2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion All 5th Generation Camaro technical discussion that doesn't fit in other forums

Who's in for a V6 performance package?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2007 | 02:32 AM
  #46  
93Phoenix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 393
From: Roch, NY
The V6 performance package should be strictly handling modifcations and maybe an emblem or two IMO. If you add performance mods you only push it towards the price of the V8 which will way outpower it no matter what.
Old 05-15-2007 | 02:41 AM
  #47  
93Phoenix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 393
From: Roch, NY
Originally Posted by EnerjetF67
but the Turbo Buick 3.8 SFI engine (which NEVER should have been discontinued and replaced by the TURD stuporcharged 3800)
GM was going FWD in the late 80s. The engineers at General Motors knew the transverse transmissions of that time would not stand up to the LC2's power. 10 years later, the L67 (Series II SC) was neutered from the factory because the potential was remembered, it's the only roots blown engine I can think of that didn't come with an intercooler from the factory (think Thunderbird Supercoupe, Lightning, Cobalt SS, 03-04 Cobra). That motor with a factory intercooler would push a w-body into the high 13s. Surely GM couldn't have these grocery getters romp on the LT1 f-bodies around at the time, just like the f-bodies are rated lower then the Corvettes are. Make sense?

Last edited by 93Phoenix; 05-15-2007 at 02:57 AM.
Old 05-19-2007 | 07:34 PM
  #48  
viper03af's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 455
From: Belleville, IL
i think there should be a V6, a v6 that looks nice and a turbo v6 with 425HP just to be different. this is so I only need a boost controller and tunning , and a Stall
Old 07-23-2008 | 02:36 PM
  #49  
DAKMOR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,406
From: Philaduhphia
Anybody still interested in the PV-6??
Old 07-24-2008 | 10:19 PM
  #50  
383DroptopZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 16
Great minds think alike.

I was just thinking about this today.

I would definitely be in for a V6 performance package with just upgraded shocks/springs/swaybars, and, most importantly, BRAKES!! (Chevy, ya gotta be kiddin' me with single-piston front brakes on a 300-HP, 3,750-lb. car... Did you forget about the LT1 cars' brakes?? Sheesh!) True duals would be nice, too (we know the body will accomodate them).

If such a package were built, I would LOVE to see a comparison chart between a Performance Package V6 Camaro, with the above changes, vs. a $42,000 BASE model BMW 335i coupe.

Think about it... With no drivetrain modifications to the Camaro, you'd have 300 HP for both, similar weight, both RWD, both IRS, and the Camaro would cost ~$15,000 less, run on regular instead of premium gas, and get better gas mileage to boot!) I'd be in for sure.
Old 07-27-2008 | 04:15 AM
  #51  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
a BMW is a status car, the camaro is just merely another chevy.
Old 07-29-2008 | 11:20 PM
  #52  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
Originally Posted by 93Phoenix
GM was going FWD in the late 80s. The engineers at General Motors knew the transverse transmissions of that time would not stand up to the LC2's power. 10 years later, the L67 (Series II SC) was neutered from the factory because the potential was remembered, it's the only roots blown engine I can think of that didn't come with an intercooler from the factory (think Thunderbird Supercoupe, Lightning, Cobalt SS, 03-04 Cobra). That motor with a factory intercooler would push a w-body into the high 13s. Surely GM couldn't have these grocery getters romp on the LT1 f-bodies around at the time, just like the f-bodies are rated lower then the Corvettes are. Make sense?
to me? no! I mean I believe you but the logic is retarded...
Old 07-30-2008 | 02:02 PM
  #53  
GMRL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 307
Originally Posted by 383DroptopZ
I was just thinking about this today.

I would definitely be in for a V6 performance package with just upgraded shocks/springs/swaybars, and, most importantly, BRAKES!! (Chevy, ya gotta be kiddin' me with single-piston front brakes on a 300-HP, 3,750-lb. car... Did you forget about the LT1 cars' brakes?? Sheesh!) True duals would be nice, too (we know the body will accomodate them).

If such a package were built, I would LOVE to see a comparison chart between a Performance Package V6 Camaro, with the above changes, vs. a $42,000 BASE model BMW 335i coupe.

Think about it... With no drivetrain modifications to the Camaro, you'd have 300 HP for both, similar weight, both RWD, both IRS, and the Camaro would cost ~$15,000 less, run on regular instead of premium gas, and get better gas mileage to boot!) I'd be in for sure.
Are they in fact single piston calipers? Pretty much everything now hows at least dual piston calipers. I figured they would use somthing like the 98-02 cars.
Old 09-03-2008 | 03:54 PM
  #54  
kanys's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 38
From: Houston
Yeah they have said "single-piston calipers on all wheels". This is not enough for a car with this much horsepower and weight if you don't want to be stopping in the middle of intersections!!! Lol ok maybe it wont be that bad, but GM MUST make a brake upgrade an option, or they will lose a ton of money for I know many people who want to upgrade their V6 brakes to like 3 piston Brembo's, some even 4. I understand those Brembo calipers are monsterous, so they could make it an option only for LT's w/ RS cause of the 20" wheels.
Old 09-05-2008 | 01:51 PM
  #55  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,372
From: Kilgore TX 75662
I am really thinking that it would be SO easy for GM to offer a special handling package for the V6 cars. The V6 cars get softer shocks, springs, and swaybars, plus the smaller wheels and brakes. How difficult would if be to include those upgraded features on the V6?

It would be the best handling Camaro of all time.

Or maybe just wait and see if there is anything like a Z/28 on the way, and then pull the suspension goodies off that car?

Of course at the same time I'm thinking that there would be a market for the smaller/lighter brakes and softer/lighter suspension from the V6 on a "drag pack" V8 car. Maybe, just maybe even include the M6's 3.45 gearset on the A6? That would likely be the quickest (factory) Camaro of all time.
Old 09-07-2008 | 08:57 PM
  #56  
kanys's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 38
From: Houston
Originally Posted by AdioSS
I am really thinking that it would be SO easy for GM to offer a special handling package for the V6 cars. The V6 cars get softer shocks, springs, and swaybars, plus the smaller wheels and brakes. How difficult would if be to include those upgraded features on the V6?

That would likely be the quickest (factory) Camaro of all time.
Yeah that all sounds great to me, I really don't want to hassle with aftermarket upgrades (cause knowing me I will probably buy way more than I need and end up wasting a ton of money ), but I do want my Camaro to be pretty fast and have really nice handling and stopping distance and such. So PLEASE GM make this performance package avaliable!
Old 04-06-2009 | 11:15 AM
  #57  
CarolinaLou's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
A supercharged V6 would be cool. Idunno. I might just wait a year and get a SS when I can afford it. Current plans is for a LT1 with RS Package but would like the SS2 but $37,000 is a bit much for me now.
Old 06-22-2009 | 10:44 PM
  #58  
krj-1168's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
A V6 Performance package sounds great.

At 304 hp the V6 has loads of potential to be a great sleeper.

I would love to see GMPP offer a Supercharger package (good for 60-90 hp) for the V6 Camaro. Possible even some additional performance parts - such as free-flowing cylinder heads, larger Throttle Bodies, Ram Air/Col Air Induction, and a better flowing Exhaust system.

It would be great to be able to build a 350 hp N/A V6 Camaro (with performance parts). Or a 390-400+ hp Forced Induction V6 Camaro. So that V6 Camaro Owners could surprise Mustang GT & Challenger R/T Owners.
Old 06-23-2009 | 04:26 PM
  #59  
mpilarZ281992's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 116
Let's see, for $500 or under, and at GM pricing, the only think that will afford is a shiny turbo chrome plate/sticker on the back. Or just stop by autozone and purchase for under $10. I say lets go crazy 80s retro on the 2010 and put designer rear window louvers on the back with the additional $350 option to color match the paint.
Old 06-23-2009 | 08:06 PM
  #60  
krj-1168's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
Well - Based on the options list - It looks as if Chevy has already planned for a Air Induction & Exhaust upgrades for the V6 Camaro.

But The 304HP V6 certainly should have some nice performance options - Such as the Following.

- Engine Performance packages - such as Ported & polished cylinder heads, larger throttle body, & Performance Cams
- A good Supercharger/intercooler combo.
- Upgraded Brakes - at least equal to the SS model
- Upgrade Springs & Shocks
- A good Nitrous System - with 50/75/100 hp shots.

Also another thought - using the 130hp/liter figure from the Turbo 2 liter Ecotec found in the Saturn Sky Redline/Pontiac Solstice GXP. The 3.6L DOHC VVT V-6 found in the 2010 Camaro would put out about 460 hp - which is more powerful than the LS3 V8 found in the SS.

Last edited by krj-1168; 06-23-2009 at 09:07 PM.


Quick Reply: Who's in for a V6 performance package?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 AM.