Way to go GM...
03-10-2008 | 09:18 PM
#46
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
03-10-2008 | 09:25 PM
#47
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,749
From: New England
Originally Posted by Caps94ZODG
guys you realize that rear shot is by mistake and probably the guy taking the pic did not think he was going to be so close to a Camaro and used a wide angle lens while capturing it. This making it look all distorted. Its the camera fooling the eye. Dont worry that rear is not as butt ugly as that lens made it out ot be
guys you realize that rear shot is by mistake and probably the guy taking the pic did not think he was going to be so close to a Camaro and used a wide angle lens while capturing it. This making it look all distorted. Its the camera fooling the eye. Dont worry that rear is not as butt ugly as that lens made it out ot be
Ditto. I've seen the concepts in person multiple times, and while I know the car has changed slightly, there is NO way it looks that bad in person from the back. I think the rear 3/4 shot really looks awesome.
You can make an IROC-Z or a WS6 look terrible with a bad photographer.
You can make an IROC-Z or a WS6 look terrible with a bad photographer.
03-10-2008 | 09:27 PM
#48
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,092
From: lakeville, pa
03-10-2008 | 10:05 PM
#54
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,503
From: BFE, Ohio
Those aren't the production headlights
It could be for test equipment, not something that will be on the production version
I like it, the rear end looks similar to the C5 and C6 Corvettes, and the camera angles aren't that great. I think it is a car you have to see in person to really form an opinion about it. I think it looks smaller in those pictures, I still remember seeing a picture of a test mule parked next to a current Mustang and it was slightly smaller than the Mustang.
The interior...I'll have to wait and see it before a form an opinion on it as a whole, but I'm not a fan of the style of the speedo and tach.
It could be for test equipment, not something that will be on the production version
I like it, the rear end looks similar to the C5 and C6 Corvettes, and the camera angles aren't that great. I think it is a car you have to see in person to really form an opinion about it. I think it looks smaller in those pictures, I still remember seeing a picture of a test mule parked next to a current Mustang and it was slightly smaller than the Mustang.
The interior...I'll have to wait and see it before a form an opinion on it as a whole, but I'm not a fan of the style of the speedo and tach.
03-10-2008 | 10:06 PM
#55
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
I like the outside, hate the inside....so much so that it will probably prevent me from considering the car. Which disappoints me.
03-10-2008 | 10:13 PM
#56
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 27
From: In a Mineshaft
03-10-2008 | 10:28 PM
#57
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 411
From: Harrisburg, NC/Jacksonville, FL
03-10-2008 | 10:31 PM
#58
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,688
From: Middle of Kansas
03-10-2008 | 10:40 PM
#59
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,665
From: Livonia, Mi
How is straight on from behind an awful angle?! It's ugly no matter how you look at it. A spoiler would help, but those lights are hideous, the reverse lamps are retarded, and it just looks like they put no thought or effort into it.
