2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion All 5th Generation Camaro technical discussion that doesn't fit in other forums

1/4 mile calculations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2008 | 02:09 AM
  #46  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by TrickStang37
that's the thing, i think the vette, for the most part, underperforms in the 1/4 compared to what it's really capable of.
Faster is always better I agree but we've now seen some LS3 Vettes running low 12's and a 11 sec pass in stock trim. Per HOTCIVIC's digging. Those times don't seem like an underachievement to me.
What would you consider a respectable time for an LS3 Vette?
Old 08-21-2008 | 03:00 AM
  #47  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
Faster is always better I agree but we've now seen some LS3 Vettes running low 12's and a 11 sec pass in stock trim. Per HOTCIVIC's digging. Those times don't seem like an underachievement to me.
What would you consider a respectable time for an LS3 Vette?
With their power to weight ratio, they should be above 114-115 more consistantly (auto's). The gearing really messes them up.
Old 08-21-2008 | 01:24 PM
  #48  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by TrickStang37
With their power to weight ratio, they should be above 114-115 more consistantly (auto's). The gearing really messes them up.
I didn't know that they didn't hit 114-115 on a consistant pace. Guess I've only read or heard about the manuals and they certainly do hit that speed if not more.
Old 08-21-2008 | 02:36 PM
  #49  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
I didn't know that they didn't hit 114-115 on a consistant pace. Guess I've only read or heard about the manuals and they certainly do hit that speed if not more.
they do hit 114-115, but they should be more consistantly at 116+. Its that terrible rear end gear the auto's have that negates that great gearing the transmission has.
Old 08-21-2008 | 03:19 PM
  #50  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by TrickStang37
they do hit 114-115, but they should be more consistantly at 116+. Its that terrible rear end gear the auto's have that negates that great gearing the transmission has.
I take it you're not a fan of the 2.56. I can only surmise that GM wanted to give the A6 good low end acceleration around town hense the trans ratios being taller than those on the M6 but had to worry about fuel economy too. The M6 gets a rated 16/26 and the A6 gets 15/25. Had they stuck a 2.73, 3.07 or 3.23 in the back the mileage may have suffered. To that I would've said drop the ratios on the 5th and 6th gear overdrive. Maybe it wasn't an option.

It's interesting that GM has different trans ratios for the M6 in the Z51 C6 that almost match the 2010 SS and are different from the more normal ratios seen on the Z06/Standard C6. Those ratios have been the standard 6 speed ratios for the 4th gen's, 03-04 Cobra and C5's.

http://www.chevrolet.com/corvette/specifications/
Old 08-22-2008 | 09:44 PM
  #51  
S. Holley's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 694
From: longwood, Fl, USA
Without a doubt the 5th Gen will run high 12s M6 and A6

I will bet the A6 will out perform the M6 at the 1/4 drags. Gearing is a factor here people. Also ... look at the 425hp dodge that goes 13.1-13.2 at 4100 lbs. your SS will be 300-400 lbs lighter.

GM is conservative with it HP numbers the cars will have the same motors as the VETTES. Look back to the 4th gen Z28 vs. C5 vettes ... the auto 4th gens were running the best times with the 3.23 rears... even though the vette was lighter than the 4th gen camaro.

Also... look at the C6 vettes with A4 vs. the newer A6 6.0 vettes... the A6 vettes are .2-.3ths faster.

I have raced a few A6 6.2 vettes... although they had air intakes and tune. they run BOTTOM BOTTOM 12s to high high 11s with 115-117mph.

FACE it most guys cant drive a M6 as good as the writers from MT, C/D, R&T etc... we certainly can NOT out drive the pros. Only a few will be able to shift the M6 to the mid 12.5-12.4 range in a new 422HP SS 5th Gen. Most will only manage 12.9-12.8....

I bet the A6 SS will be the car to have for DRAG racing...

BTW... all you anti IRS drag race fans...

My cam only LS1 C3 with 3.23 and TH350 cut 1.7 60ft times with a FOOT BRAKE !! 12.2 @112
Old 08-22-2008 | 11:02 PM
  #52  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
Originally Posted by S. Holley
Without a doubt the 5th Gen will run high 12s M6 and A6

I will bet the A6 will out perform the M6 at the 1/4 drags. Gearing is a factor here people. Also ... look at the 425hp dodge that goes 13.1-13.2 at 4100 lbs. your SS will be 300-400 lbs lighter.

GM is conservative with it HP numbers the cars will have the same motors as the VETTES. Look back to the 4th gen Z28 vs. C5 vettes ... the auto 4th gens were running the best times with the 3.23 rears... even though the vette was lighter than the 4th gen camaro.

Also... look at the C6 vettes with A4 vs. the newer A6 6.0 vettes... the A6 vettes are .2-.3ths faster.

I have raced a few A6 6.2 vettes... although they had air intakes and tune. they run BOTTOM BOTTOM 12s to high high 11s with 115-117mph.

FACE it most guys cant drive a M6 as good as the writers from MT, C/D, R&T etc... we certainly can NOT out drive the pros. Only a few will be able to shift the M6 to the mid 12.5-12.4 range in a new 422HP SS 5th Gen. Most will only manage 12.9-12.8....

I bet the A6 SS will be the car to have for DRAG racing...

BTW... all you anti IRS drag race fans...

My cam only LS1 C3 with 3.23 and TH350 cut 1.7 60ft times with a FOOT BRAKE !! 12.2 @112
the hemi cars are ~200-240 lbs more than their equiv. counterpart.

and the 422hp LS3 will be SAE certified, so there won't be any "conservative" GM rating. that's all it will make in stock form.
Old 08-23-2008 | 07:55 AM
  #53  
S. Holley's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 694
From: longwood, Fl, USA
Originally Posted by TrickStang37
the hemi cars are ~200-240 lbs more than their equiv. counterpart.

and the 422hp LS3 will be SAE certified, so there won't be any "conservative" GM rating. that's all it will make in stock form.
2009 Dodge Charger SRT8 Technical Specs
Curb Weight AT
4160
Ground Clearance
5.1
Height
58.2
Length
200.1
Top Type (Standard)
Hard Fixed
Top Type (Optional)
Not Applicable
Track (Front)
63.0
Track (Rear)
63.1
Weight Distribution AT (Front)
54
Weight Distribution AT (Rear)
46
Weight Distribution MT (Front)
N/A
Weight Distribution MT (Rear)
N/A
Wheelbase
120.0
Width
74.5
Doors (Standard)
4
Doors (Maximum)
4


OK so your saying NOW the 5th Gen Camaro weighs 3920?? Funny seems a little high for me. From what the general said.

SAE corrections asisde... do you think they will be a Difference in the MOTOR from a 6.2 in a C6 corvette, or 6.2 GTX G8, or Camaro SS? not talking exhaust systems.... strickly the motor??
Old 08-23-2008 | 03:45 PM
  #54  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
Originally Posted by S. Holley
2009 Dodge Charger SRT8 Technical Specs
Curb Weight AT
4160
Ground Clearance
5.1
Height
58.2
Length
200.1
Top Type (Standard)
Hard Fixed
Top Type (Optional)
Not Applicable
Track (Front)
63.0
Track (Rear)
63.1
Weight Distribution AT (Front)
54
Weight Distribution AT (Rear)
46
Weight Distribution MT (Front)
N/A
Weight Distribution MT (Rear)
N/A
Wheelbase
120.0
Width
74.5
Doors (Standard)
4
Doors (Maximum)
4


OK so your saying NOW the 5th Gen Camaro weighs 3920?? Funny seems a little high for me. From what the general said.

SAE corrections asisde... do you think they will be a Difference in the MOTOR from a 6.2 in a C6 corvette, or 6.2 GTX G8, or Camaro SS? not talking exhaust systems.... strickly the motor??
nice CHARGER. based on information around, the CHALLENGER is said to weigh 4040-4140.

As for the LS3 available to the GXP and SS, i think will be the same as the corvette. But to get the power to the C6 (430-436 hp), it will mean it is modified.
Old 08-24-2008 | 01:43 PM
  #55  
S. Holley's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 694
From: longwood, Fl, USA
Originally Posted by TrickStang37
nice CHARGER. based on information around, the CHALLENGER is said to weigh 4040-4140.

As for the LS3 available to the GXP and SS, i think will be the same as the corvette. But to get the power to the C6 (430-436 hp), it will mean it is modified.
these cars still have overall better gearing than the vette. even though the vette is lighter. the gearing will make up some distance for the light weight.

the cars will run 12s
Old 08-24-2008 | 03:17 PM
  #56  
Highlander's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,083
From: San Juan PR
Originally Posted by S. Holley
Without a doubt the 5th Gen will run high 12s M6 and A6

I will bet the A6 will out perform the M6 at the 1/4 drags. Gearing is a factor here people. Also ... look at the 425hp dodge that goes 13.1-13.2 at 4100 lbs. your SS will be 300-400 lbs lighter.

GM is conservative with it HP numbers the cars will have the same motors as the VETTES. Look back to the 4th gen Z28 vs. C5 vettes ... the auto 4th gens were running the best times with the 3.23 rears... even though the vette was lighter than the 4th gen camaro.

Also... look at the C6 vettes with A4 vs. the newer A6 6.0 vettes... the A6 vettes are .2-.3ths faster.

I have raced a few A6 6.2 vettes... although they had air intakes and tune. they run BOTTOM BOTTOM 12s to high high 11s with 115-117mph.

FACE it most guys cant drive a M6 as good as the writers from MT, C/D, R&T etc... we certainly can NOT out drive the pros. Only a few will be able to shift the M6 to the mid 12.5-12.4 range in a new 422HP SS 5th Gen. Most will only manage 12.9-12.8....

I bet the A6 SS will be the car to have for DRAG racing...

BTW... all you anti IRS drag race fans...

My cam only LS1 C3 with 3.23 and TH350 cut 1.7 60ft times with a FOOT BRAKE !! 12.2 @112
c6s where never ever a4s. And C5s where not that much lighter than ls1s 4th gens... 200 lbs at most? Its not like now that we have a 600-700lb punishment.

Last edited by Highlander; 08-24-2008 at 03:25 PM.
Old 08-24-2008 | 03:21 PM
  #57  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
Originally Posted by S. Holley
these cars still have overall better gearing than the vette. even though the vette is lighter. the gearing will make up some distance for the light weight.

the cars will run 12s
No they dont, not the manual camaro's. The base corvette has basically the same horrid overally gearing while the Z51 is a little better than the manual camaro's.

The auto camaro's do have better gearing than the auto corvettes, but will suffer from both the weight issue AND a considerable less amount of power. The auto camaro will make up some distance on the manual camaro's though with that gearing, I completely agree with you on that.

Last edited by TrickStang37; 08-24-2008 at 03:30 PM.
Old 08-24-2008 | 03:35 PM
  #58  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
Originally Posted by The Highlander
c6s where never ever a4s. And C5s where not that much lighter than ls1s 4th gens... 200 lbs at most? Its not like now that we have a 600-700lb punishment.
well, they were A4's (LS2's), just never with the LS3.
Old 08-24-2008 | 03:47 PM
  #59  
Highlander's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,083
From: San Juan PR
No... they were A5s on 2005 (ls2) a6s with the ls2 on 2006 up.
Old 08-24-2008 | 04:38 PM
  #60  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
Originally Posted by The Highlander
No... they were A5s on 2005 (ls2) a6s with the ls2 on 2006 up.
in '05 they used the 4 speed 4L65-E, which is a revised version of the 4L60 for more tq and higher shift points.


Quick Reply: 1/4 mile calculations



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48 PM.