SLP involvement
#106
Re: SLP involvement
Originally Posted by demonspeed
I think what he was saying is that they planned on putting the cars on hiatus about 2 years prior to the LS1 f body (meaning they were discussing it at that time). When he mentions 98/99, I believe Scott is just saying that was originally when the demise was supposed to be.
#108
Re: SLP involvement
Originally Posted by detltu
I always wanted to go to B-S and plan on it when I get my 5th gen. Especially if Spring mountain gets some Camaros again (or the new Z06).
RP
Did you guys provide the cars or did B-S buy them at reduced cost or what?
RP
Did you guys provide the cars or did B-S buy them at reduced cost or what?
#109
Re: SLP involvement
Scott - So did the LS1 F-bodies selectively get the truck cam and some get the vette cam ? Why were so many 4th gen LS1 cars putting down in some cases up to 320 hp at the rear wheels , the majority were at least 300 to the wheels , and then there were a few that actually only put down rear wheel figures that would better corrolate with a 305 hp crank rating ? IT would be interesting to here about
Cuz , you guys obviously knew from SS's to a reg. Formula ....they were making more and in some cases ALOT more than their 305-320( a few 345 hp cars ) advertised hp figures .
![Smilie](https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#111
Re: SLP involvement
Originally Posted by Aklaim
![Thinking](https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/images/smilies/think.gif)
#112
Re: SLP involvement
Originally Posted by demonspeed
After reading this thread, I don't hate SLP Engineering so much (actually now I'm glad they were around) - just some dislike for SLP Performance.
#113
Re: SLP involvement
Originally Posted by 90 Z28SS
Scott - So did the LS1 F-bodies selectively get the truck cam and some get the vette cam ? Why were so many 4th gen LS1 cars putting down in some cases up to 320 hp at the rear wheels , the majority were at least 300 to the wheels , and then there were a few that actually only put down rear wheel figures that would better corrolate with a 305 hp crank rating ? IT would be interesting to here about
Cuz , you guys obviously knew from SS's to a reg. Formula ....they were making more and in some cases ALOT more than their 305-320( a few 345 hp cars ) advertised hp figures .
![Smilie](https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
As to the cars putting down 320hp at the rear wheels...........well, let's just say that when we said "The Camaro SS -- and Firehawk have 325 hp" you can write it in the family Bible in indelible ink! EVERY car had at LEAST 325 hp. (you could say we 'lied' the good way........!!!)
<evilgrin>
#114
Re: SLP involvement
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
Oh believe me........SLP was a Godsend in my book.........trust me on this. I can't expect everyone to love them, but trust me......SLP was our friend!
#115
Re: SLP involvement
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
No...all Fbodies got the truck Cam. (can you imagine if we hadn't hadn't????) There's the old "Mine has an LS6 block" legend........well....in 2001 and 2002, they all have the same block. THe difference is that the 'bright silver' blocks were cast at Ste. Catharines, ONT and the darker blocks were cast in Mexico.
As to the cars putting down 320hp at the rear wheels...........well, let's just say that when we said "The Camaro SS -- and Firehawk have 325 hp" you can write it in the family Bible in indelible ink! EVERY car had at LEAST 325 hp. (you could say we 'lied' the good way........!!!)
<evilgrin>
As to the cars putting down 320hp at the rear wheels...........well, let's just say that when we said "The Camaro SS -- and Firehawk have 325 hp" you can write it in the family Bible in indelible ink! EVERY car had at LEAST 325 hp. (you could say we 'lied' the good way........!!!)
<evilgrin>
![Big Grin](https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#116
Re: SLP involvement
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
No...all Fbodies got the truck Cam. (can you imagine if we hadn't hadn't????) There's the old "Mine has an LS6 block" legend........well....in 2001 and 2002, they all have the same block. THe difference is that the 'bright silver' blocks were cast at Ste. Catharines, ONT and the darker blocks were cast in Mexico.
As to the cars putting down 320hp at the rear wheels...........well, let's just say that when we said "The Camaro SS -- and Firehawk have 325 hp" you can write it in the family Bible in indelible ink! EVERY car had at LEAST 325 hp. (you could say we 'lied' the good way........!!!)
<evilgrin>
As to the cars putting down 320hp at the rear wheels...........well, let's just say that when we said "The Camaro SS -- and Firehawk have 325 hp" you can write it in the family Bible in indelible ink! EVERY car had at LEAST 325 hp. (you could say we 'lied' the good way........!!!)
<evilgrin>
hmmmmmmm..........wonder if the lies will continue............in a good way...........
#119
Re: SLP involvement
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
No...all Fbodies got the truck Cam. (can you imagine if we hadn't hadn't????) There's the old "Mine has an LS6 block" legend........well....in 2001 and 2002, they all have the same block. THe difference is that the 'bright silver' blocks were cast at Ste. Catharines, ONT and the darker blocks were cast in Mexico.
As to the cars putting down 320hp at the rear wheels...........well, let's just say that when we said "The Camaro SS -- and Firehawk have 325 hp" you can write it in the family Bible in indelible ink! EVERY car had at LEAST 325 hp. (you could say we 'lied' the good way........!!!)
<evilgrin>
As to the cars putting down 320hp at the rear wheels...........well, let's just say that when we said "The Camaro SS -- and Firehawk have 325 hp" you can write it in the family Bible in indelible ink! EVERY car had at LEAST 325 hp. (you could say we 'lied' the good way........!!!)
<evilgrin>
#120
Re: SLP involvement
Originally Posted by Abidar
seriously... this Camaro Z28 only has 400 hp...