350+ stroker motor cams
08-05-2003, 01:38 PM
#19
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Markham, ON
Posts: 1,240
Originally posted by 82355
I would avoid Lunati camshafts, I always recommend Comp.
Martin
I would avoid Lunati camshafts, I always recommend Comp.
Martin
114* LSA, 230/236* duration @.050, .545/.555 lift w/ 1.5 rockers. I would want a 112* LSA,
I see that you also have a 1990 350 tpi, I was wondering what color your fuel injectors are if they are still stock? thanks
08-05-2003, 01:41 PM
#20
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Markham, ON
Posts: 1,240
btw thats the plan for my car but i dont see how in the hell im going to pull off that engine and passing an ontario emissions test. Maybe with my stock cam id have a hope in hell of passing? i dont think theres a visual so i guess i could just do a swap in swap out every two years???
08-05-2003, 02:16 PM
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Albion, Nebraska, USA
Posts: 274
I say that becuase they use outdated lobe technology. 1960's technology was cool in the 60's but there over now. I and almost everyone I know uses Comp, GM Performance Parts or Crane. I have one friend with a Lunati Cam in his LS1 (it was put together a few years ago when there wasn't many options) and he likes it but wishes he had a different brand. Just personal preference mainly, and the subject asked for opinions so I supplied mine.
Martin
Martin
08-05-2003, 02:19 PM
#22
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Markham, ON
Posts: 1,240
Originally posted by 82355
I say that becuase they use outdated lobe technology. 1960's technology was cool in the 60's but there over now. I and almost everyone I know uses Comp, GM Performance Parts or Crane. I have one friend with a Lunati Cam in his LS1 (it was put together a few years ago when there wasn't many options) and he likes it but wishes he had a different brand. Just personal preference mainly, and the subject asked for opinions so I supplied mine.
Martin
I say that becuase they use outdated lobe technology. 1960's technology was cool in the 60's but there over now. I and almost everyone I know uses Comp, GM Performance Parts or Crane. I have one friend with a Lunati Cam in his LS1 (it was put together a few years ago when there wasn't many options) and he likes it but wishes he had a different brand. Just personal preference mainly, and the subject asked for opinions so I supplied mine.
Martin
08-05-2003, 02:50 PM
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 584
Originally posted by 82355
I say that becuase they use outdated lobe technology. 1960's technology was cool in the 60's but there over now. I and almost everyone I know uses Comp, GM Performance Parts or Crane. I have one friend with a Lunati Cam in his LS1 (it was put together a few years ago when there wasn't many options) and he likes it but wishes he had a different brand. Just personal preference mainly, and the subject asked for opinions so I supplied mine.
Martin
I say that becuase they use outdated lobe technology. 1960's technology was cool in the 60's but there over now. I and almost everyone I know uses Comp, GM Performance Parts or Crane. I have one friend with a Lunati Cam in his LS1 (it was put together a few years ago when there wasn't many options) and he likes it but wishes he had a different brand. Just personal preference mainly, and the subject asked for opinions so I supplied mine.
Martin
08-05-2003, 02:52 PM
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 584
600 horsepower is not a realistic goal on a radical 383, let alone a street engine that gets decent gas mileage. You need a power adder to achieve what you want. Hell my friend with a gen 1 383 with brodix track 1's, 11.5:1 compression and a solid cam isnt close to 600 horsepower.
08-05-2003, 05:39 PM
#26
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Markham, ON
Posts: 1,240
Originally posted by doug791
Yeah i think 112 is pretty much going to be optimal because im not cool with this thing killing me with gas. I still have a feeling that with the 383 im going to need something duration wise 24*/25* or would that be getting a little too close to becoming unstreetable? My goals for this car are 600 hp n/a at the crank, with a 383, afr 195's, a mini-ram and a cam somewhere along the specs of what ive sugested.
Yeah i think 112 is pretty much going to be optimal because im not cool with this thing killing me with gas. I still have a feeling that with the 383 im going to need something duration wise 24*/25* or would that be getting a little too close to becoming unstreetable? My goals for this car are 600 hp n/a at the crank, with a 383, afr 195's, a mini-ram and a cam somewhere along the specs of what ive sugested.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM
squirrels
Site Help and Suggestions
4
07-13-2002 01:58 AM