3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

Compression Ratio question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2003, 03:34 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Teknohund's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lisbon, Ia
Posts: 79
Compression Ratio question

Quick question. I have a 355 in my car, with stock bore and stroke, and I was looking at different heads, and what compression would I get if I went with 74cc heads or 68cc heads, or even 64cc heads. I was looking at AFR 190 or 195's to be exact.
Thanks
Chris
Teknohund is offline  
Old 01-01-2003, 03:46 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
mod313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hanover, MA
Posts: 177
You need to give more info. Like chamber cc's you have now, what pistons are in it, etc.
mod313 is offline  
Old 01-01-2003, 04:09 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Teknohund's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lisbon, Ia
Posts: 79
Here are all the engine specs that I know:
4-bolt main block bored .030 over, decked .010
.010R and .010M cast crank
ARP rod bolts, rods resized
TRW forged flat-top pistons
MOLY rings
Michigan bearings
LT-1 heads (old-net reverse cooled)
Manely Valves 2.02-1.6
Hardened exhaust seats
Z-28 valve springs
New pushrods
Elgin rollar tip rockers
Speed pro Hyd. Cam-
302 degrees, 536 lift int, 536 lift Ex
Performer RPM intake

hope that helps
Chris
Teknohund is offline  
Old 01-01-2003, 04:55 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Z_Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Arlington Texas
Posts: 44
Here is a good place to calculate what it will be.
http://www.smokemup.com/auto_math/compression_ratio.php

Their is a lot of stuff that you need to know to get it really close to what it will be.

Here is what all you need to know.

Bore
(Inches)
Stroke
(Inches)
Connecting Rod Length
(Inches)
Cylinder Head Volume
(cc)
Deck Height
(Inches)
Head Gasket Bore
(Inches)
Head Gasket Thickness
(Inches)
Piston to Cylinder Wall Clearance
(Inches)
Top Ring Land Height
(Inches)
Piston Dish Volume
(cc)
Z_Ghost is offline  
Old 01-01-2003, 05:02 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Teknohund's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lisbon, Ia
Posts: 79
which chamber size would you guys recommend? the 78,74,68,or 64cc ones?
Chris
Teknohund is offline  
Old 01-01-2003, 05:33 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Stephen 87 IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500' elevation
Posts: 2,037
Although a smaller chamber will bump up compression it also shrouds the valves. As long as the heads can flow enough to feed the engine, use whatever chamber size gives you the best compression ratio that you want to use. Using 58cc 305 heads may sound like a good way to increase compression but if you're trying to feed a 383 or 406, the heads won't flow enough to provide the engine with it's best performance.

If you're building from scratch, use an open chamber design 76cc head and install dome pistons to increase the compression.

Determining what compression ratio is best depends on a lot of factors. Type of fuel used and if a power adder will be used or not. High compression builds torque.
Stephen 87 IROC is offline  
Old 01-01-2003, 10:47 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Teknohund's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lisbon, Ia
Posts: 79
thanks for all the help. I think i understand it now.
Chris
Teknohund is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
1
05-25-2016 08:10 PM
RUENUF
South Atlantic
4
03-13-2016 03:39 PM
Magenta_Hearts
New Member Introduction
4
03-25-2015 10:24 AM
pimpss96
LT1 Based Engine Tech
4
02-12-2015 01:28 PM



Quick Reply: Compression Ratio question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 PM.