2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Senseless deaths -- what are YOU going to do about it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-2009 | 01:24 PM
  #31  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
I offer that one of the best things enthusiast can strive for is that we are viewed as responsible voices for vehicular enjoyment.

My idea of a good driving experience is is NOT being distracted by any of the outside world.

Whether it be distraction by a radio, issues in my relationships, issues that involve work, regardless... it's best enjoyed for me as just that...me and the car. I will not kill me or anyone else in the pursuit of a good experience. If that means I will go slower in a situation, worry more about everyone's survival as opposed to "winning"... fine. I and others will live as a result. Another better opportunity will come along.

The reality of any enthusiast of having any hope of keeping what they hold dear is exhibiting behaviour which is not percieved as being a part of a "problem".

Those that claim that pushing the envelope is OK should be willing to do a little to show that as being a valid point.

Dropping the ball in any endeavour will lead to punitive legislation. Like it or not, agree or not, that is how it works.

Avoiding causing negative effect to others in the pursuit of having fun with our vehicles will go far further in gaining respect over nearly any action our community could take.

We all escape the implications of how we drive on a regular basis. We all are the beneficiaries of a degree of good fortune, or more aptly characterized as "dumb luck" on many occasions. I offer that if you have not dodged a bullet, you have not pushed the envelope.
As enthusiast we need to encourage a tightship.

The fastest and most successful drivers I have ever known exhibit one common trait... the ability to focus. Part of that is a willingness to shut out distraction. I know some very fast SOB's. I'm not BS'ing you my friend. Smooth focused and totally aware. That IS the deal.

We are all on a fools errand if we attempt to defend holding a cell phone to our ear or entering a message which could be equally eloquent if done at a roadside location is not tempting fate.

Enthusiasts should take a lead to achieve a respected voice. To be seen as "better drivers" we need to deliver "better driver" goods.

Thus endeth the sermon from 1fastdog...

Last edited by 1fastdog; 07-13-2009 at 04:44 PM.
Old 07-13-2009 | 03:53 PM
  #32  
super83Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: City of Champions, MA, USA
While we are banning everything that can be done while driving, we should ban hot chicks walking on the side of the road. I swear I have almost gotten in more accidents looking at pretty girls/muscle cars than the phone has ever even come close to causing.

Don't lie you know everyone here has done the approaching Stop sign or redlight and your stareing at her/it then look forward and "Oh crap!" slam on the brakes.

Last edited by super83Z; 07-13-2009 at 03:56 PM.
Old 07-13-2009 | 04:00 PM
  #33  
JasonD's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 11,157
From: Nashville, TN area
Exactly...put the focus where it is due...the careless driver.
Old 07-13-2009 | 04:47 PM
  #34  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by super83Z
While we are banning everything that can be done while driving, we should ban hot chicks walking on the side of the road. I swear I have almost gotten in more accidents looking at pretty girls/muscle cars than the phone has ever even come close to causing.

Don't lie you know everyone here has done the approaching Stop sign or redlight and your stareing at her/it then look forward and "Oh crap!" slam on the brakes.
Naw... Pull over an ask the hotness if she might like a ride in some sweetness from Detroit. Problem solved.
Old 07-14-2009 | 08:27 AM
  #35  
95firehawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 694
From: Brighton, IL
Originally Posted by 69Camaro327
Because, clearly, this wouldn't create a situation where impairment could be just as bad, if not worse than when someone is talking on the phone. I know you say carefully, but the fact is that as careful as you could be you would still be taking your eyes off the road and hands off the wheel.

I'm not intending to attack you, more to point out the fine line presented here. Where do you end it? The radio causes distractions, so does carrying passengers, hell, the new 5th gen could be viewed as a distraction because of the amount of attention it receives. You guys can blast me if you choose to, but I talk on the phone while driving regularly. I am still very aware, still maintain my speed, and have not had any significant issues. The driving comes first, then the conversation. My car has bluetooth capability, but I prefer using my phone and will continue to do so until PA adopts the laws against them.
That's the exact kind of foolish mentality that gets innocent people killed. How is this statement any different than what you hear from a drunk guy at the bar? It's not. You're just replacing the method of impairment. And the arrogance of your last sentence just shows how little our society cares about anything but themselves.

Originally Posted by 69Camaro327
Ban being able to eat or drink anything at all while driving?


Originally Posted by speeding2fast2c
The difference is active or passive. Listening to music while driving is a passive task, which means you can go about doing that with out it really effecting your ability to drive. Talking on a cell phone, eating, tending to the kids in the back, doing makeup, reading, and so many more are all active task. They take away part of your attention to what you are doing weather you really know it or not.
Old 07-14-2009 | 08:55 AM
  #36  
seawolf06's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,034
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
…………and you have to ask yourself: “Why is it that intelligent people refuse to pay attention to traffic signs and signals?”
If they were intelligent then they wouldn't have refused to pay attention would they?

Natural Selection:

Mother Nature has been doing it for millions of years, why stop now?
Old 07-14-2009 | 09:23 AM
  #37  
km9v's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,296
From: Beaumont, TX
Originally Posted by briand069
This is exactly what I was going to say. I know for a fact on the rare occasion I have talked on the phone while driving I find myself slowing down and worst, not being aware of the cars around me. I always try to keep myself an out in case I need to avoid someone else. Even with my Bluetooth (both earpiece and radio equipped) I try to keep my conversations short. And sort of along the lines of this thread, here is proof that everyone, incuding law enforcement should obey laws. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...BAC418MCND.DTL


Brian
Every time i pass a LEO he's/she's usually on a cell phone.
Old 07-14-2009 | 02:27 PM
  #38  
69Camaro327's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 148
From: Southeastern PA
Originally Posted by King Moose SS
so me, my girlfriend hates it when I drive because I'm just saying "yea" all the time because I have no idea what shes talking about.
I'm typically the same way if I drive and talk on the phone. And let me clear this up, I am not the person that goes out of their way to make a call, or has the phone attached to their ear once the key hits the ignition. I will however answer if I get a call and the situation allows me to do so.

As for the passive vs. active argument, again, that is true. I do not dispute this whatsoever. That said, the scenario of receiving a call stating a loved one is injured or dead would in likely circumstances be a very rare call. I'm trying to think of other calls that could even come close to having a similar effect, but I'm drawing a blank.

Originally Posted by 95firehawk
That's the exact kind of foolish mentality that gets innocent people killed. How is this statement any different than what you hear from a drunk guy at the bar? It's not. You're just replacing the method of impairment. And the arrogance of your last sentence just shows how little our society cares about anything but themselves.
Yes, the method of impairment is the same, but the level of impairment is not. I know how I drive, and I know my ability to put my focus past the conversation. When I use the phone the most important thing is still the road and driving defensively, not the conversation.

Originally Posted by km9v
Every time i pass a LEO he's/she's usually on a cell phone.
This is another thing that annoys me. Now I know that some people will be up in arms stating that LEOs have special drivers training, but I cannot tell you how many times I have either passed or been passed by officers on their cell phones.

Last edited by 69Camaro327; 07-14-2009 at 02:29 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Formula Steve
New Member Introduction
4
09-19-2015 09:48 PM
colts0455
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
07-29-2015 12:28 AM
Boss002
Autocross and Road Racing Technique
2
07-24-2015 11:47 AM
Daves3rdGen87LT
3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech
10
02-01-2003 02:55 AM
josh
LT1 Based Engine Tech
4
01-25-2003 11:53 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 AM.