2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Top Up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2007 | 09:03 PM
  #1  
JB22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 211
Top Up

Is there any pictures of the convertable with the top up?
Old 01-15-2007 | 09:15 PM
  #2  
Chevycobb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,272
From: Georgia
only photoshop versions. the vert concept does not have a top for it.
Old 01-15-2007 | 11:03 PM
  #3  
JB22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 211
bah!

too bad.
Old 01-16-2007 | 09:59 AM
  #4  
2000GTP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,312
From: Aurora, IL
Here ya go: http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=496241
Old 01-16-2007 | 12:16 PM
  #5  
terps's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 101
From: Great Lakes
Any chance in h*ll that there may be a hardtop design for production?
Old 01-16-2007 | 12:55 PM
  #6  
Chevycobb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,272
From: Georgia
wouldn't count on it due to cost of engineering it, cost for the car itself, then there is the issue with weight.
Old 01-16-2007 | 09:02 PM
  #7  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
Originally Posted by 2000GTP
Pretty sure that is not the top up chop.
Old 01-16-2007 | 09:23 PM
  #8  
JB22's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 211
Originally Posted by Plague
Pretty sure that is not the top up chop.
haha... yeah...
Old 01-16-2007 | 11:30 PM
  #9  
DvBoard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 940
From: Southern Indiana
Originally Posted by Chevycobb
wouldn't count on it due to cost of engineering it, cost for the car itself, then there is the issue with weight.
I wouldn't rule it out. I think people would get it if it was an option. I woudl prefer a hardtop convertable to a softtop myself if that's what i decide to look into buying.
Old 01-17-2007 | 02:14 AM
  #10  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by DvBoard
I wouldn't rule it out.
I would. Folks are already complaining about the Camaro's estimated curb weight and you want to add a hard top convertible? Forget about the cost angle for a moment and ask yourself what value it really adds when weight and performance would seriously be compromised to pull that off.

Sounds cool? Yes. But is it worth it?
Old 01-17-2007 | 08:14 AM
  #11  
EllwynX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,093
From: Southern NJ
Originally Posted by jg95z28
I would. Folks are already complaining about the Camaro's estimated curb weight and you want to add a hard top convertible? Forget about the cost angle for a moment and ask yourself what value it really adds when weight and performance would seriously be compromised to pull that off.

Sounds cool? Yes. But is it worth it?
Consider though, that the only ones complaining about the Camaro's weight are people such as those that frequent this site.

I don't know any 'average' that gives any consideration to the weight of the car at all.

A hardtop option would appeal to those who are looking for a great looking convertible, but aren't interested in the cars performance.

If they can make the G6 a hartop convertible loaded at just over $30,000 I can't see why they can't have the option on the Camaro as well. (Yes, I realize the G6 is a V6, I'm talking about the V6 model Camaro being loaded w/hardtop for just over $30,000.

Though the biggest hurdle I see to a hardtop convertible is that realy long roof the Camaro has. Could the trunk area even accomodate that huge thing?

Hardtop would be the only convertible I'd ever own personally.
Old 01-17-2007 | 08:57 AM
  #12  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
There will be NO hardtop convertible.

Weight, cost, and the total loss of trunk space are the main factors....that and the trunk opening (not the available space in the trunk) are getting tight on the ragtop as it is.
Old 01-17-2007 | 10:05 AM
  #13  
EllwynX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,093
From: Southern NJ
Originally Posted by Doug Harden
There will be NO hardtop convertible.

Weight, cost, and the total loss of trunk space are the main factors....that and the trunk opening (not the available space in the trunk) are getting tight on the ragtop as it is.
I never actually thought there would be. Just pointed out that there would be some people interested if there was. Most people I know agree with me, ragtops are ugly with the top up.
Old 01-17-2007 | 11:08 AM
  #14  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by EllwynX
I never actually thought there would be. Just pointed out that there would be some people interested if there was. Most people I know agree with me, ragtops are ugly with the top up.
You're right. Most are ugly with the top up. However even hardtop convertibles aren't as attractive as their coupe counterparts. IMHO, if you want a convertible, you sacrifice the looks of the top being up because you want all the pluses of having the top down. If looks are that important, then get a coupe. Besides convertibles aren't very practical most days of the year... outside warm weather states.
Old 01-17-2007 | 11:13 AM
  #15  
ChrisL's Avatar
2010 Camaro Moderator/Disciple
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,087
From: Chester, NY
and weight is NOT going to be an issue...

a message relayed from the Camaro CE to Scott at NAIAS

Originally Posted by Fbodfather
Doug Houlihan (Chief Engineer) flew in from "down under" for NAIAS industry days and also Charity Preview -- and a few meetings..... He has a message for the enthusiast community: "Tell them not to be concerned with weight - we've called Jenny Craig!!!"..........



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 AM.