puts a loaded automatic SS T-top at the 3500 mark. Convertible: 3600.
Alot of people mistakenly read the 3325 pound weight of the base model, no optioned, 3800 V6 5 speed and instantly think that's the weight of their LS1 Z28.
http://home.nc.rr.com/clarkotte/2002...ss_release.htm
http://www.autoweb.com/content/resea...andardFeatures
http://www.new-cars.com/2002/chevrol...fications.html
(read: official, no-BS, from-the-factory, internet-fantasy-free, actual curb weight) for the base level (no option) Z28 Camaro hardtop.
5.7 coupe: 3405
5.7 convertible: 3535
Convertible F-bodies are 125 pounds heavier than non-t-tops.
Keeping to the low side of all these estimates:
T-tops are around 15-20. Leather is at least 5. That piping and heavier ram hood for the SS is at least another 10 pounds over a base Z28. The 275 tires and bigger 17" rims on the SS weigh at least another couple of pounds per corner over the standard 245/16s. Automatic transmission, at least 50 pounds (GM quotes 60#.... manuals dont have piping, wires, and most important...a tranny cooler up front).
That's 88 pounds....conservatively. Remember, I'm using the low end of these weight estimates.
And there's still numerous items like alarm, cd changer, etc that add a pound or 2 apiece over the base Z28's 3405 weight.
Most Z28 Camaros came in between the 3450 and 3480 curb weight. If you own a post 2000 Camaro Z28, go check the FROM THE FACTORY weight of your car. You'll most likely be over 3450 pounds unless you were hella stingy with the order list...... and that's if you drained the fuel tank.
Even assuming that Autoweb and others are weighing the car with a full tank of gas (where the 3577 number came from), that still puts a loaded automatic SS T-top at the 3500 mark. Convertible: 3600.
Alot of people mistakenly read the 3325 pound weight of the base model, no optioned, 3800 V6 5 speed and instantly think that's the weight of their LS1 Z28.
http://home.nc.rr.com/clarkotte/2002...ss_release.htm
http://www.autoweb.com/content/resea...andardFeatures
http://www.new-cars.com/2002/chevrol...fications.html
#161
Re: Post-announcement Q&A with Fbodfather...
What is "petit" to one might be a bit more meaningful to others. That doesn't make them right or wrong - just different. I agree 100% that most will put looks (ESPECIALLY looks), functionality (the least of the three) and features above - well above - curb weight.
The fact that I'm not one of those doesn't preclude me from making my statements.
The fact that I'm not one of those doesn't preclude me from making my statements.
#163
Re: Post-announcement Q&A with Fbodfather...
My 1SC 2002 stripper Z28 weighed in at 3340lbs so they weren't that heavy if configured correctly, too bad you won't be able to get another one with the new style. Although rolling up the passenger side window at 70mph was both painful and dangerous!
#164
Re: Post-announcement Q&A with Fbodfather...
Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
Guy your getting yourself worked up over this. Just let them believe what they want to believe. If they have scales and weighing measurements that take off weight it will do the same for the 5th gen.
I've learned long ago that no matter what the facts are, people are going to believe whatever they want. When you post actual GM numbers and you still get people in denial, then it's best to leave them in their fantasy and move on.
So......
No guys, T-tops weigh nothing.
GM is wrong... automatics really are lighter than manuals.
Big 275 tires on 17 inch rims weigh the same as smaller rims and tires.
Leather is no different in weight than cloth.... even though comparing leather & cloth jackets say otherwise.
Fairy pixie dust made the SS hood & tubing lighter than the standard Z28.
Sure, I picked those numbers out of thin air... everything really weighs nothing.
Certain people were magically blessed with loaded Z28s and Camaro SS that weighs less than what GM's official weight for a base model, no optioned, Z28 hardtop.
There. That should make everyone feel better.
(Not said in a tone of anger or frustration... said in a tone of someone chuckling to themself as they go along with whatever it is that crazy uncle says, just so they can move along to something else more worthwile.... )
#165
Re: Post-announcement Q&A with Fbodfather...
Certain people were magically blessed with loaded Z28s and Camaro SS that weighs less than what GM's official weight for a base model, no optioned, Z28 hardtop.
There. That should make everyone feel better.
There. That should make everyone feel better.
I wonder how accurate some of these scales are, peeps keep quoting from. I'm sorry but I tend to put more credence in specs put out by GM and by official references like edmunds.com.