3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

Top Speed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2004, 07:34 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
trackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 519
Originally posted by 1BADDAM
0 to 60 - TTA

1/4 - LS1

Top speed - Not fair to compare a car with a limiter vs. one essentially without one. Likewise, to compare two performance cars with tire technology 13 yrs apart ( I'd like to see an LS1 car run low 13's with Goodyear Gatorbacks ) The debate will never end.
I was assuming the LS1 would have the limiter removed (and still lose).
trackbird is offline  
Old 03-09-2004, 11:28 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
FruityOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 167
I'll have to track down the article, but the 1987 Camaro IROC-Z with the 5.7L TPI, 700r4 ran to 149mph. I've heard stories of them going faster. With the Trans Am being more aerodynamic I'm sure it could squeeze another mph or two out.

Here is the article I am referring too. Road & Track, October 1986
The perennial Ford-Chevy battle continues with a 225-bhp GT vs a 220-bhp IROC-Z

*If you are going to pound me for saying there were no 5.7L TPI Irocs in 1986 then you are correct. It was a magazine test testing the new models for the year. Notice that both cars are rated at about 220hp. In the later years GM gave them more power. To the tune of 245hp and 345lb/ft for the 90+ SD cars.

A stock 91 Trans Am GTA owned by someone I know dynoed 225hp and 315lb/ft to the wheels. He didn't even have a K&N filter on the darn thing! 150mph is ENTIRELY possible.

My own experience tells me that 145mph in my GTA is quite possible. Fastest I've ever run was about 135mph (on my speedo) before I chickened out and let off the gas. Had plenty of throttle left because I couldn't go into 4th gear at WOT. That maybe one reason that some people don't think they can hit 150mph. Because just about all 350TPI/Auto's (except B4C's) were not capable of going full throttle in 4th gear. They had to maintain about 2/3rd throttle or it would downshift into 3rd.
FruityOne is offline  
Old 03-09-2004, 11:49 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
CODY BEHNKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 711
How fast do you all think a stock TTA is? My goodness yes they are qwick but they aren't faster than any LS1. A decent driver can pull 0-60 in less than 5 seconds. My friend has a pretty nice TTA that is all stock except a little air box modification and I roast him.

By the way the Gatorbacks aren't any worse than the OEM eagle F1's and GSC's on LS1's.
CODY BEHNKE is offline  
Old 03-10-2004, 12:06 AM
  #49  
Registered User
 
FruityOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 167
*Shrugs*

Its all a guess until we get solid numbers from a stock TTA.

Motor Trend quotes 4.6 seconds to 60mph in a TTA (I have a video for proof), and through the 1/4 in the low 13's. They don't state the exact time, or trap speed though. However, 4.6 seconds to 60mph is definitely mentioned. Motor Trend TTA Review

As far as top speed, I think a TTA would edge out the LS1 on the very top end. The thirdgen Firebird body is capable of hitting 200mph while remaining stable without ANY body modification. And even on the 300mph bonneville cars all they did was lower the car, change the rims, and duct tape the windows shut to prevent them from blowing out. Though they did add a little weight for some "free downforce"

Last edited by FruityOne; 03-10-2004 at 12:11 AM.
FruityOne is offline  
Old 03-10-2004, 01:42 AM
  #50  
Registered User
 
1BADDAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 26
Originally posted by CODY BEHNKE
How fast do you all think a stock TTA is?


Don't have to think about that one.

In the 1/4, Mags had them from 13.4 to 14.2

Other owners have claimed stock times as low as 12.9's

Mine was never baselined, but for less money than the cost of a lid for an LS1, I went 12.7 @ 113 on reg. street radials.
1BADDAM is offline  
Old 03-10-2004, 07:42 AM
  #51  
Registered User
 
RobsWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 467
Originally posted by CODY BEHNKE
How fast do you all think a stock TTA is? My goodness yes they are qwick but they aren't faster than any LS1. A decent driver can pull 0-60 in less than 5 seconds. My friend has a pretty nice TTA that is all stock except a little air box modification and I roast him.

By the way the Gatorbacks aren't any worse than the OEM eagle F1's and GSC's on LS1's.
Mine went 13.0@104 with just a K&N, thermostat, and chip. That was my first and only trip to the track with that setup. Ran 5 times and they were all 13.0x.

As far as tires, Gatorbacks are terrible compared to the GSC's and F1's. I could cut high 1.8x on my GSC's in my 96 WS6. And that was an M6 and 4.10 gears. There is no way you could do that with stock Gatorbacks, even if they were brand new.

As far as top speed. The TA is much more stable at speed than a 4th gen. My WS6 was a hardtop and the windows were still trying to pull away from the roof. The TA was nice and quiet at speed, no wind buffeting.

The cars make similar power numbers but at different rpm. The 4th gens can't pull up to the rpm whereas the TTA can pull the rpm needed to run the faster top end. Its right in its power band where the LS1 can't get there with the gearing it has.
RobsWS6 is offline  
Old 03-11-2004, 02:49 PM
  #52  
Registered User
 
CODY BEHNKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 711
So a LS1 lacks top end and gearing?

No
CODY BEHNKE is offline  
Old 03-11-2004, 04:22 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
RobsWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 467
Originally posted by CODY BEHNKE
So a LS1 lacks top end and gearing?

No
Not top end, gearing. Try and run it out in 6th and you'll slow down. It will not pull to the top of 5th either. Not enough gearing to pull the rpm up to peak power.

Don't be so close minded about the almighty LS1 and the LC2. Completely different animals with different power curves.
RobsWS6 is offline  
Old 03-11-2004, 05:42 PM
  #54  
Registered User
 
trackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 519
Originally posted by RobsWS6
Don't be so close minded about the almighty LS1 and the LC2. Completely different animals with different power curves.
The power curve and aerodynamic issues are why I'd put my money on the TTA. I like my LS1, don't get me wrong, but "different animals" about sums it up.
trackbird is offline  
Old 03-11-2004, 06:37 PM
  #55  
Registered User
 
CODY BEHNKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 711
I ain't just saying LS1's are better. This is just a HP issue.

I think that it is pretty obvious that a car (LT1 or LS1) won't accelerate in 6th Duh!

I understand the power curve thing too. Like I said my buddy has one!

Look at what 4th gens are pulling of without a limiter. Just like how a LS1 C5 tops out higher than a ZO6 because of gearing.
CODY BEHNKE is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
REDNECKISBOSS
LT1 Based Engine Tech
5
04-17-2015 07:14 AM
canbaufo
Cars For Sale
0
02-24-2015 10:27 AM
LastChance719
Cars Wanted
1
02-16-2015 11:03 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
01-11-2015 06:10 PM
mark0006
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
3
12-25-2014 09:50 PM



Quick Reply: Top Speed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.