2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

SLP involvement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2005, 11:08 PM
  #76  
Registered User
 
turbo96z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: new jersey
Posts: 1,255
Re: SLP involvement

Originally Posted by Red Planet
well..........as I say..........we weren't allowed to talk about it.

I used to beam when I'd go to Spring Mountain.......we provided them with 10 new Corvettes and 10 new Camaro SSs..... all cars were stock...the SSs had stock suspension, not 1LE (the reason? we felt that you should be able to go out and buy one the next day........most dealers would not stock a 1LE)

So.......I'd watch some "Brand X" (hint....not Ford, not GM) owners, for instance, get out of the SS.......and grill us as to what mods we'd done to the cars. "You mean this $28,000 Chevy can perform that good on a track???" (after passing cars costing well over twice as much...or more)........ Yup!

hate to seem like i'm tapping you for info..... .....but did you have any direct influence on what was doen to the SSs in the LS1 years?
turbo96z28 is offline  
Old 12-12-2005, 11:13 PM
  #77  
Admin Emeritus
 
JasonD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Nashville, TN area
Posts: 11,157
Re: SLP involvement

I went to Spring Mountain (when it was known by another name) a few years ago, and I was the only one driving a Camaro SS. The others drove C5's and were purebred Corvette owners. I was also the youngest there. Needless to say, I was the odd man out, and they made it known that they didn't think I was quite in their league.

I didn't care, they sure had a hard time keeping up with me.
JasonD is offline  
Old 12-12-2005, 11:40 PM
  #78  
Registered User
 
detltu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Madisonville, Louisiana
Posts: 658
Re: SLP involvement

Originally Posted by JasonD
I went to Spring Mountain (when it was known by another name) a few years ago, and I was the only one driving a Camaro SS. The others drove C5's and were purebred Corvette owners. I was also the youngest there. Needless to say, I was the odd man out, and they made it known that they didn't think I was quite in their league.

I didn't care, they sure had a hard time keeping up with me.
I always wanted to go to B-S and plan on it when I get my 5th gen. Especially if Spring mountain gets some Camaros again (or the new Z06).

RP
Did you guys provide the cars or did B-S buy them at reduced cost or what?
detltu is offline  
Old 12-12-2005, 11:40 PM
  #79  
ALMIGHTY MEMBER
 
Fbodfather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Detroit, MI USA
Posts: 2,301
Re: SLP involvement

Originally Posted by turbo96z28
hate to seem like i'm tapping you for info..... .....but did you have any direct influence on what was doen to the SSs in the LS1 years?
yes.
Fbodfather is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 04:20 AM
  #80  
Registered User
 
DrewSG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 627
Re: SLP involvement

Originally Posted by demonspeed
IMO, after having both a SS and Z28, the SS seemed like an afterthought. I think the SS failed to the competition (besides brute power - which the Z28 had the SAME amount of power) in delivering a UNIQUE driving experience.
What competition did the SS have?
DrewSG is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 10:14 AM
  #81  
2010 Camaro Moderator/Disciple
 
ChrisL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 1,087
Re: SLP involvement

Originally Posted by turbo96z28
interesting. what was Team Corvettes opinion of that?
They came out with the Z06.



Could you imagine the outcry in Corvette nation if word got out a "lowly" Camaro was faster around a race course?

Those of you old enough may also remember the outcry from Vette owners when the Buick turbo V6 engines were around kicking C4 ***?
ChrisL is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 10:37 AM
  #82  
Registered User
 
Jason E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sarasota FL
Posts: 3,375
Re: SLP involvement

Originally Posted by Red Planet
Interestingly, it's been over 15 years since we built an IROC, but the 'brand awareness' of the IROC name still gives the average consumer the image of Camaro........even tho they used Chryslers and Firebirds after Chevy dropped the sponsorship. Lotsa brand equity there....but the sponsorship involves stupid amounts of money.
Maybe that should tell Chevy something

I've had customers tell me "that's a nice IROC you own!" as I've gotten out of my car at the dealership. People see a picture of me with my car on my desk here at the bank, and say "is that your IROC?" The brand equity in that name for the Camaro...is it as high as Z28?

One must ponder that, seeing as how my car IS a Z28, and to the unwashed my car IS an IROC People have probably called my Z28 an IROC more than calling it a Z28!

FWIW, I am all for bringing the IROC back as a special package Something tells me most will disagree, and something tells me I'm biased...and that's because I AM biased

turbo,
Shut up...I'm working on it A 350 IROC is still my dream Camaro...although, Scott is making it hard to divert excess funds to a 3rd. January will help me determine where my funds end up
Jason E is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 12:00 PM
  #83  
Registered User
 
turbo96z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: new jersey
Posts: 1,255
Re: SLP involvement

Originally Posted by Jason E
turbo,
Shut up...I'm working on it A 350 IROC is still my dream Camaro...although, Scott is making it hard to divert excess funds to a 3rd. January will help me determine where my funds end up

had to rib you alittle ......i'll keep my eyes open down here in ol'Jersey for you if you want. you'd die if you knew how many of them are around here.
turbo96z28 is offline  
Old 12-13-2005, 05:56 PM
  #84  
Registered User
 
91Z-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 685
Re: SLP involvement

I rarely see any in NY. When people ask me what my car looks like when they find out I have a Camaro, I tell them to think IROC. That acryonym defined a whole generation of Camaros.
91Z-28 is offline  
Old 12-14-2005, 06:41 AM
  #85  
Registered User
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 302
Re: SLP involvement

Originally Posted by Red Planet
How often does a stock SS have problems keeping away from a stock Z28? Well...if it's on a road course, it doesn't!

Now......I had to think about this for a while...but we did a Camaro Video for dealers and showrooms.....and we filmed it at what was Bragg-Smith in Nevada...(now Spring Mountain Motorsports Park) (great track, by the way....we still rent it to do chassis development work....)

Anyway.....we ran, as I recall 10 laps with a Mustang GT, a Z28 and an SS...same driver...same conditions...same day...same everything........

The Z28 averaged, as I recall a 4 second lead over the Mustang GT. The SS, on the other hand, had a 12 second........that's HUGE....advantage over the Mustang GT.

The SS had chassis tuning to perform better on the track. It rides more harshly than the Z....but the tradeoff is in better handling.

By the way......little known fact that we never were allowed to talk about. A 1999 Camaro SS with 1LE suspension was marginally faster on a road course than a 1999 C5 Corvette with Z51 suspension. Our own engineers would prove it at Milford and in Nevada.
Thanks for the reply.

I'm not talking so much about the road course as I am real world. Most people aren't ever going to push their cars at that sort of event - or even on the street. Drag racing, OTOH, brings out many people as it's not very expensive, easy to do on a Friday night, and you don't need to travel for the most part. Not to mention it's usually a bit easier to lay into the throttle at a light than it is to throw your car around turns during the middle of the day. See where I'm going with this?

So basically, what was the point in buying a SS over a Z28? If I would have been able to afford a brand new SS before discontinuation, I would have gone with a SS with the 1LE package. The fact is, I couldn't. Most SS's you see don't even have either the Bilstein or 1LE. So again, why? My 00 SS had the same deCarbons as my 01 Z28 had. The SS was supposedly just larger sway bars in 00-02, correct? IMO, my Z28 handled more neutral than my SS did - even though my Z had the comparably tiny tires with the huge sidewall. I'm no suspension or road racing/auto X guru, that's just normal driving I pushed to the limit on the street. I might be wrong, but that's just what I *thought* I felt.

So I go back to the Cobra vs SS comparison. It doesn't matter what year we talk about, SVT threw in a COMPLETE package. You got a Cobra, you got everything. You got the brakes, the suspension (no optional suspension - you got it all), and most of all, a lot more power (compared to the GT). It doesn't matter that it took a supercharger in 03/04, the fact of the matter is Ford executed the Cobra much better than GM or SLP did.

I know Scott, that you simply can't say the SS wasn't "worth it", but you can at least offer something in the way to explain why this was the case with the SS. If it has to do with the Corvette (which if that's what it is, please, enlighten us), then I think that's silly. We've now got a 505hp Z06 (which I'm sure is only going to get better), so IMO, that LS2 C6 shouldn't even be considered the performance "cap" for the rest of GM performance cars. With a 450hp+ Shelby coming out and a Challenger (which I'm sure by 2009 it'll be more than 425hp), the Camaro simply can't hide behind the Corvette.

Again, as a SS and Z28 owner, it is my opinion that the SS was wishful thinking playing on expectations of a heritage prowess (much like the HEMI explosion), and above all else, an afterthought.

I digress back to the SVTOA and owner experience. It is my wish to see something of the sort from GM like Ford and SVT have done with the SVTOA. I'd love to see a SSOA that would include every year of a Super Sport since the Impala wore that distintion back in 64 (I believe it was 64, correct?). I don't care that people think the new SS models are a joke, nor do I care about what I just said about the 4th gen SS. I would be more than happy to start a local chapter as well.

Putting all of my comments aside about why I thought the 4th gen SS wasn't living up to what it should have, I thoroughly enjoyed my experience while owning mine. I loved every minute of it, and I was very proud to be driving a Chevy SS. The marketing "ploy" I complained about worked on me I bought it because I always wanted a Camaro SS and I didn't care about anything else. I've had 4 Camaros, and I will continue to buy them as long as they are available. I hope to purchase another LS1 Camaro in the spring to keep me tidy until you guys give me a 5th gen. I am anxious and I hope you won't dissappoint.

Again, Scott, your comments on my thoughts are very much welcomed. Thank you for visiting the board.

Last edited by demonspeed; 12-14-2005 at 12:54 PM.
demonspeed is offline  
Old 12-14-2005, 06:53 AM
  #86  
Registered User
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 302
Re: SLP involvement

Originally Posted by DrewSG
What competition did the SS have?
The Cobra.

I'm not talking about just who's quicker, I'm talking about the complete package, the ownership experience, etc. It doesn't matter that the LS1 wooped the 32V modular (less-boost), the fact of the matter is Ford put a lot more power into the Cobra, whereas GM threw on pretty much a muffler and a hood scoop and called it a day in the power department. Sure, you might say they didn't need to pack more power to beat the Mustang in the ¼, but they should have packed more to make the SS a complete upgrade over the Z28 - just as the Cobra was a complete upgrade over the GT.

You guys are silly to also say that the Mustang sucked because they had to a put a blower on it. Who cares? They did it, they made more power, and are still making Mustangs. Stock for stock, the 03/04 Cobra blows away the 67-02 Camaro. Hell, mod for mod, look at the times and numbers those 03/04 guys are putting down. Would I rather have a Mustang? Nope. I'm just making a point.
demonspeed is offline  
Old 12-14-2005, 08:20 AM
  #87  
Registered User
 
DrewSG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 627
Re: SLP involvement

Originally Posted by demonspeed
The Cobra.

I'm not talking about just who's quicker, I'm talking about the complete package, the ownership experience, etc. It doesn't matter that the LS1 wooped the 32V modular (less-boost), the fact of the matter is Ford put a lot more power into the Cobra, whereas GM threw on pretty much a muffler and a hood scoop and called it a day in the power department. Sure, you might say they didn't need to pack more power to beat the Mustang in the ¼, but they should have packed more to make the SS a complete upgrade over the Z28 - just as the Cobra was a complete upgrade over the GT.

You guys are silly to also say that the Mustang sucked because they had to a put a blower on it. Who cares? They did it, they made more power, and are still making Mustangs. Stock for stock, the 03/04 Cobra blows away the 67-02 Camaro. Hell, mod for mod, look at the times and numbers those 03/04 guys are putting down. Would I rather have a Mustang? Nope. I'm just making a point.

I agree with what you're saying, but they didn't really need too. How much cooler would the SS's and WS6's been if they had only came with the LT4 or got an LS6? The Mustang needed a complete upgrade to compete on a performance level, the F-Body didn't.

I'm sure with the next Challenger and GT500 raising the stakes, GM knows it can't go at this half assed with $3000 badges
DrewSG is offline  
Old 12-14-2005, 08:40 AM
  #88  
Registered User
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 302
Re: SLP involvement

Originally Posted by DrewSG
I agree with what you're saying, but they didn't really need too. How much cooler would the SS's and WS6's been if they had only came with the LT4 or got an LS6? The Mustang needed a complete upgrade to compete on a performance level, the F-Body didn't.

I'm sure with the next Challenger and GT500 raising the stakes, GM knows it can't go at this half assed with $3000 badges
They didn't need to if all they cared about was getting to the finish line first (which is most important to many), BUT, for customer enthusiasm and PRIDE, then, it is my belief, that they should have looked at what Ford had done. Again, refer to my SVTOA references and the complete upgrades included when you made the purchase of a SVT product.

Let's just look at the past 20 years...

Monte Carlo and El Camino SS of the 80's got the L69 305 HO. Sure, it was less than stellar, but for the times, it was substantial.

94-96 Impala SS recieved the LT1, whereas the Caprice got the TBI.

04/05 Impala SS and Monte Carlo SS got the supercharged 3800.

Cobalt SS gets you either the blown LSJ 2.0 or the uplevel 2.4. It's a complete make over of the Cobalt too.

The Silverado SS received the 3/4 ton HO 6.0.

The C1500 454SS got that huge monster in a half-ton truck.

And look at the Trailblazer SS... That is the complete package I am refering to!

I think the only cars that didn't get anything special were the 00-05 NA MC SS's and the S10 SS. Though the 94/95 S10 SS had the HO 4.3 Vortec which I don't beleive was available with other S10's.

Just a little more to think about

Last edited by demonspeed; 12-14-2005 at 01:11 PM.
demonspeed is offline  
Old 12-14-2005, 11:59 AM
  #89  
Registered User
 
Jason E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sarasota FL
Posts: 3,375
Re: SLP involvement

Originally Posted by turbo96z28
had to rib you alittle ......i'll keep my eyes open down here in ol'Jersey for you if you want. you'd die if you knew how many of them are around here.
They're still clapping around here, too...just saw one on my way to work this morning. Thanks for the offer, but likely the kind of IROC I want I will find only in Hemmings or on eBay. While my Z28 has 62k miles on it (bought with 40k) and looks and drives like brand new (I have my dad's Formula to compare it to!!), the IROC I will buy will be a whole lot lower in mileage. I don't want anything with over 35k or so...and there are a lot of cars out there if I do a nationwide search. It has to be a 350 (or 305 TPI/stick), has to have t-tops, has to be black, grey, blue or maroon, has to have the uplevel cloth interior, has to have full power options, has to have G92 and has to be an '88-'89. The mileage limit is there because I want something as close to brand new as I can get, like my Z was. I don't want a car to restore, or a basket case, because to make it perfect it will cost me as much as buying a clean original! That's why I sold my Formula. I have turned down many a clean IROC solely because I want a perfect one, and am willing to pay for it. As you can see, that eliminates a ton of cars!! Add in the mileage factor, and I know I'll be spending $12-15k for one, based on today's prices...which means I'll need a home equity loan to buy it...

Which I am totally fine with
Jason E is offline  
Old 12-14-2005, 12:20 PM
  #90  
Registered User
 
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,801
Re: SLP involvement

Originally Posted by Red Planet
By the way......little known fact that we never were allowed to talk about. A 1999 Camaro SS with 1LE suspension was marginally faster on a road course than a 1999 C5 Corvette with Z51 suspension. Our own engineers would prove it at Milford and in Nevada.
And as I understand, this little known fact gave Dave Hill fits!

I've pulled this fact out several times on people only to get called a liar. Nice to get another confirmation on it.

Just goes to show you live axle is not a limitation on a properly set up car, not that I want to open up that can of worms again, LOL.
Chris 96 WS6 is offline  


Quick Reply: SLP involvement



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 PM.