View Poll Results: My preference for the 6th gen's top motor is:
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll
6th Gen Camaro top powertrain poll....
#46
While there may not be a huge efficiency savings between the 4.8 and 5.3 keep in mind there isn't a AFM version in the smaller displacement. I'd actually like to see them go even smaller; perhaps has small as 4.0L. It would be interesting to see how a DI/AFM 4.0L V8 would compare in both efficiency and power to say the current DI V6. I would think 350-400hp could be possible with a slightly better highway fuel mileage in 4-cylinder mode.
#47
While there may not be a huge efficiency savings between the 4.8 and 5.3 keep in mind there isn't a AFM version in the smaller displacement. I'd actually like to see them go even smaller; perhaps has small as 4.0L. It would be interesting to see how a DI/AFM 4.0L V8 would compare in both efficiency and power to say the current DI V6. I would think 350-400hp could be possible with a slightly better highway fuel mileage in 4-cylinder mode.
The smallest I can see doing a V8 is 5.0L. Even Fords 4.6L doesn't look too good up against modern V6's. It is only 9hp ahead of the Camaro V6. 4.6L vs. Ecoboost V6, forget about it.
Last edited by Z28x; 11-06-2009 at 12:45 PM.
#48
I think the High Feature V6 can go as large as 4.0L. I see no reason to build a V8 with the displacement of a large V6. That would be like making a 2.4L V6, whats the point. Your spending all that money on extra parts, why not make them a little larger to get some decent power.
The smallest I can see doing a V8 is 5.0L. Even Fords 4.6L doesn't look too good up against modern V6's. It is only 9hp ahead of the Camaro V6. 4.6L vs. Ecoboost V6, forget about it.
The smallest I can see doing a V8 is 5.0L. Even Fords 4.6L doesn't look too good up against modern V6's. It is only 9hp ahead of the Camaro V6. 4.6L vs. Ecoboost V6, forget about it.
#49
#51
Oddly enough I was asking someone at Bosch about that last night and got an interesting response. Tuning for emissions vs power vs mpg are all different - but now it has come to tuning for one govt regulation or another. As such, I don't think you'll see much of a difference on the window stickers, but as far as CAFE is concerned the GenV will be a good improvement.
In trucks - 7-10% once the dust has settled and a year or two of refinement has gone by. Cars a little better, maybe as much as 13% in cars with lower drag like the Vette (especially combined with smaller displacement engines and some weight reduction). I could see slightly higher though as time goes on.
But again, the gearing and tunes will probably be more optimized for CAFE testing, as that is now the bigger worry. Anyone who's going to buy a Corvette won't care about 2mpg more vs 3mpg more. But CAFE will care a LOT.
If I were a betting man, I'd bet if you took a C7 and held 65mph in Montana for 800 miles, you'd average in the upper 30s for mpg.
In trucks - 7-10% once the dust has settled and a year or two of refinement has gone by. Cars a little better, maybe as much as 13% in cars with lower drag like the Vette (especially combined with smaller displacement engines and some weight reduction). I could see slightly higher though as time goes on.
But again, the gearing and tunes will probably be more optimized for CAFE testing, as that is now the bigger worry. Anyone who's going to buy a Corvette won't care about 2mpg more vs 3mpg more. But CAFE will care a LOT.
If I were a betting man, I'd bet if you took a C7 and held 65mph in Montana for 800 miles, you'd average in the upper 30s for mpg.
#52
While there may not be a huge efficiency savings between the 4.8 and 5.3 keep in mind there isn't a AFM version in the smaller displacement. I'd actually like to see them go even smaller; perhaps has small as 4.0L. It would be interesting to see how a DI/AFM 4.0L V8 would compare in both efficiency and power to say the current DI V6. I would think 350-400hp could be possible with a slightly better highway fuel mileage in 4-cylinder mode.
I know from your previous posts that you like the small V8s. But I believe there's a very good reason you don't see very many of them.
#53
Oddly enough I was asking someone at Bosch about that last night and got an interesting response. Tuning for emissions vs power vs mpg are all different - but now it has come to tuning for one govt regulation or another. As such, I don't think you'll see much of a difference on the window stickers, but as far as CAFE is concerned the GenV will be a good improvement.
In trucks - 7-10% once the dust has settled and a year or two of refinement has gone by. Cars a little better, maybe as much as 13% in cars with lower drag like the Vette (especially combined with smaller displacement engines and some weight reduction). I could see slightly higher though as time goes on.
But again, the gearing and tunes will probably be more optimized for CAFE testing, as that is now the bigger worry. Anyone who's going to buy a Corvette won't care about 2mpg more vs 3mpg more. But CAFE will care a LOT.
If I were a betting man, I'd bet if you took a C7 and held 65mph in Montana for 800 miles, you'd average in the upper 30s for mpg.
In trucks - 7-10% once the dust has settled and a year or two of refinement has gone by. Cars a little better, maybe as much as 13% in cars with lower drag like the Vette (especially combined with smaller displacement engines and some weight reduction). I could see slightly higher though as time goes on.
But again, the gearing and tunes will probably be more optimized for CAFE testing, as that is now the bigger worry. Anyone who's going to buy a Corvette won't care about 2mpg more vs 3mpg more. But CAFE will care a LOT.
If I were a betting man, I'd bet if you took a C7 and held 65mph in Montana for 800 miles, you'd average in the upper 30s for mpg.
As for this, I guess the question is what would you rather have, given that they would put out the same power, the twin turbo 6 or the V8?
This brings up yet another question involving the M3. Lots of 3 series guys have found that they could a lot more power out of the 335i over the M3.
Id like to see the V8 remain under one of the Camaros, but I do wish for the TTV6 to make its way to the Camaro as well.
Last edited by Big Als Z; 11-07-2009 at 11:26 AM.
#54
My idea for a small V8 is simply to appease the "Camaro must have a V8" crowd. A smaller, lighter 6th gen probably doesn't need 450+hp. So if GM can get 5th gen V8 performance out of a turbo V6, I'm all for it. (But I seriously would love to have a turbo diesel option.)
#55
Europe does things differently for insurance purposes, vehicle taxes and emissions nonsense, which helps explain why BMW was so set on staying with the I6 for so long - and now with the 335i I wonder which engine is cheaper for BMW to build. I wonder which will eventually win in the long run for BMW...
For Camaro, I know a DI DOHC V6 is more expensive than a DI Pushrod V8. Add intercoolers and piping, the turbos themselves, higher heat rated components and more durability testing and the TT V6 is a very expensive proposal where you can kiss your profit margin goodbye. Then you'll likely have higher warranty costs as well.
That eats the bottom line straight out from under you - and is one major reason the V8 won out for the Mustang.
Originally Posted by teal98
The G8 runs in AFM mode infrequently
#60