2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Some thoughts on the pictures........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2005 | 11:49 PM
  #181  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,179
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

Originally Posted by 91Z28350
Charlie,

You have really been pretty silent on the whole thing. I am curious to see what your take on it is.
Nah, I said some stuff on post #71.
Old 12-07-2005 | 11:51 PM
  #182  
derek411's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 47
Exclamation Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

Can somebody PM me this pics??? or PM me to get my e-mail, so I can see the pics. I'd really appreciate it, thanks.
Old 12-07-2005 | 11:59 PM
  #183  
91Z28350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,011
Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

Originally Posted by Z284ever
Nah, I said some stuff on post #71.
Ahh, sorry this thread exploded so fast, I missed it.
Old 12-08-2005 | 12:03 AM
  #184  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

I see it as retro as the Mustang and the Tbird. While not exact body lines, there is HEAVY influence of the rear quater, and front end. The tail lights are a mix of the 2 tail lens/ circle lights....which comes out ugly.
Again, I like the design, but Im saddended that they went this way with it. It will only be laughed at as a me too car, and made to appease enthuisasts that have wanted, a 200x, 1969 Camaro.
Old 12-08-2005 | 12:09 AM
  #185  
stars1010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,122
From: Houston
Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

Originally Posted by meissenation
It was said in the original ls1tech thread that johnnygmachine was at the same design clinic that the clay model was shown at; I don't know how much rumor or truth that is though.

BTW that was me making that claim and it was just my speculation from reading inbetween the lines here

But I think I'm right

Last edited by stars1010; 12-08-2005 at 12:11 AM.
Old 12-08-2005 | 12:09 AM
  #186  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

I am now throwing my interest towards the GTO. I wonder if the redesign will stay modern or will they make it retro as well. If there is a retro GTO, then GM has totally lost all thier marbles.
Old 12-08-2005 | 12:10 AM
  #187  
stars1010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,122
From: Houston
Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

Originally Posted by Tall Guy
Scott (Fbodfather) Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please (Did I say please?) make the car with enough head and leg room for people over 6' 5". Most sport cars are built for smaller people but there are plenty of tall people who very much enjoy the sports cars too. My Camaro is a little tight fitting for me, but I compromise fit for form for now. If i can comfortably fit (and shift) in new Camaro, then that is one more sold unit when the car comes out.

Respectfully,
Brian
Yeah I'll second that, I'm 6'6"
Old 12-08-2005 | 12:14 AM
  #188  
danno02SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 420
From: Pasadena,CA,USA
Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

Maybe I'll warm up to it after I see it in person.

I really like the C6 creases and overall stance. I can't get over the 1/4 panel treatment especially the windows. They crossed the heritage styling boundary into RETRODOM (i.e. instantly identifiable with specific years).

That being said if I showed these pics to my brother he would undoubtedly look into getting one (he loved his '69). I'm sure it will be a big hit with domestic owners but as someone mentioned earlier I don't see it getting too many import conquest sales.

Another thing that's bugging me. I showed these pics to a co-worker. His response: 'Yup just what I imagined it would look like, it's following the Mustang formula'

I'll really have to see it in person.
Old 12-08-2005 | 12:15 AM
  #189  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

Though I thought there were some problem areas with the styling, I like the direction its going in. If the concept turns out the way I think it will, its giong to obliterate the Mustang in the styling dept.
Much as I like the 05+ Mustang, I agree. If this concept is any indication (and I plan to follow the advice here and wait til seeing it at NAIAS before drawing any real conclusions)... Chevy will have a winner on their hands.

All this debate about 'retro'... IMHO there's a little too much hand-wringing going on. The Mustang has proven that retro can sell in big (HUGE) numbers. One aspect where I believe this Chevy concept has a leg up - it is clearly a modern, hard-edged interpretation of the early Camaro. That I like
Old 12-08-2005 | 12:16 AM
  #190  
turbo96z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,255
From: new jersey
Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

hey danno, how close is that to the car you saw at the clinic??????
Old 12-08-2005 | 12:19 AM
  #191  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

RP

I read you'd like some constructive input... I know the leaked images weren't of the final rendering... however I agree with some folk here re: the detail on the rear. I'm really hoping for a taillight finish similar to the recent SS concept (and not the original). The taillights of the leaked image really look overdone IMHO. I realize the rendering has a combination of sharp and organic lines but the rear lights is the only area of weakness that I can see in the whole exterior design.

The front lights don't look too bad... although I was hoping for conventional round lights like on Kris Horton's rendering... but top marks anyway. The leaked image is certainly of a car that lacks the confused front end look of the Mustang.

As I already indicated, the shape and basic lines are most appealing... just needs a minor clean up at the front and rear.

Cruel to be kind as they say... and only my 2c.

EDIT: OK I saw the pics again... and I retract my above statements. I'll leave the job to the designers for final design execution. It's a great job they've done and I have faith in their handywork.

Last edited by SSbaby; 12-08-2005 at 12:56 AM.
Old 12-08-2005 | 12:20 AM
  #192  
Caps94ZODG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,749
From: New England
Thumbs up Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

Originally Posted by derek411
Can somebody PM me this pics??? or PM me to get my e-mail, so I can see the pics. I'd really appreciate it, thanks.
well if someone is feeling generous. and im not a glomer but a contributor here..pass the favor along..

would love to give my thoughts...

just not at the right place at the right time...grrrr
Old 12-08-2005 | 12:22 AM
  #193  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

Originally Posted by danno02SS
Maybe I'll warm up to it after I see it in person.

I really like the C6 creases and overall stance. I can't get over the 1/4 panel treatment especially the windows. They crossed the heritage styling boundary into RETRODOM (i.e. instantly identifiable with specific years).

That being said if I showed these pics to my brother he would undoubtedly look into getting one (he loved his '69). I'm sure it will be a big hit with domestic owners but as someone mentioned earlier I don't see it getting too many import conquest sales.

Another thing that's bugging me. I showed these pics to a co-worker. His response: 'Yup just what I imagined it would look like, it's following the Mustang formula'

I'll really have to see it in person.
Danno when was your clinic, year? Were the tail lights more like the SS concept or squared off like this one? Also were there 69ish fender sweeps on the concept you saw? Was it squared like this or more rounded?

Please forgive the questions but I am trying to put the leaked clay onto a time table and your peices may be the biggest piece of information we have so far as timing.
Old 12-08-2005 | 12:25 AM
  #194  
danno02SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 420
From: Pasadena,CA,USA
Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

Originally Posted by turbo96z28
hey danno, how close is that to the car you saw at the clinic??????
Same stance.
Same hoodline. No Z/28 Cowl.
Slightly different grille. The one I saw had flush headlights (four total).
Different 1/4 panels. No creases or ducts.
Different 1/4 windows. Not from a 1st-gen.
Similar greenhouse, might have been a little taller.
Old 12-08-2005 | 12:26 AM
  #195  
eagleknight97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,495
From: Westmont, IL
Re: Some thoughts on the pictures........

Only thing im pretty adamant about getting, is a T-Top Option, somehow, someway, that woudl be so awesome to have again, or a Targa top, that woudl work too i suppose



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 AM.