Weight distribution
#16
Thanks for the clarification Jake. I feel that these cars are quite exceptionally well balanced, on paper at least, and seem to be pretty competitive in that regard so far.
One area of weight distribution I personally feel is a crucial aspect that could dramatically enhance the Camaro's character is center of gravity, which is also affected in degrees by proper/improper f/r weight distribution. As it stands the Camaro isn't that far off the coveted 50/50 mark.
I still contend that an SS lowered 1"-1 1/2", with higher rate springs, stiffer struts, larger sway bars and possibly just a bit wider rubber (265 front / 295 rear) could probably alone shave a few tenths off 0-60 and 1/4 mile times, as well as dramatically improve lateral G. At the same time I would think this would give the Camaro better road/steering feel and overall responsiveness.
Consider that the above-mentioned mods would not only have no warranty-voiding problems, but would all be bolt-on solutions, as long as you could fit that wide of rubber on stock 20" wheels.
P.S. Sorry if I took your thread too far of subject Jake!
One area of weight distribution I personally feel is a crucial aspect that could dramatically enhance the Camaro's character is center of gravity, which is also affected in degrees by proper/improper f/r weight distribution. As it stands the Camaro isn't that far off the coveted 50/50 mark.
I still contend that an SS lowered 1"-1 1/2", with higher rate springs, stiffer struts, larger sway bars and possibly just a bit wider rubber (265 front / 295 rear) could probably alone shave a few tenths off 0-60 and 1/4 mile times, as well as dramatically improve lateral G. At the same time I would think this would give the Camaro better road/steering feel and overall responsiveness.
Consider that the above-mentioned mods would not only have no warranty-voiding problems, but would all be bolt-on solutions, as long as you could fit that wide of rubber on stock 20" wheels.
P.S. Sorry if I took your thread too far of subject Jake!
#17
From what I've heard, there's no room in the wheel wells for tires any wider than stock. You'd either have to tolerate the wheels sticking out of the sides (increases risk of paint chips, and looks awful, IMO), or you'd have to get/make some fender flares.
Nope, your post is well within the subject of this thread.
Nope, your post is well within the subject of this thread.
#19
And it doesn't look like the tire is sticking out any further than a stock SS....take a look for yourself:
LS7
SS
OK Jake, NOW I've gone off-page with this thread.......
Last edited by Logansneo; 05-07-2009 at 03:12 AM.
#22
Yeah, but how much modification would it really take to fit those tires? Probably wheel fitment with slightly offset backspacing/offset centering. It really shouldn't be that hard. The front tires would be a different story, I understand that because of inner/outer fender clearance, turn stops, and possible suspension component rubbing. In contrast 4th gen SS models cleared 275's up front, admittedly they were a completely different design.
Regardless of how you get bigger tires on the car, the point is how much the aforementioned mods have a potential to benefit the performance of the Camaro.
Oh, speaking of, thanks for the excellent research, Milk, on suspension/performance upgrades! Invaluable!
Regardless of how you get bigger tires on the car, the point is how much the aforementioned mods have a potential to benefit the performance of the Camaro.
Oh, speaking of, thanks for the excellent research, Milk, on suspension/performance upgrades! Invaluable!
#24
#25
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
09-14-2015 10:20 AM