View Poll Results: Which motor best fits the Z/28?
500 hp normally aspirated Gen V smallblock
92
77.97%
500 hp supercharged Gen IV smallblock
26
22.03%
Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll
Z/28 engine poll.
#1
Z/28 engine poll.
So we're debating this in multiple threads.
Here's the question - Which best fits the spirit of a 5th gen Z/28..... a heavier, thirstier 500 hp Gen IV supercharged 6.2 or a lighter, more compact, normally aspirated, direct injection 500 hp Gen V 6.2?
Here's the question - Which best fits the spirit of a 5th gen Z/28..... a heavier, thirstier 500 hp Gen IV supercharged 6.2 or a lighter, more compact, normally aspirated, direct injection 500 hp Gen V 6.2?
Last edited by Z284ever; 11-01-2007 at 12:49 AM.
#4
None of the above.....
Save the 500 horsepower for the SS. It'll be heavier and have a bunch of equipement I don't want. Just like the GT500.
The Z/28 should be the true enthusiasts machine, with as much weight savings as possible, an affordable (relatively) price, a nice clean revving NA V-8, a tighter suspension than the SS, etc. Cuz it's not about overall power, it's about balance. SS is the ****-fast cruiser and Z/28 is the road course warrior.
In all honesty I'd like to see a small displacement V-8 that can have the hell revved out of it. Like a version of the 5.3 that'll go to 7000rpm like the Z06 motor.
But I know we'll probably get the LS3. Which I certainly wouldn't complain about.
In any case....it should be N/A
Save the 500 horsepower for the SS. It'll be heavier and have a bunch of equipement I don't want. Just like the GT500.
The Z/28 should be the true enthusiasts machine, with as much weight savings as possible, an affordable (relatively) price, a nice clean revving NA V-8, a tighter suspension than the SS, etc. Cuz it's not about overall power, it's about balance. SS is the ****-fast cruiser and Z/28 is the road course warrior.
In all honesty I'd like to see a small displacement V-8 that can have the hell revved out of it. Like a version of the 5.3 that'll go to 7000rpm like the Z06 motor.
But I know we'll probably get the LS3. Which I certainly wouldn't complain about.
In any case....it should be N/A
#7
Are you guys forgetting that the LS7 (that's a 7.0L, remember ) revs to 7000 RPM, makes 500 HP, and is the exact same size externally as a 5.3L?!
I'm not trying to say that I would "expect" an LS7 in the Z/28 Camaro (had my pee-pee slapped enough times for the fact that "the LS7 is too expensive and won't be in production anymore " ) but my point is, there is no advantage to running a "lean, small displacement" engine, if we're looking for high-revving capability. GM already did that with 7 litres!!!
Point being? Give us a high-revving version of the 6.2L, naturally aspirated, to the tune of ~500 HP ..... and I'll be happy as a pig in $h!t!!
I'm not trying to say that I would "expect" an LS7 in the Z/28 Camaro (had my pee-pee slapped enough times for the fact that "the LS7 is too expensive and won't be in production anymore " ) but my point is, there is no advantage to running a "lean, small displacement" engine, if we're looking for high-revving capability. GM already did that with 7 litres!!!
Point being? Give us a high-revving version of the 6.2L, naturally aspirated, to the tune of ~500 HP ..... and I'll be happy as a pig in $h!t!!
#12
#13
My vote is for super charged. The way that those Mustangs run with a pulley and a few boltons I def. want a supercharged engine and I hope they build it as well as Ford so it can be tweaked to over 600Hp with boltons.
#14
#15
Still, I agree that I would rather have a big-cube naturally aspirated motor. I think I've said that multiple times.